Completely 100% fair.
Lesson Learned: when building a website (or other project) on which multiple people are involved, make sure that all contributors are able to communicate with everyone else, and that multiple people have admin keys.
Edit: this post landed at the top of a new page, so here's a view showing the previous post this responds to - link.
@CPW contributors
Moderators: hgm, Rebel, chrisw
-
- Posts: 11873
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: Birmingham UK
Re: @CPW contributors
The simple reveals itself after the complex has been exhausted.
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:58 am
- Location: Australia
- Full name: Nguyen Hong Pham
Re: @CPW contributors
Do you have any official source?
Otherwise, I guess (and hope) it is not.
About a year ago, I was worried much about his sudden silence and tried all the ways I could to search and contact him, just to know if he was OK. Then he replied that he was fine and attending a bike tour around Germany. Thus I think he was tired and might quit chess.
Just let him alone!
https://banksiagui.com
The most features chess GUI, based on opensource Banksia - the chess tournament manager
The most features chess GUI, based on opensource Banksia - the chess tournament manager
-
- Posts: 42666
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: @CPW contributors
Hopefully that's the case. I wasn't meaning any disrespect.phhnguyen wrote: ↑Sat Jun 29, 2024 12:04 pmDo you have any official source?
Otherwise, I guess (and hope) it is not.
About a year ago, I was worried much about his sudden silence and tried all the ways I could to search and contact him, just to know if he was OK. Then he replied that he was fine and attending a bike tour around Germany. Thus I think he was tired and might quit chess.
Just let him alone!
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Full name: Srdja Matovic
Re: @CPW contributors
Found a list of added users since the migration in 2018:
https://www.chessprogramming.org/Special:Log/newusers
Soepel (team SF) has an account, Crem (team Lc0) has an account, Ed Schroeder (see sticky post in main forum) has an account, I can not help if people are not interested in maintaining at least the articles of their own engines....or CPW as a whole.
Seems members of core team are Mark Lefler, Gerd Isenberg and Erik Satie. Gerd is since mid-2022 not active, AFAIK Mark Lefler (with Larry Kaufman) will retire 2025 from Komodo Chess.
--
Srdja
https://www.chessprogramming.org/Special:Log/newusers
Soepel (team SF) has an account, Crem (team Lc0) has an account, Ed Schroeder (see sticky post in main forum) has an account, I can not help if people are not interested in maintaining at least the articles of their own engines....or CPW as a whole.
Seems members of core team are Mark Lefler, Gerd Isenberg and Erik Satie. Gerd is since mid-2022 not active, AFAIK Mark Lefler (with Larry Kaufman) will retire 2025 from Komodo Chess.
--
Srdja
-
- Posts: 2251
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:47 pm
- Location: Hattingen, Germany
Re: @CPW contributors
Nope, still alive and riding my ebike.
-
- Posts: 42666
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: @CPW contributors
Great to hear. Sorry about my perhaps thinking otherwise.Gerd Isenberg wrote: ↑Wed Jul 03, 2024 10:26 pmNope, still alive and riding my ebike.
gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Lund
- Full name: Alessandro Iavicoli
Re: @CPW contributors
I have access to CPW since I gave my small contributions on the Perry results page.
If there’s anything in particular I can do to improve or increase the quality of CPW I’m happy to do it, as long as I have the competence for it
If there’s anything in particular I can do to improve or increase the quality of CPW I’m happy to do it, as long as I have the competence for it
-
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Full name: Srdja Matovic
Re: @CPW contributors
I suggested to divide topics/engines amongst contributors, thus, just pick a topic that suits you and you are interested in? In the end it is a hobby and we want to have good time, or alike.
Shawn Xu started to update search related articles (probably partially taken from CPW 2.0):
https://www.chessprogramming.org/index. ... &limit=500
There must be other active computer chess programmers/contributors out there, maybe they can join CPW too and revive it?
--
Srdja
PS: It is a difference to write a post on TC (or Discord for that matter) and a Wiki article. To do it in professional manner can require quite some time, to research things and give references. But how does the saying go, when you can explain something in your own words you have grasped it?
-
- Posts: 2935
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
- Full name: Srdja Matovic
Re: @CPW contributors
I am not aware of a CPW contributions guideline, but here the five pillars of Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars
I think the neutral aspect is important in context of engines and people, the difference of "descriptive, normative, evaluative" writing comes up in my mind.
And, when writing on article I perform a mind-game, to be able to give for every statement a reference, then consider if reference is necessary or not.
And here a reminder to myself (I am not a native English speaker, a lot of typos and bad wording) to cross-check my typing and wording before publishing.
Further note, CPW content is currently under CC-BY-SA 3.0 license:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Something like this. Idk what the CPW core team considers as CPW guideline. Maybe one of the core members can create an contribution guide article?
--
Srdja
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars
I think the neutral aspect is important in context of engines and people, the difference of "descriptive, normative, evaluative" writing comes up in my mind.
And, when writing on article I perform a mind-game, to be able to give for every statement a reference, then consider if reference is necessary or not.
And here a reminder to myself (I am not a native English speaker, a lot of typos and bad wording) to cross-check my typing and wording before publishing.
Further note, CPW content is currently under CC-BY-SA 3.0 license:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Something like this. Idk what the CPW core team considers as CPW guideline. Maybe one of the core members can create an contribution guide article?
--
Srdja
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 6:08 am
- Location: U.S.A
- Full name: Andrew Grant
Re: @CPW contributors
Someone should let wikipedia know about their own 5 pillars:smatovic wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 4:01 pm I am not aware of a CPW contributions guideline, but here the five pillars of Wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars
I think the neutral aspect is important in context of engines and people, the difference of "descriptive, normative, evaluative" writing comes up in my mind.
And, when writing on article I perform a mind-game, to be able to give for every statement a reference, then consider if reference is necessary or not.
And here a reminder to myself (I am not a native English speaker, a lot of typos and bad wording) to cross-check my typing and wording before publishing.
Further note, CPW content is currently under CC-BY-SA 3.0 license:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en
Something like this. Idk what the CPW core team considers as CPW guideline. Maybe one of the core members can create an contribution guide article?
--
Srdja
> Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
When you can't win an argument, you censor it.