CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw

Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6073
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by Christopher Conkie »

Harvey Williamson wrote:
BubbaTough wrote:
But let's just suppose you want to join the CCC team the game has not started yet. My understanding is that you can not(unless you join team hiarcs) as the CCC?! team is now locked away on the Conkie forum - well all 7 of them - this is not a CCC team.
My understanding is that this is not true. If someone wanted to play they could. It seems unlikely though, since the vitriol from this thread have scared most away.

-Sam
Excellent. Perhaps you would be better playing team Conkie v CCC we have a serious player waiting so personally I would be happy to cancel.
That is really what this is about. This is not a friendly game at all. You have a serious player.....do tell.

Yours in anticipation.
User avatar
Harvey Williamson
Posts: 2011
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
Full name: Harvey Williamson

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by Harvey Williamson »

Christopher Conkie wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:
Spock wrote:
tano-urayoan wrote: The only disagreement I could think of its related to time, that one team misses the deadline.
And no need for a referee there. If the teams go over the deadline a few times by a small margin, big deal. They can work that out as gentlemen.
But let's just suppose you want to join the CCC team the game has not started yet. My understanding is that you can not(unless you join team hiarcs) as the CCC?! team is now locked away on the Conkie forum - well all 7 of them - this is not a CCC team.
Anyone can still join the CCC team provided they are not in the Hiarcs team as well. Quite how one proves that when you cannot tell us or do not know the real names of your members is difficult to know. How do we know? How are we meant to know?

http://hiarcs.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2488&start=15

Once again you are using surnames irreverently Willy......

Is that how you operate in the Williamson forum these days?
That is the job of the referee you are starting to get it - he can examine IPs etc...
LOL

SteveB?

Examine IP's?

You will never know just how hilarious that is.....(or perhaps you do)......

Sam are you watching this? I hope you are.

Hahaha....well at least you made me laugh.

Please tell me how any neutral arbiter examines IP's

Must be the Stazi regards

Christopher

(LOL IP's.....very very funny :lol: )
Insane! As to the 1 question just as he has in all other games. Were you there?- I think not. Many were.
Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6073
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by Christopher Conkie »

Harvey Williamson wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:
Christopher Conkie wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:
Spock wrote:
tano-urayoan wrote: The only disagreement I could think of its related to time, that one team misses the deadline.
And no need for a referee there. If the teams go over the deadline a few times by a small margin, big deal. They can work that out as gentlemen.
But let's just suppose you want to join the CCC team the game has not started yet. My understanding is that you can not(unless you join team hiarcs) as the CCC?! team is now locked away on the Conkie forum - well all 7 of them - this is not a CCC team.
Anyone can still join the CCC team provided they are not in the Hiarcs team as well. Quite how one proves that when you cannot tell us or do not know the real names of your members is difficult to know. How do we know? How are we meant to know?

http://hiarcs.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2488&start=15

Once again you are using surnames irreverently Willy......

Is that how you operate in the Williamson forum these days?
That is the job of the referee you are starting to get it - he can examine IPs etc...
LOL

SteveB?

Examine IP's?

You will never know just how hilarious that is.....(or perhaps you do)......

Sam are you watching this? I hope you are.

Hahaha....well at least you made me laugh.

Please tell me how any neutral arbiter examines IP's

Must be the Stazi regards

Christopher

(LOL IP's.....very very funny :lol: )
Insane! As to the 1 question just as he has in all other games. Were you there - I think not. Many were.
Well tough luck. He won't be examining anyone's IP in our place ever.

It's too many numbers for him Harvey. He gets confused.

;-)
tano-urayoan
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by tano-urayoan »

Harvey Williamson wrote:Excellent. Perhaps you would be better playing team Conkie v CCC we have a serious player waiting so personally I would be happy to cancel.
You want a referee so we do not steal or sabotage your analysis. Now you called us unserious players. We are not titled players or experienced in correspondence play but we are in for the challenge and the fun of the get together. You are being disrespectful to us as players and persons. If this is your modus operandi...
User avatar
Harvey Williamson
Posts: 2011
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: Whitchurch. Shropshire, UK.
Full name: Harvey Williamson

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by Harvey Williamson »

tano-urayoan wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:Excellent. Perhaps you would be better playing team Conkie v CCC we have a serious player waiting so personally I would be happy to cancel.
You want a referee so we do not steal or sabotage your analysis. Now you called us unserious players. We are not titled players or experienced in correspondence play but we are in for the challenge and the fun of the get together. You are being disrespectful to us as players and persons. If this is your modus operandi...
yeah whatever - I have never played in any game at this level without an arbiter. But hey team Conkie knows best and maybe ccc should get a captain to play against team conkie - maybe the secret seven v the famous five i will supply lashings of ginger beer.
Christopher Conkie
Posts: 6073
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:34 pm
Location: Scotland

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by Christopher Conkie »

Harvey Williamson wrote:
tano-urayoan wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:Excellent. Perhaps you would be better playing team Conkie v CCC we have a serious player waiting so personally I would be happy to cancel.
You want a referee so we do not steal or sabotage your analysis. Now you called us unserious players. We are not titled players or experienced in correspondence play but we are in for the challenge and the fun of the get together. You are being disrespectful to us as players and persons. If this is your modus operandi...
yeah whatever - I have never played in any game at this level without an arbiter. But hey team Conkie knows best and maybe ccc should get a captain to play against team conkie - maybe the secret seven v the famous five i will supply lashings of ginger beer.
What level is that?

We have a new team member btw. Zach Wegner.

We thought you should know as we have nothing to hide.
tano-urayoan
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:23 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by tano-urayoan »

Harvey Williamson wrote:yeah whatever - I have never played in any game at this level without an arbiter. But hey team Conkie knows best and maybe ccc should get a captain to play against team conkie - maybe the secret seven v the famous five i will supply lashings of ginger beer.
Then this should be your first time... playing without an arbiter...new experiences
User avatar
slobo
Posts: 2331
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 5:36 pm

Re: CCC/CTF v Hiarcs Headbangers Game 1 (25/07/2009)

Post by slobo »

tano-urayoan wrote:
Harvey Williamson wrote:yeah whatever - I have never played in any game at this level without an arbiter. But hey team Conkie knows best and maybe ccc should get a captain to play against team conkie - maybe the secret seven v the famous five i will supply lashings of ginger beer.
Then this should be your first time... playing without an arbiter...new experiences
Why do you want an arbiter?
Are you afraid we may use a Rybka software?
"Well, I´m just a soul whose intentions are good,
Oh Lord, please don´t let me be misunderstood."