Live Retest request Komodo 13.3 vs Stockfish 150220

[mwyoung]

End of Match.

DESKTOP-CORSAIR, Blitz 4min+1sec 0


1 Stockfish 150220 64 POPCNT +98 +24/=54/-2 63.75% 51.0/80
2 Komodo 13.3 64-bit -98 +2/=54/-24 36.25% 29.0/80

I'm running both K13.3 and SF11 against the supposedly best Lc0 network with the supposedly best settings on my new 32 core threadripper, using 48 threads for K and SF as that seems best for both on my hardware, one 2080 ti for Lc0, at 2' + 1". SF beat Lc0 by 19 Elo after nearly 200 games, perhaps not surprising given the hardware which favors the CPU engine, and so far Komodo is down 34 elo after 113 games. If that holds, that would make Komodo just 53 elo worse than SF11 vs. Lc0. Perhaps the reason is that Komodo and Stockfish are more similar than either one is to Lc0, and in general running against dissimilar engines tends to show lower rating gaps.

I just finished this test run with K13.3 playing Lc0 23.3 62435. Same TC as the retest match.

DESKTOP-CORSAIR, Blitz 4min+1sec 0


1 Lc0 v0.23.3+git.29c15a4 +30 +15/=57/-8 54.38% 43.5/80
2 Komodo 13.3 64-bit -30 +8/=57/-15 45.63% 36.5/80