RubiChess NNUE player implemented

[RubiChess]

NNUE is wrong I thing?!

OK ...
But what should I do here?
If I added the name from the NNUE file I have to udpate the site to often.

Maybe better NN (for Neural Network)?

1.8 is the last official version of RubiChess, here I can not see a mistake!

1.8 is last release but it is not able to evaluate with NNUE. To use NNUE evaluation you have to use some newer unofficial version without binary and support from my side for now.

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Andreas,

I changed to NN for all.
Means *4 (NN = Neural Network) files possible.

Hope this is right!

I think important for my overview is only ... NN files possible or not!

If wrong again, please give me a hint.

Best
Frank

[RubiChess]

Hi Andreas,

I changed to NN for all.
Means *4 (NN = Neural Network) files possible.

Hope this is right!

I think important for my overview is only ... NN files possible or not!

If wrong again, please give me a hint.

Best
Frank

Still wrong. Call it NN files or NNUE, I don't care. Fact is: 1.8 has only traditional evaluation. NN/NNUE is only available in a newer development version as I wrote.

[Frank Quisinsky]

changed!

[Werner]

Can we expect an official release of Rubichess 1.9 with the new network nn-803c91ad5c-20201107.nnue ?

I will do a release when it is ready.
I don't know if the net you mention will be the strongest at that time. I am not even sure that it is stronger than the older net.
And I am not sure if I will release anything with NNUE enabled as a default. Still thinking about which way to go.

Regards, Andreas

Thanks Andreas for the answer. I will stop my tests with dev version.

[Frank Quisinsky]

Hi Werner,

I think it's not a mistake by us.

WIKI should be changed:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/NNUE

Have a look the entry / hint and notation to RubiChess ... "RubiChess 1.8 NNUE".

Best
Frank

PS: And what have Ed Schröder to do with it?
That's the perfect example why I dislike often to read WIKI.

[Frank Quisinsky]

should be changed in "German WIKI":
http://www.amateurschach.de/t2021/commo ... roeder.jpg

200 Elo?
A lot of mistakes!