To campaign or not

David Dahlem · Post by **David Dahlem** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:10 pm

kranium wrote:this is compelling information for discussion, not an accusation of any kind, or a presentation of evidence...

"not an accusation" ?? Come on, man, get real!!

kranium · Post by **kranium** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:11 pm

David Dahlem wrote:
kranium wrote:this is compelling information for discussion, not an accusation of any kind, or a presentation of evidence...
"not an accusation" ?? Come on, man, get real!!

where is it dave?

here is my post:
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23275

have you read it?

posting information/similarities is not akin to an accusation.

Guetti · Post by **Guetti** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:14 pm

Actually I like to camping. Especially in Toscana.

@Tony: In most tournaments, to be granted the request that the source code of a competitor is investigated you would have to show some evidence. I doubt similarities between Strelka and Fruit will be accepted. You would have to convince the TD that this is the case with some assembler from Rybka.

@ The only accusations I have seen recently is from Rybka fanboys against Zach, Christophe, Norm and Bob to do this because they are jealous. And I have even seen threats against these people.

chrisw · Post by **chrisw** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:17 pm

kranium wrote:
David Dahlem wrote:
kranium wrote:this is compelling information for discussion, not an accusation of any kind, or a presentation of evidence...
"not an accusation" ?? Come on, man, get real!!
where is it dave?

Spread over countless threads and hundreds of pages.

Do we have to hold your hand to find them? Go look.

Or how about .... it's not any one individual accusation, its the number and volume adding up to the larger picture?

I should bow out gracefully if I were you. Take a holiday.

kranium · Post by **kranium** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:23 pm

chrisw wrote:
kranium wrote:
David Dahlem wrote:
kranium wrote:this is compelling information for discussion, not an accusation of any kind, or a presentation of evidence...
"not an accusation" ?? Come on, man, get real!!
where is it dave?
Spread over countless threads and hundreds of pages.

Do we have to hold your hand to find them? Go look.

Or how about .... it's not any one individual accusation, its the number and volume adding up to the larger picture?

I should bow out gracefully if I were you. Take a holiday.

if you perceive that the sum total = an acusation, well so be it...you're entitled to your interpretation.

but you're not me, and i'm in...

chrisw · Post by **chrisw** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:28 pm

kranium wrote:
chrisw wrote:
kranium wrote:
David Dahlem wrote:
kranium wrote:this is compelling information for discussion, not an accusation of any kind, or a presentation of evidence...
"not an accusation" ?? Come on, man, get real!!
where is it dave?
Spread over countless threads and hundreds of pages.

Do we have to hold your hand to find them? Go look.

Or how about .... it's not any one individual accusation, its the number and volume adding up to the larger picture?

I should bow out gracefully if I were you. Take a holiday.
if you perceive that the sum total = an acusation, well so be it...you're entitled to your interpretation.

but you're not me, and i'm in...

I believe both the full picture and individual statements amount to serious legally revelent accusations. You missed the irony in the above comments also.

LarsA · Post by **LarsA** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:29 pm

kranium wrote:
David Dahlem wrote:
kranium wrote:this is compelling information for discussion, not an accusation of any kind, or a presentation of evidence...
"not an accusation" ?? Come on, man, get real!!
where is it dave?

here is my post:
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23275

have you read it?

posting information/similarities is not akin to an accusation.

Ok, I should ignore your post, but I can't:

My accusation:

You fail to see Ed's point!

Ed's point:

Only release the evidence when it is COMPLETE

Your answer to Ed's post:

This is where we are starting:
http://64.68.157.89/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23275
theres more to come...

the post contains this line:

please give Zach, and others, some time to produce the web site and further info

Conclusion:

See "My accusation"

kranium · Post by **kranium** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:35 pm

i get it now...

info = accusation

i didn't now that

chrisw · Post by **chrisw** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:41 pm

kranium wrote:i get it now...

info = accusation

i didn't now that

perhaps a judge will explain one day?

LarsA · Post by **LarsA** » Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:56 pm

kranium wrote:i get it now...

info = accusation

i didn't now that

(http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accuse)
Accuse: to charge with a fault or offense

Consider my post to be a case of "to charge with a fault"

Actually, if you back your accusations with enough solid evidence, your "math" might not be too far off...

To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not

Re: To campaign or not