Hiarcs 0.3 v Blincoes Chess Challenger

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, chrisw, Rebel

Alainza

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Alainza »

Hi Steve,

and what do you think of my new avatar :D ?

CC7 forever regards,
Alain
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Hi Alain,
Is this a deidcated computer chess LCD running out of batteries :?:

:P
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 42865
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Graham Banks »

Alainza wrote:Hi Steve,

and what do you think of my new avatar :D ?

CC7 forever regards,
Alain
Reminds me of my first chess computer except it wouldn't castle!
Alainza

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Alainza »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Hi Alain,
Is this a deidcated computer chess LCD running out of batteries :?:

:P
almost... but at that time, LCD had not yet been invented :wink:
Steve B

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Steve B »

Alainza wrote:Hi Steve,

and what do you think of my new avatar :D ?

CC7 forever regards,
Alain
Finest Avatar on the net!

Except for mine of course
8-) Regards
Steve
Alainza

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Alainza »

Graham Banks wrote:
Alainza wrote:Hi Steve,

and what do you think of my new avatar :D ?

CC7 forever regards,
Alain
Reminds me of my first chess computer except it wouldn't castle!
yes, I guess the CC10 had the same kind of display. I always wondered if the changed had a meaning. You could definitely recognize Check and Checkmate detected by the CC7 (88 88 for Check, and alternance of 88 88 and black display for Checkmate) but I don't know anything else.

Multi-PV Ancestor regards,
Alain
Alainza

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Alainza »

Steve B wrote:
Alainza wrote:Hi Steve,

and what do you think of my new avatar :D ?

CC7 forever regards,
Alain
Finest Avatar on the net!

Except for mine of course
8-) Regards
Steve
Yours is quite precious... but a bit static :wink:

Don't ask me to build an animated gif with Robot's emotions regards :?
Alain
Steve B

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Steve B »

Alainza wrote:
I have put the names because I had two "Fidelity Computers" tables and wanted different titles for each. May be the names are not a good idea ?
whatever you think is OK is Ok for me!
Alainza wrote:
Which computer is the next regards ?
Alain
well i have the RFT SC1 on my desk for testing
as it is a Fidelity Clone it also has the JUMPING EYES and i could make a video of that ..it also has different keys then the Fidelity's

but i can make a video of any computer you would like to add to the video section of your site so you only have to ask for which computer you think would be interesting to see

Hollywood Producer Regards
Steve
Uri Blass
Posts: 10610
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:37 am
Location: Tel-Aviv Israel

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Uri Blass »

Harvey Williamson wrote:After a late start due to extra openings prep and overclocking by Steve the match was played.

The CC3 won 1.5-0.5, over the Hiarcs 0.3 from 1981. We will arrange a rematch against the much stronger Hiarcs 0.5 from 1983.

[Event "Friendly Game, No clock"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2007.05.13"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Hiarcs0.3 (1981)"]
[Black "CC3"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "D00"]
[PlyCount "71"]
[EventDate "2007.05.13"]

1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. Bf4 Nh5 5. e3 Bg4 6. h3 Bf5 7. g4 Bg6 8. gxh5
Bxh5 9. Bb5 a6 10. Bxc6+ bxc6 11. O-O Qd7 12. Kg2 O-O-O 13. Qd3 a5 14. a3 Bg6
15. e4 dxe4 16. Nxe4 Qf5 17. Be5 Qxe4 18. Qc4 Bh5 19. Qb3 e6 20. Rfe1 Qg6+ 21.
Bg3 Qf5 22. Re5 Qg6 23. Rxa5 Be7 24. Rd1 Rhe8 25. Re1 Rg8 26. Qc4 Kb7 27. b4
Rge8 28. c3 Rh8 29. Qa2 Rhf8 30. Qc4 Rfe8 31. Qa2 Rh8 32. Qc4 Rhg8 33. Qa2 Rgf8
34. Qc4 Rh8 35. Qa2 Rhg8 36. Qc4 1/2-1/2

[Event "Friendly Game, No clock"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2007.05.13"]
[Round "?"]
[White "CC3"]
[Black "Hiarcs 0.3 (1981)"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B00"]
[PlyCount "61"]
[EventDate "2007.05.13"]

