and as a public service


A key update was the restoration of time management and other other patches that are working towards SF9.
https://github.com/MichaelB7/asmFish/re ... tag/021618
Moderator: Ras
No idea why though?MikeB wrote:A few updates were made this week at https://github.com/lantonov/asmFish
and as a public service :shock: , I made executables for all of the main OS , including Linux and macOS. There is no claim to glory for me in providing these binaries which is just perfectly fine with me ;-)
A key update was the restoration of time management and other other patches that are working towards SF9.
https://github.com/MichaelB7/asmFish/re ... tag/021618
I thank you , I was not aware they were making all OS versions , at one time I believe some were excludedGuenther wrote:No idea why though?MikeB wrote:A few updates were made this week at https://github.com/lantonov/asmFish
and as a public service, I made executables for all of the main OS , including Linux and macOS. There is no claim to glory for me in providing these binaries which is just perfectly fine with me
A key update was the restoration of time management and other other patches that are working towards SF9.
https://github.com/MichaelB7/asmFish/re ... tag/021618
All updates are compiled already at the original site:
https://github.com/lantonov/asmFish/tree/executables
No, it's just that Stockfish has improved since November.Dann Corbit wrote:Public service announcement number 2 (Look at the top graph):
http://www.sp-cc.de/
If you want the fastest and strongest Stockfish, it is almost certainly the Cfish variant.
Something bad happened to AsmFish. Or so it appears.
It has. But AsmFish used to maintain a 30 Elo lead over SF (for about a year or so). None of the recent tests show that. Not only Pohl's tests, but also CCRL tests, show that SF is now stronger than AsmFish. This is strange because the AF team moves all the improvements to SF forward to the new AsmFish versions. Why should the 30 Elo gap narrow to 0?syzygy wrote:No, it's just that Stockfish has improved since November.Dann Corbit wrote:Public service announcement number 2 (Look at the top graph):
http://www.sp-cc.de/
If you want the fastest and strongest Stockfish, it is almost certainly the Cfish variant.
Something bad happened to AsmFish. Or so it appears.
I updated the link with a version that has limitstrength activated ( play by Elo for all OS)) with the matefinder turned on (note higher node count for bench 7635114). I believe they normally do not publish the limit strength version on regular basis, Well just let's say , it was not readily apparent where they do keep i if they do. Also variety is activated in this version as well. Nice for human play.MikeB wrote:A few updates were made this week at https://github.com/lantonov/asmFish
and as a public service, I made executables for all of the main OS , including Linux and macOS. There is no claim to glory for me in providing these binaries which is just perfectly fine with me
A key update was the restoration of time management and other other patches that are working towards SF9.
https://github.com/MichaelB7/asmFish/re ... tag/021618
The versions CCRL tested are both from November. There have been just a couple of minor commits since then, incorporating some changes introduced in master in early December.Dann Corbit wrote:It has. But AsmFish used to maintain a 30 Elo lead over SF (for about a year or so). None of the recent tests show that. Not only Pohl's tests, but also CCRL tests, show that SF is now stronger than AsmFish.syzygy wrote:No, it's just that Stockfish has improved since November.Dann Corbit wrote: If you want the fastest and strongest Stockfish, it is almost certainly the Cfish variant.
Something bad happened to AsmFish. Or so it appears.
Not all, they pick and choose the commits from SF master and have their own, asmFish-specific ones, as well.Dann Corbit wrote:This is strange because the AF team moves all the improvements to SF forward to the new AsmFish versions.
Dann Corbit wrote:I still guess that CFish is the current strongest fish engine, but testing may prove me wrong. Unfortunately, CFish does not get much testing.
Now there's a useful public service announcement, thank you!PaulieD wrote:There is a more up to date site to get the latest ASM from...you will have to compile it yourself but everything you need is there.
https://github.com/Counterply/asmFish/commits/master
As I said, Stockfish has improved since November.Dann Corbit wrote:It has. But AsmFish used to maintain a 30 Elo lead over SF (for about a year or so). None of the recent tests show that. Not only Pohl's tests, but also CCRL tests, show that SF is now stronger than AsmFish. This is strange because the AF team moves all the improvements to SF forward to the new AsmFish versions. Why should the 30 Elo gap narrow to 0?syzygy wrote:No, it's just that Stockfish has improved since November.Dann Corbit wrote:Public service announcement number 2 (Look at the top graph):
http://www.sp-cc.de/
If you want the fastest and strongest Stockfish, it is almost certainly the Cfish variant.
Something bad happened to AsmFish. Or so it appears.