Amazing results of LeelaKnightOdds-Dev

[Father]

Uri, both your games and Larry Kaufman's that we have observed here, do not have any glaring errors... for the time controls, in my knowledge and understanding, which is no more than that of a critic and interpreter of the scientific game, they are excellent human productions of chess art... Furthermore, if we place the games of the world championships in classical time, under the magnifying glass of supercomputers, the rating will undoubtedly deteriorate for the human under a superhuman magnifying glass or beyond the human.

I disagree.
The games have tactical calculation mistakes.

In the case of my loss against human opponent I did not show the full game but only part of it when I made the mistake.
In my case I can explain pshychological reason for playing the blunder h3+ too fast because my opponent did not play a move that I considered illogical so I did not suspect that I miss something and also I had no alternative that seems to me good after not thinking much(I thought that without my h pawn white has the advantage because of better pawn structure so I did not consider except h3+ other move except Be7 that I rejected as too passive).

[d]r3r1k1/pp3p1p/2pb4/3p3q/6np/1PNPP1P1/PBR2PK1/3Q3R b - - 1 20

The unlucky thing for me is the fact that white can reply Kg1 against h3+ so the main time that I used was to look at this line earlier and did not check the line h3+ Rxh3 to see if it is correct.

In case white had no move against h3+ except Rxh3 I probably could see that Rxh3 is strong because I could check Rxh3 for more time and see that the line is bad for me and think more about other alternatives and maybe could find Qg6(cannot check it)

My opponent told me after the game that he saw the full lines with Nxd1 some moves before I played h3+ and also saw the line that I did not play Qg6 Rxh4 Nxf2(Engines claim Nxe3+ is better but Nxf2 is also winning) but hoped he is going to find something else after Qg6.

He played the last moves relatively fast because he understood he had no good alternatives and it was also a good practical decision because I had less time to think on his time.

Uri I hope you have a good morning and day, in my country it is 10:25 p.m.
I would believe that chess games are ultimately lost due to tactical errors. But also because of the psychological implosion when one is as a human being faced with a frozen computer that has no compassion for us. That is, by collapse. And what I do not observe in those positions provided are any traces of collapse. I would believe that in such tactically complex positions in front of a computer, the
miracle for humans is to revive.

[Father]

Miracle for humans is to revive.
[/quote]

Buenos días Marcogio.

https://github.com/Marcogio9/LeelaQueenOdds-Leaderboard good morning. I hope you are well and continue well.
I wanted to check that when observing the number of ties registered in the user LeelaQueenOdds, a lower number of ties appears than the real one. Only with me
The result was 18 draws and 18 losses... when challenging Leela one has the alternative of placing "with points" or "friendly" is there a difference? Also in blue there are two alternatives in the text of challenges... they are different machines...: I see the opening lines differently...: Thank you very much for your help you can give me. Happy day.

[Father]

Miracle for humans is to revive.

Buenos días Marcogio.

https://github.com/Marcogio9/LeelaQueenOdds-Leaderboard good morning. I hope you are well and continue well.
I wanted to check that when observing the number of ties registered in the user LeelaQueenOdds, a lower number of ties appears than the real one. Only with me
The result was 18 draws and 18 losses... when challenging Leela one has the alternative of placing "with points" or "friendly" is there a difference? Also in blue there are two alternatives in the text of challenges... they are different machines...: I see the opening lines differently...: Thank you very much for your help you can give me. Happy day.
[/quote]

It's strange... only today I have 36 draws against 42 defeats for LeelaQueenOdds and the machine only registers 14 draws today... something strange happens

[Father]

[quote=Father post_id=975541 time=1737322023
[/quote]

** Today I finally had the opportunity to play a significant number of bullet 1'0" games against LeelaPieceOdds facing the chess computer, the machine playing without its two rooks and without its queen. The experience has been very pleasant, and I Most incredible of all is that despite the astronomical disadvantage in material, the computer manages to beat me in the face of carelessness!! Long live the queen!!

[Father]

[/quote]

Why do I play against LeelaPieces without a queen and the two rooks the machie.?

1- For the pleasure of facing AI.
2- For the joy of observing astonished that even under such astronomical differences in material, the computer continues to be "a sleeping lion."
3- For the satisfaction of being able to beat the computer, although not always under the time controls that I use, which is 1'0"
4- For having the obligation to prepare and develop a game plan and carry it out in a very short time.
5- For being able to develop the powers of logic and memory in my mind.
6- For having to be resistant in managing my own emotions.
7- For demanding that I achieve a result in the score against the machine.
8- Because it helps me understand artificial intelligence and my own intelligence.
9- For having a purpose in life.
10- For the gratitude of existing and being an intelligence in the midst of the creation made by the programmer of the finite, infinite, temporal, transient and eternal.