Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 - Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 Match Results

[ATOMICC]

http://atomicc-testing.blogspot.com/201 ... c-hem.html

[gleperlier]

Thanks Brent.

It's interessing to see that we have here different results so that maybe stronger version of Vitruvius exists :

Brent :

Code: Select all

1   Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 1CPU        +25/=59/-16   54.5/100
2   Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 1CPU    +16/=59/-25   45.5/100

Gab & George :

Code: Select all

                             
1   Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64   +11  +18/=28/-16 51.61%   32.0/62 
2   Vitruvius version 1.12b    -11  +16/=28/-18 48.39%   30.0/62 

Code: Select all

1   Vitruvius_1.1C_x32   +28    +13/-9/=28   54.00%   27.0/50 
2   Rybka 4.1 w32        -28    +9/-13/=28   46.00%   23.0/50

Code: Select all

1   Vitruvius_1.01C_x32  +21  +14/-11/=25   53.00%   26.5/50 
2   Rybka 4.1 w32        -21  +11/-14/=25   47.00%   23.5/50

[ATOMICC]

Thanks Brent.

It's interessing to see that we have here different results so that maybe stronger version of Vitruvius exists :

Brent :

Code: Select all

1   Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 1CPU        +25/=59/-16   54.5/100
2   Vitruvius 1.11C HEM x64 1CPU    +16/=59/-25   45.5/100

Gab & George :

Code: Select all

                             
1   Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64   +11  +18/=28/-16 51.61%   32.0/62 
2   Vitruvius version 1.12b    -11  +16/=28/-18 48.39%   30.0/62 

Code: Select all

1   Vitruvius_1.1C_x32   +28    +13/-9/=28   54.00%   27.0/50 
2   Rybka 4.1 w32        -28    +9/-13/=28   46.00%   23.0/50

Code: Select all

1   Vitruvius_1.01C_x32  +21  +14/-11/=25   53.00%   26.5/50 
2   Rybka 4.1 w32        -21  +11/-14/=25   47.00%   23.5/50

Yes, that is interesting. I'm curious, though: What were the time controls, hardware speed, and other settings of your matches?

[gleperlier]

Difficult to compare, this is only a feelling.

First one
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=43538
Hardware : i7 2670QM
Time Control : 5 minutes KO
512 Mo Hash - Pawn Hash 64 Mo.
NoomenTestsuite2012.pgn

Second one
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... ight=rybka
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Rybka 4.1 used Nalimov)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games

Third one
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... ight=rybka
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Rybka 4.1 used Nalimov)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games

[ATOMICC]

The results are still interesting, Gabriel. Thanks for sharing.