chessengeria.com - now online

[Dariusz]

I invite you to visit https://chessengeria.com

After many months of hard work, it's now online

Chess engines news, ratings, matches, tournaments, videos and download centre.
Analysis, articles and premium content.
Forums, Groups and comments.
Stories, tools, courses ChessBase, Chess Assistant, Scid vs. PC and more.
Play and watch live chess.

And also reviews, including a review of latest Hiarcs Chess Explorer Pro.

I will be very pleased if you visit my site.

[Guenther]

I invite you to visit https://chessengeria.com

After many months of hard work, it's now online :)

Chess engines news, ratings, matches, tournaments, videos and download centre.
Analysis, articles and premium content.
Forums, Groups and comments.
Stories, tools, courses ChessBase, Chess Assistant, Scid vs. PC and more.
Play and watch live chess.

And also reviews, including a review of latest Hiarcs Chess Explorer Pro.

I will be very pleased if you visit my site.

https://www.chessengeria.com/engine-list


Well, the engines list is (a very slightly modified) copy/ripoff from my XB/UCI chronology,
including a very big error, because you deleted the wrong column to a header...
when removing columns you were not interested in.
(you also included a temporary oversight by me, which I repaired later by removing Xoron,
see TOC last entry for 'Removed!')

I should add that you didn't even ask, if...?
You know that everyone can apply filters to every header even with read/only access to my chronology,
if one knows what filters are at all?
So 'your' filters remain pathetic. You really recycled everything, the only thing you 'added' were
the CCRL rating numbers replacing my rating classes, which I used intentionally, because those
are much better than pseudo precise numbers (error margins etc.!) and give a better overview
and don't feed the 'rat race' too much.

I really don't know what to say and how to react.

[Dariusz]

I invite you to visit https://chessengeria.com

After many months of hard work, it's now online

Chess engines news, ratings, matches, tournaments, videos and download centre.
Analysis, articles and premium content.
Forums, Groups and comments.
Stories, tools, courses ChessBase, Chess Assistant, Scid vs. PC and more.
Play and watch live chess.

And also reviews, including a review of latest Hiarcs Chess Explorer Pro.

I will be very pleased if you visit my site.

https://www.chessengeria.com/engine-list


Well, the engines list is (a very slightly modified) copy/ripoff from my XB/UCI chronology,
including a very big error, because you deleted the wrong column to a header...
when removing columns you were not interested in.
(you also included a temporary oversight by me, which I repaired later by removing Xoron,
see TOC last entry for 'Removed!')

I should add that you didn't even ask, if...?
You know that everyone can apply filters to every header even with read/only access to my chronology,
if one knows what filters are at all?
So 'your' filters remain pathetic. You really recycled everything, the only thing you 'added' were
the CCRL rating numbers replacing my rating classes, which I used intentionally, because those
are much better than pseudo precise numbers (error margins etc.!) and give a better overview
and don't feed the 'rat race' too much.

I really don't know what to say and how to react.

I'm afraid there has been some confusion on your part.
As far as I can see the RWBC XB/UCI Chronology table contains a very large number of different data.
The list I created contains only basic stuff and this data is much less than in your list : engine name, CCRL ranking, source code information (which is not in your list), etc.
Where is the copy here ?!

My site is the fruit of many months of my work and my work only.
If you are so disturbed by this basic list on my site - I will simply remove it. Although I don't understand the motive of your post: this engine list is not and is not supposed to be a competition for RWBC.

Respect, Darius.

[Guenther]

I invite you to visit https://chessengeria.com

After many months of hard work, it's now online :)

Chess engines news, ratings, matches, tournaments, videos and download centre.
Analysis, articles and premium content.
Forums, Groups and comments.
Stories, tools, courses ChessBase, Chess Assistant, Scid vs. PC and more.
Play and watch live chess.

And also reviews, including a review of latest Hiarcs Chess Explorer Pro.

