Except that the _implementation_ is a bit different. No non-public forum. No moving posts willy-nilly. NO editing. The charter is one thing. Following the charter is something else. Certainly unilaterally declaring that program X is a clone (with zero evidence) and disallowing discussion/links is not mentioned in the CCC charter anywhere that I am aware of.Graham Banks wrote:Jeremy has set up his new forum to cater for these demands. The posting rules there seem to be almost a direct cut and paste from the CCC charter.Sean Evans wrote:I under ChessUSA.com is worried about potential lawsuits for allowing links to derivative/clone programs and even discussion of these programs. However, it makes sense to me to have this forum moved to a server where the users can decide on the posting content rather than a third-party, that doesn't really care about computer chess or the computer chess Internet community.
Cordially,
Sean
Should CCC move to another server??
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL