Cfish another Stockfish derivative

[Gusev]

Will test, but the x64 files are too small, they don't look like profile builds, which is what I need for popcnt. Not being profile builds, they are unlikely to play well.

CFish_030417 x32-x64, x64_NUMA
done by ROMEOA23
http://www118.zippyshare.com/v/QCdfQw0o/file.html
https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/030417
link found here: http://immortal223.pozitiffchess.net/fo ... 74&page=26

[Dann Corbit]

Will test, but the x64 files are too small, they don't look like profile builds, which is what I need for popcnt. Not being profile builds, they are unlikely to play well.

CFish_030417 x32-x64, x64_NUMA
done by ROMEOA23
http://www118.zippyshare.com/v/QCdfQw0o/file.html
https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/030417
link found here: http://immortal223.pozitiffchess.net/fo ... 74&page=26

I built from source here, and they are within a whisker of asmfish on my machine in speed (both NPS and time to ply).

Using the existing makefile, I used this script:

Code: Select all

make profile-build ARCH=x86-64-modern COMP=mingw
strip cfish.exe
mv cfish.exe cfish-modern.exe
make profile-build ARCH=x86-64 COMP=mingw
strip cfish.exe
mv cfish.exe cfish-vanilla.exe

[MikeB]

macOS exe: https://www.dropbox.com/s/twekity1o6wsk ... 7.zip?dl=1

source: https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/branches/active

[Gusev]

Hi Stefan,

I made a profile-build popcnt Cfish compile from the branch https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/030417 updated by ChessMan3 yesterday and uploaded it to http://www.firenzina.org/cfish_x64_modern_080417.zip. It runs on my popcnt machine (Intel Corei7 930). Please see if you can run it, too!

Bad news. I stopped my 20"+0.5" test of the Cfish_x64_240317_modern_620gcc compile at the losing score of +0-41=26 against AsmFishW_2017-03-15_popcnt. I observed that Cfish spent its time much faster early on, then played on the increment and got in trouble. I will compare behaviors of my BMI2 compiles of Ronald's Cfish_2017-01-04 and the new Cfish_240317.

Oops. So, a testrun of Cfish makes no sense at the moment.
I will give Andscacs 0.90 a try, when the actual Stockfish-Testrun is finished. Perhaps it can take the place of Fire 4 as an opponent for my Stockfish-Testruns.

[Gusev]

I have also compiled and uploaded http://www.firenzina.org/cfish_x64_bmi2_080417.zip from the same code branch.

[pohl4711]

Hi Stefan,

I made a profile-build popcnt Cfish compile from the branch https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/030417 updated by ChessMan3 yesterday and uploaded it to http://www.firenzina.org/cfish_x64_modern_080417.zip. It runs on my popcnt machine (Intel Corei7 930). Please see if you can run it, too!

Bad news. I stopped my 20"+0.5" test of the Cfish_x64_240317_modern_620gcc compile at the losing score of +0-41=26 against AsmFishW_2017-03-15_popcnt. I observed that Cfish spent its time much faster early on, then played on the increment and got in trouble. I will compare behaviors of my BMI2 compiles of Ronald's Cfish_2017-01-04 and the new Cfish_240317.

Oops. So, a testrun of Cfish makes no sense at the moment.
I will give Andscacs 0.90 a try, when the actual Stockfish-Testrun is finished. Perhaps it can take the place of Fire 4 as an opponent for my Stockfish-Testruns.

Test of Cfish is running since some minutes. After 18 games, all seems OK (time usage, nps, search depth).

[Gusev]

Thank you very much for giving Cfish a chance! We'll see where it lands.

Hi Stefan,

I made a profile-build popcnt Cfish compile from the branch https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/030417 updated by ChessMan3 yesterday and uploaded it to http://www.firenzina.org/cfish_x64_modern_080417.zip. It runs on my popcnt machine (Intel Corei7 930). Please see if you can run it, too!

Bad news. I stopped my 20"+0.5" test of the Cfish_x64_240317_modern_620gcc compile at the losing score of +0-41=26 against AsmFishW_2017-03-15_popcnt. I observed that Cfish spent its time much faster early on, then played on the increment and got in trouble. I will compare behaviors of my BMI2 compiles of Ronald's Cfish_2017-01-04 and the new Cfish_240317.

Oops. So, a testrun of Cfish makes no sense at the moment.
I will give Andscacs 0.90 a try, when the actual Stockfish-Testrun is finished. Perhaps it can take the place of Fire 4 as an opponent for my Stockfish-Testruns.

Test of Cfish is running since some minutes. After 18 games, all seems OK (time usage, nps, search depth).

[Damir]

CFish_130417 x32-x64, x64_NUMA
+4 new patches (compared to CFish_030417)
Download : http://www98.zippyshare.com/v/1lRcU0YN/file.html
SRC included
GitHub: https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/130417

This compile is done by RomeoA23 on immortal forum.

http://immortal223.pozitiffchess.net/fo ... 74&page=27

[Gusev]

I made my x32, x64, x64_modern and x64_bmi2 profile-build compiles of Cfish from 2017-04-13 available at http://www.firenzina.org/cfish_2017-04-13_YC.zip. Three minor changes were needed to make the 32-bit compile. It so happened that I have 4 computers at home that match the 4 architecture options, so I was able to profile-build for all four. Enjoy Cfish!:)

CFish_130417 x32-x64, x64_NUMA
+4 new patches (compared to CFish_030417)
Download : http://www98.zippyshare.com/v/1lRcU0YN/file.html
SRC included
GitHub: https://github.com/ChessMan3/Cfish/tree/130417

This compile is done by RomeoA23 on immortal forum.

http://immortal223.pozitiffchess.net/fo ... 74&page=27

[pohl4711]

Test of Cfish is running since some minutes. After 18 games, all seems OK (time usage, nps, search depth).

Testrun of CFish 170408 finished.

http://spcc.beepworld.de

(Perhaps you have to clear your browsercache or reload the website)