2010 World Computer Rapid Chess Championships

[Paloma]

Hi Charles,

Latest version with complete games:

http://www.mediafire.com/?zaggbugeu99hota

Only correction I made was in a game black gave checkmate
and white wins. I deleted last move and added a variant.
Because most PGN readers will complain there. Another correction
was the tournament name. New one is ACCA WCRCC 2010.

Best,

Hi Harun,
i don't understand why you set TheBaron wins. In official Cross Table ChessThinkerX wins vs TheBaron and has a score of 6,5

ps: thanks for the pdf file

regards

[beachknight]

Hi Charles,

Latest version with complete games:

http://www.mediafire.com/?zaggbugeu99hota

Only correction I made was in a game black gave checkmate
and white wins. I deleted last move and added a variant.
Because most PGN readers will complain there. Another correction
was the tournament name. New one is ACCA WCRCC 2010.

Best,

Hi Harun,
i don't understand why you set TheBaron wins. In official Cross Table ChessThinkerX wins vs TheBaron and has a score of 6,5

ps: thanks for the pdf file

regards

Erratum:

After black gave checkmate in the game mentioned,
the game result should be corrected as 0-1.



Best,

[beachknight]

Code: Select all

    Engine                Score  RyHaThCrSjArDiThToDeGaPlScJa    S-B
01: Rybka 4.0i 4cpu       12.5/13 · = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   73,25
02: Hannibal 1.0a         10.5/13 = · 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   55,75
03: Thinker 5.4Di 4cpu    10.5/13 0 1 · = 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   55,50
04: Crafty 23.3 4cpu PS   10.0/13 0 0 = · 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 1 1 1   49,50
05: Sjeng WC2008 4cpu     8.0/13  0 1 0 0 · 0 1 1 = = 1 1 1 1   38,00
06: Arasan 11.7 4cpu      7.5/13  0 0 1 0 1 · = 0 0 1 1 1 1 1   35,75
07: Dirty 0.99z22 w 0606  7.5/13  0 0 0 0 0 = · 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   28,25
08: The Baron 2.2.3       6.5/13  0 0 0 = 0 1 0 · 1 = = 1 1 1   26,00
09: Tornado 3.67 1cpu     4.5/13  0 0 0 0 = 1 0 0 · = = 0 1 1   17,50
10: Deuterium 090126492 w 4.5/13  0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = = · = = 1 1   14,75
11: Gaviota 0.75.7 4cpu   4.5/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = = = · 1 1 1   12,25
12: Plisk 0.2.5           3.0/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 = 0 · 1 =    8,00
13: Scorpio 2.6 JA 4cpu   1.0/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 1    0,50
14: Jabba 1.0 DC          0.5/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 ·    1,50

91 games played / Tournament finished
Name of the tournament: CET2806a
Site/ Country: CET_Antalya_TUR, Türkiye
Level: Blitz 2/2

[Engin]

merhaba Harun

Tornado 3.6.7 4cpu niye oynatmadin ? veya en az 2 cpu la ?

selam,
Engin

[beachknight]

merhaba Harun

Tornado 3.6.7 4cpu niye oynatmadin ? veya en az 2 cpu la ?

selam,
Engin

Hi Engin,

You asked me why I have not used Tornado 3.6.7 4cpu instead of 1cpu.
Fair question.

Because

I have first selected 4cpu. 4cpu version stopped just after book moves, ie 8 halfmoves. As I was away from the computer, I chose 1cpu version.

Best,

PS: I'd think Scorpio 2.6 1cpu version would have performed much better
than 4cpu version

[beachknight]

merhaba Harun

Tornado 3.6.7 4cpu niye oynatmadin ? veya en az 2 cpu la ?

selam,
Engin

Hi Engin,

You asked me why I have not used Tornado 3.6.7 4cpu instead of 1cpu.
Fair question.

Because

I have first selected 4cpu. 4cpu version stopped just after book moves, ie 8 halfmoves. As I was away from the computer, I chose 1cpu version.

Best,

PS: I'd think Scorpio 2.6 1cpu version would have performed much better
than 4cpu version

I have tried Tornado 4cpu version without success. Engine stops playing
just after book moves. Book off, TBs off, HT decrease etc. did not help
further.

On the other hand, Scorpio 1cpu performed much better as predicted:

Code: Select all

    Engine                Score  RyThHaCrSjDiArScThDeToGaPlJa    S-B
01: Rybka 4.0i 4cpu       12.5/13 · 1 = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   73,25
02: Thinker 5.4Di 4cpu    10.5/13 0 · 1 = 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   56,50
03: Hannibal 1.0a         10.5/13 = 0 · 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   55,75
04: Crafty 23.3 4cpu PS   9.0/13  0 = 0 · 1 1 1 0 = 1 1 1 1 1   44,00
05: Sjeng WC2008 4cpu     8.0/13  0 0 1 0 · 1 0 1 1 = = 1 1 1   40,25
06: Dirty 0.99z22 w 0606  7.5/13  0 0 0 0 0 · = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1   29,50
07: Arasan 11.7 4cpu      7.0/13  0 1 0 0 1 = · = 0 1 0 1 1 1   35,75
08: Scorpio 2.6 JA 1cpu   7.0/13  0 0 0 1 0 0 = · 1 = 1 1 1 1   29,50
09: The Baron 2.2.3       5.5/13  0 0 0 = 0 0 1 0 · = 1 = 1 1   21,25
10: Deuterium 090126492 w 4.0/13  0 0 0 0 = 0 0 = = · = = = 1   15,25
11: Tornado 3.67 1cpu     3.5/13  0 0 0 0 = 0 1 0 0 = · = 0 1   15,25
12: Gaviota 0.75.7 4cpu   3.5/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = = = · 1 1    9,00
13: Plisk 0.2.5           2.0/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = 1 0 · =    5,75
14: Jabba 1.0 DC          0.5/13  0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = ·    1,00

91 games played / Tournament finished
Name of the tournament: CET2810a
Site/ Country: CET_Antalya_TUR, Türkiye
Level: Blitz 2/2

Best,

[Audmeister]

Are the engines using their own books?

If so, is it possible to get the games? it seems that Rybka cannot get a perfect game

[Engin]

of course it can be there a bug by using 4 threads...i cant testing because i dont have a quad core mashine at home, but for sure you can use 2 cpus to playing, on my dual core its playing well and on ChessWar (by olivier deville) you can see there are playing a 2cpu version too.

And i had played on last ACCA online tournament as well with 2 cpu and took the 6th place

[beachknight]

Are the engines using their own books?

If so, is it possible to get the games? it seems that Rybka cannot get a perfect game

If present, yes. On the contrary, Rybka plays without book.

No, they are not available this time. I am making updates of games twice a year.

Best,

[beachknight]

of course it can be there a bug by using 4 threads...i cant testing because i dont have a quad core mashine at home, but for sure you can use 2 cpus to playing, on my dual core its playing well and on ChessWar (by olivier deville) you can see there are playing a 2cpu version too.

And i had played on last ACCA online tournament as well with 2 cpu and took the 6th place

Or a tablebase issue that I should check. I had some six men files which some engines dont like them. Next time I'll use first 2cpu version in the tests.

Best,