90+30 Albin gambit

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson

User avatar
Rubinus
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Prague
Full name: Pavel Háse

90+30 Albin gambit

Post by Rubinus »

http://www.phcel.cz
4 cpu-bmi, syzygy, 10 engines
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.de5
a) Ne7
b) d4 4.Nd2
c) d4 4.g3
d) d4 4.a3
e) d4 4.Nf3
User avatar
Rubinus
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Prague
Full name: Pavel Háse

Re: 90+30 Albin gambit

Post by Rubinus »

Image
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.de5 Ne7
While the last move is the best according to Stockfish, I find it completely unpromising.
Pawn-less with more or less virtual compensation. Only the Stockfish didn't lose it once... -> white-black +33=57-0. And Dragon doesn't really, not even with Stockfish. So I guess it's not a lost cause. Seer surprised, maybe the longer times suit him better than his competitors, while Revenge confirms that crooked positions don't suit him - maybe the net isn't trained enough for them.

Next 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5 3.de5 d4 4.Nd2
User avatar
Rubinus
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Prague
Full name: Pavel Háse

Re: 90+30 Albin gambit

Post by Rubinus »

Image
1.d4 d5 2,c4 e5 3.de5 d4 4.Nd2
white-black 27:4=59 (59,44%)

A bit late, I'm watching Ukraine more now...
Rubichess loses on time sometimes, which distorts the whole tournament. Although only twice here, at 15+10 pace in another tournament it's more common. I don't want to stop the whole thing, cancel his games and let him finish them with the new version.
User avatar
Rubinus
Posts: 1161
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Prague
Full name: Pavel Háse

Re: 90+30 Albin gambit

Post by Rubinus »

Image
Table link on postimage

games

Dragon hasn't lost once against Stockfish. So it's probably not a losing opening, but black's role is very difficult. +149=294-7
The balance is somewhat distorted by Rubichess2021's overtime losses, though there are fewer of them here, as in the 15+10 pace. The problem is not completely solved in the 2022 version either, although there are considerably fewer of those cases.
RubiChess
Posts: 562
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:20 am
Full name: Andreas Matthies

Re: 90+30 Albin gambit

Post by RubiChess »

Rubinus wrote: Sat Apr 09, 2022 10:54 pm The balance is somewhat distorted by Rubichess2021's overtime losses, though there are fewer of them here, as in the 15+10 pace. The problem is not completely solved in the 2022 version either, although there are considerably fewer of those cases.
I already asked you for more information here forum3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=78885&p=920997#p920997
As long as you ignore this, I cannot do anything to solve the problem (if there is one, nobody else seems to mention time losses for Rubi).

Regards, Andreas