Only at fast time controls AND/OR from dodgy openings.But still, ALL engines are losing games.
Does SF loses a game in Berlin, Ragozin or 1...e5 English mainline at long time controls on decent hardware? If so it should be easy to demonstrate, I am yet to see such game.
Shitty Laptop, shitty opening, very fast time control. Yeah, SF loses in those difficult conditions sometimesHere's Stockfish demonstrating his "almost" perfect chess
I am enjoying your demonstration on how imperfect current Stockfish even given a lot of time is. Some very interesting positions, thank you.The argument is not a 100 -0 sweep. Stop moving the goal post. The argument is Stockfish plays near perfect chess right now under TCEC LTC. And is within 200 Elo.
Still, I am not convinced it matters when it comes to playing from starting position. It seems in fact very possible that one could complicate the position enough for SF to miss something important. On the other hand if that was the case we would be seeing people or other engines sometimes stumbling into those magical ideas. As it is correspondence was dead even before SF12 came along and clicking around mainline openings it seems very very hard to get even a glimmer of hope for an interesting (in computer chess sense) game. My intuition is that drawing margin is just too big from starting position. You will keep finding positions which are very close between drawing/losing and SF will always (well, for a long time anyway) get some of them wrong. The problem is it seems very hard to get anything like that from starting position as all the mainlines end in somewhat worse but still far away from QP vs Q endgames.