I will be very pleased if you visit my site.

https://www.chessengeria.com/engine-list


Well, the engines list is (a very slightly modified) copy/ripoff from my XB/UCI chronology,
including a very big error, because you deleted the wrong column to a header...
when removing columns you were not interested in.
(you also included a temporary oversight by me, which I repaired later by removing Xoron,
see TOC last entry for 'Removed!')

I should add that you didn't even ask, if...?
You know that everyone can apply filters to every header even with read/only access to my chronology,
if one knows what filters are at all?
So 'your' filters remain pathetic. You really recycled everything, the only thing you 'added' were
the CCRL rating numbers replacing my rating classes, which I used intentionally, because those
are much better than pseudo precise numbers (error margins etc.!) and give a better overview
and don't feed the 'rat race' too much.

I really don't know what to say and how to react.

I'm afraid there has been some confusion on your part.
As far as I can see the RWBC XB/UCI Chronology table contains a very large number of different data.
The list I created contains only basic stuff and this data is much less than in your list : engine name, CCRL ranking, source code information (which is not in your list), etc.
Where is the copy here ?!

My site is the fruit of many months of my work and my work only.
If you are so disturbed by this basic list on my site - I will simply remove it. Although I don't understand the motive of your post: this engine list is not and is not supposed to be a competition for RWBC.

Respect, Darius.

You created no list and the confusion is on your side.
You copied all work from my chronology and then removed some columns, everyone can see this.

Obviously you didn't even understand what you copied, because you removed falsely a correct column
and applied the wrong header. I disabled this column now in the XB/UCI chronology too, until you admit
this at least. It seems you still didn't realize this error despite my description, are you serious?
That's really funny along with the 'Xoron' case, which I compiled erroneously again and removed when I noticed my error.
It's like cloning an engine with a very visible bug.

Sorry for all honest users for now...

[Frank Quisinsky]

Dariusz,

I saw Wasp on your site!
Maybe I forget to added it on Wasp site?

Do you asked John Stanback?

In all the years computer chess I saw it again and again.

Example:
Arena on so many pages are available in times I am working with Martin Blume.
Never with a aggreement from us.

We are thinking at these times ...
Let the others just use our years of work!
Never we say anything, peace be with you!!

In Winboard times I asked every person for the aggreement for each of all the engines I added on the Winboard site. I asked every person for each of all the tourreys I added and for each other information / news. That was really a very hard work to search the contacts to others for building a strong website ... a very hard work!!

Best
Frank

[Dariusz]

I invite you to visit https://chessengeria.com

After many months of hard work, it's now online

Chess engines news, ratings, matches, tournaments, videos and download centre.
Analysis, articles and premium content.
Forums, Groups and comments.
Stories, tools, courses ChessBase, Chess Assistant, Scid vs. PC and more.
Play and watch live chess.

And also reviews, including a review of latest Hiarcs Chess Explorer Pro.

I will be very pleased if you visit my site.

https://www.chessengeria.com/engine-list


Well, the engines list is (a very slightly modified) copy/ripoff from my XB/UCI chronology,
including a very big error, because you deleted the wrong column to a header...
when removing columns you were not interested in.
(you also included a temporary oversight by me, which I repaired later by removing Xoron,
see TOC last entry for 'Removed!')

I should add that you didn't even ask, if...?
You know that everyone can apply filters to every header even with read/only access to my chronology,
if one knows what filters are at all?
So 'your' filters remain pathetic. You really recycled everything, the only thing you 'added' were
the CCRL rating numbers replacing my rating classes, which I used intentionally, because those
are much better than pseudo precise numbers (error margins etc.!) and give a better overview
and don't feed the 'rat race' too much.

I really don't know what to say and how to react.

I'm afraid there has been some confusion on your part.
As far as I can see the RWBC XB/UCI Chronology table contains a very large number of different data.
The list I created contains only basic stuff and this data is much less than in your list : engine name, CCRL ranking, source code information (which is not in your list), etc.
Where is the copy here ?!