1. d4 Nc6 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. e4 d5 4. e5 Ne4 5. Na4 Bf5 6. f3 Nxe5 7. dxe5 e6 8.
fxe4 Bxe4 9. Be3 Bb4+ 10. c3 Be7 11. Qg4 O-O 12. O-O-O Qd7 13. Nc5 Bxc5 14.
Bxc5 Rfe8 15. Be2 f5 16. Qg3 b6 17. Ba3 c5 18. b3 d4 19. Bh5 Rf8 20. cxd4 Rac8
21. dxc5 Bd5 22. c6 Rxc6+ 23. Kb1 Rb8 24. Rd4 b5 25. Be2 Kf7 26. Rh4 Be4+ 27.
Ka1 Qd4+ 28. Bb2 Qd2 29. Rxh7 f4 30. Qxg7+ Ke8 31. Rh8# 1-0
Something seems to be wrong.
In the second game hiarcs could play 28...Rc1#

Are you sure there is no mistake in the pgn?

If not
Are you sure that Alain Zanchetta had no bugs in compiling Hiarcs0.3?

I also do not see the draw in game 1.
CC3 can force a draw by 3 time repetition but I did not see that it played the relevant move.

Uri
Harvey Williamson

Re: Hiarcs 0.3 v CC3 - Results

Post by Harvey Williamson »

Uri Blass wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:After a late start due to extra openings prep and overclocking by Steve the match was played.

The CC3 won 1.5-0.5, over the Hiarcs 0.3 from 1981. We will arrange a rematch against the much stronger Hiarcs 0.5 from 1983.

[Event "Friendly Game, No clock"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2007.05.13"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Hiarcs0.3 (1981)"]
[Black "CC3"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "D00"]
[PlyCount "71"]
[EventDate "2007.05.13"]

1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. Bf4 Nh5 5. e3 Bg4 6. h3 Bf5 7. g4 Bg6 8. gxh5
Bxh5 9. Bb5 a6 10. Bxc6+ bxc6 11. O-O Qd7 12. Kg2 O-O-O 13. Qd3 a5 14. a3 Bg6
15. e4 dxe4 16. Nxe4 Qf5 17. Be5 Qxe4 18. Qc4 Bh5 19. Qb3 e6 20. Rfe1 Qg6+ 21.
Bg3 Qf5 22. Re5 Qg6 23. Rxa5 Be7 24. Rd1 Rhe8 25. Re1 Rg8 26. Qc4 Kb7 27. b4
Rge8 28. c3 Rh8 29. Qa2 Rhf8 30. Qc4 Rfe8 31. Qa2 Rh8 32. Qc4 Rhg8 33. Qa2 Rgf8
34. Qc4 Rh8 35. Qa2 Rhg8 36. Qc4 1/2-1/2

[Event "Friendly Game, No clock"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2007.05.13"]
[Round "?"]
[White "CC3"]
[Black "Hiarcs 0.3 (1981)"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B00"]
[PlyCount "61"]
[EventDate "2007.05.13"]

1. d4 Nc6 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. e4 d5 4. e5 Ne4 5. Na4 Bf5 6. f3 Nxe5 7. dxe5 e6 8.
fxe4 Bxe4 9. Be3 Bb4+ 10. c3 Be7 11. Qg4 O-O 12. O-O-O Qd7 13. Nc5 Bxc5 14.
Bxc5 Rfe8 15. Be2 f5 16. Qg3 b6 17. Ba3 c5 18. b3 d4 19. Bh5 Rf8 20. cxd4 Rac8
21. dxc5 Bd5 22. c6 Rxc6+ 23. Kb1 Rb8 24. Rd4 b5 25. Be2 Kf7 26. Rh4 Be4+ 27.
Ka1 Qd4+ 28. Bb2 Qd2 29. Rxh7 f4 30. Qxg7+ Ke8 31. Rh8# 1-0
Something seems to be wrong.
In the second game hiarcs could play 28...Rc1#

Are you sure there is no mistake in the pgn?

If not
Are you sure that Alain Zanchetta had no bugs in compiling Hiarcs0.3?

Uri
Hi Uri,

Yes your right Hiarcs did not play Rc1 mate :( Dont forget this was a school project when Mark was 16. The version from the next school project when Mark was 18 is quite a bit more sophisticated and wont miss an easy win like that.

Best Wishes,

Harvey