BTW, made a post
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderator: Ras
Fixed, E8 is now engine analysis window.towforce wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:07 amsmatovic wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:34 amFeel free to take a look and tinker:
https://computerchess.club
user: guesthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtPk5IUbdH0
pw: guest1234
Good work - that looks really nice - like suddenly moving forward 10 years into the future!![]()
I can actually see the FEN board - something I haven't been able to do here for a long time.
In the PGN, the analysis board is missing (an important feature for a weak player like myself to quickly understand why "the obvious move" doesn't work), but I'm sure that can be fixed.
smatovic wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 10:33 amFixed, E8 is now engine analysis window.towforce wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:07 amsmatovic wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 7:34 amFeel free to take a look and tinker:
https://computerchess.club
user: guesthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtPk5IUbdH0
pw: guest1234
Good work - that looks really nice - like suddenly moving forward 10 years into the future!![]()
I can actually see the FEN board - something I haven't been able to do here for a long time.
In the PGN, the analysis board is missing (an important feature for a weak player like myself to quickly understand why "the obvious move" doesn't work), but I'm sure that can be fixed.
--
Srdja
As far as I know, Quentin was asked by HGM to quantify the amount of money he wanted (Quentin had suggested he was willing to part with the forum in exchange for money). I believe that HGM didn't get the courtesy of a reply to that question either.Eelco de Groot wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:33 am Hi everyone, just a comment on your posts and Graham's link;
It says there that Carlos Aristy has been working at Your Move Chess & Games as CEO for eight years. So that is not a recent development. It also says, on the same page, that Quentin Turner is President of the company. I don't know much about it but is that not usually higher than the CEO when it comes to more strategic decisions. It varies greatly I suppose but at the face of it, I would say the decision (to sell a domain) would be more for the President. Both titles do not say who actually is the owner I would say, but not my field. Also, Whois apparently does not give you the holder name anymore -for privacy reasons maybe?-.
I get my knowledge solely from reading a similar discussion a while ago where they thought AliBaba was the owner of Rab https://hiking-site.nl/prikbord/index.p ... ost-174843
Quentin Turner is also on LinkedIn, I'm not, sorry guys, I can not read it.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/quentin-turner-23399570
Basically I thought this discussion was moved elsewhere for being so silent...But we are also waiting for a reply from HGM who was supposed to answer first to an e-mail from Quentin where he had expressed wishes to sell the domain.
I also voted 'no'...just mainly because the history is so important. Solve that...and I would be okay with changing to yes.towforce wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 8:17 amModern Times wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2023 1:42 amCan we ? Look at the poll results, there is no majority for that action. The "Yes" and "No" vote counts are the same, and "Yes" is only 43%.
Good point. I know of at least two of us who voted "no" who might be changing our minds, though (myself and Srdja).