My site is the fruit of many months of my work and my work only.
If you are so disturbed by this basic list on my site - I will simply remove it. Although I don't understand the motive of your post: this engine list is not and is not supposed to be a competition for RWBC.

Respect, Darius.

You created no list and the confusion is on your side.
You copied all work from my chronology and then removed some columns, everyone can see this.

Obviously you didn't even understand what you copied, because you removed falsely a correct column
and applied the wrong header. I disabled this column now in the XB/UCI chronology too, until you admit
this at least. It seems you still didn't realize this error despite my description, are you serious?
That's really funny along with the 'Xoron' case, which I compiled erroneously again and removed when I noticed my error.
It's like cloning an engine with a very visible bug.

Sorry for all honest users for now...

Guenther, where does the aggression you show and the lack of respect for the work of others come from ?

We don't know each other and you are so unkind. By what right? Do you lack any emotion, do you like unconstructive criticism? Or maybe you feel unappreciated ? Or maybe you just don't accept the fact that someone unknown has done something cool, different and fresh in this topic ?

chessengeria contains 100 times more content than one list.
If I wanted to (but it's not my goal) I would make a much more accurate list with much more actual data than what you have in your list.

After your absurd post I will remove my list which, I repeat, contains only basic information. I have no intention of reading any more of your ridiculous posts.
It is a pity that you did not write to me in a private message; surely we would have clarified everything.

[Dariusz]

Dariusz,

I saw Wasp on your site!
Maybe I forget to added it on Wasp site?

Do you asked John Stanback?

In all the years computer chess I saw it again and again.

Example:
Arena on so many pages are available in times I am working with Martin Blume.
Never with a aggreement from us.

We are thinking at these times ...
Let the others just use our years of work!
Never we say anything, peace be with you!!

In Winboard times I asked every person for the aggreement for each of all the engines I added on the Winboard site. I asked every person for each of all the tourreys I added and for each other information / news. That was really a very hard work to search the contacts to others for building a strong website ... a very hard work!!

Best
Frank

Frank, I have not found anywhere that Wasp can only be downloaded from https://www.amateurschach.de/

In the file: release_notes.txt it says "License: This chess engine is free for anyone to use.".

If John decides that the only place to download his engine is from https://www.amateurschach.de/ then I will immediately remove Wasp from my site.

[mar]

well the list you removed minutes ago was indeed a ripoff of the RBWC chronology - it didn't contain engines like Fire which "your" list doesn't contain either

I'm sure that if you did the right thing in the first place - namely to ask Guenther for permission to use his data and give proper credit - that he would have no problem whatsoever with your web

also I don't see any aggression here...

[Guenther]

...

Guenther, where does the aggression you show and the lack of respect for the work of others come from ?

We don't know each other and you are so unkind. By what right? Do you lack any emotion, do you like unconstructive criticism? Or maybe you feel unappreciated ? Or maybe you just don't accept the fact that someone unknown has done something cool, different and fresh in this topic ?

chessengeria contains 100 times more content than one list.
If I wanted to (but it's not my goal) I would make a much more accurate list with much more actual data than what you have in your list.

After your absurd post I will remove my list which, I repeat, contains only basic information. I have no intention of reading any more of your ridiculous posts.
It is a pity that you did not write to me in a private message; surely we would have clarified everything.

I know exactly what you did and what you copied, so don't spread more fake drama
and it's funny you see truth as aggression, why did you lie in the first place?
(you have copied everything and just removed/disabled columns, I can make your copy available as a future
warning to other fake copies - at least you realized that you mixed up 'first released version' with 'last released version'
and deleted that after my post, lol)

I have saved what you have copied from my chronology and I really don't care for all the other content
of your site, as I was only speaking about the 'engines list'.
It's beyond my understanding why you still deny what you did. You saved/copied data, which is nowhere else, word by word
and w/o even knowing the meaning of it, that's hilarious. Yes it's absurd, what you did and couldn't confess.

[Frank Quisinsky]

https://www.amateurschach.de/main/_impressum.htm

End of site!

Best
Frank