Frank Quisinsky wrote: ↑Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:58 am
If a clone programmer set an easy contempt parameter will be the clone directly 20 Elo stronger as the original.
Others wonder, why is the clone stronger as the original?
That's not a big secret!
You try it again and again with aggressive messages against my person.
I like the work you do and have fun with it.
Not important for me what you wrote, you got the "Tip" hint on my link selection.
Same I would like to do if you wrote here ... Quisinsky is an asshhole.
Over 10 persons asked me last year ...
Frank, why you gave a person like Günther Simon the TIP hint on your link selection.
I gave the answere, Günther made a good work and his opinion about my person isn't important for me.
Before I got the next messages with the same question!
There is no contempt anymore in SF since quite long, because nnue is more stable here and most cloners use the current nnue version nowadays.
There is not ONE single clone known, which produces better results than original SF (except using esoteric test conditions in non-statistical invalid tests).
Why this has anything to do with your person also escapes me, please don't develop some kind of paranoia?
If a clone programmer set an easy contempt parameter will be the clone directly 20 Elo stronger as the original.
Others wonder, why is the clone stronger as the original?
That's not a big secret!
The above quote is nonsense and completely unproven just imagined, otherwise you would have quoted a reliable source for it,
which doesn't exist. I really don't understand why you try to attack me and instead defend the cloners?
If you don't like SF just don't use it.
I have nothing aginst you, I just don't like untruth. Please remain straight with facts and not 'feelings'.
BTW I have no clue what you mean with the 'TIP' you mention?