A questionable position

[peter]

Oh you've found a big hole.
It will take me some time to correct it.

Well, you just could step back to previous version, couldn't you?
I liked it quite much regards

[Hobacle]

Oh you've found a big hole.
It will take me some time to correct it.

Well, you just could step back to previous version, couldn't you?
I liked it quite much regards

Which version?

[peter]

Oh you've found a big hole.
It will take me some time to correct it.

Well, you just could step back to previous version, couldn't you?
I liked it quite much regards

Which version?

This one?
http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 44#p892444

[Hobacle]

Oh you've found a big hole.
It will take me some time to correct it.

Well, you just could step back to previous version, couldn't you?
I liked it quite much regards

Which version?

This one?
http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 44#p892444

But... Why do you like it?

[peter]

Oh you've found a big hole.
It will take me some time to correct it.

Well, you just could step back to previous version, couldn't you?
I liked it quite much regards

Which version?

This one?
http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 44#p892444

But... Why do you like it?

It's still complicated enough (for me and my engines), of single best move- solution, and the main point of the long difficult and beautiful endgame is the same, so...
Yet I see you're not as easily to be enthused as I'am, how did you call it once, choss?

[Hobacle]

Oh you've found a big hole.
It will take me some time to correct it.

Well, you just could step back to previous version, couldn't you?
I liked it quite much regards

Which version?

This one?
http://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.p ... 44#p892444

But... Why do you like it?

It's still complicated enough (for me and my engines), of single best move- solution, and the main point of the long difficult and beautiful endgame is the same, so...
Yet I see you're not as easily to be enthused as I'am, how did you call it once, choss?

OK.
I still have a question, why SF MOJO give a score more than 0.00 after 1. Bc2 Rd2 2. Kxa7 in my last position, but not after 1. Kxa7 ?

[peter]

I still have a question, why SF MOJO give a score more than 0.00 after 1. Bc2 Rd2 2. Kxa7 in my last position, but not after 1. Kxa7 ?

That's a real good question, to be honest, I don't have any idea neither, why this is so.
As a matter of fact the output came after Backward of the 1.Bc2- lines, so there will have been more hash- entries to this one first move, yet I didn't manage to get a positive score for the main solution by Backward of its own so far, so...
An other aspect could be, that threefold doesn't come into pondering so soon and "successfully" for the engine with 1.Bc2, yet it would remain the same question, why this was so as for 1.Ka7.

Notice, nullmove as an UCI- option of MOJO's with positions like this I always turn off, yet that doesn't really help to anwer your question, no way to keep a positive score back to starting position with default setting neither.