https://database.lichess.org/
I downloaded several 2019 PGN's. They contain about 30 million games each. When I make a selection on elo=2200+ (both players) the output is below 1%. Makes me wonder, either there are not many strong players or they maintain a non-standard elo rating.
Lichess question
Moderators: hgm, Dann Corbit, Harvey Williamson
Forum rules
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
This textbox is used to restore diagrams posted with the [d] tag before the upgrade.
Lichess question
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Re: Lichess question
Ratings are not far from real world.Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:43 pmhttps://database.lichess.org/
I downloaded several 2019 PGN's. They contain about 30 million games each. When I make a selection on elo=2200+ (both players) the output is below 1%. Makes me wonder, either there are not many strong players or they maintain a non-standard elo rating.
1% of 30 million games (by month) is 300 000 games (by month). Do you think that's "not many" ?
Re: Lichess question
Hi Ed,Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:43 pmhttps://database.lichess.org/
I downloaded several 2019 PGN's. They contain about 30 million games each. When I make a selection on elo=2200+ (both players) the output is below 1%. Makes me wonder, either there are not many strong players or they maintain a non-standard elo rating.
Are these engine games or human games? Human games I am not interested in...
Re: Lichess question
Human games only, will extract comp games later and make them available.Damir wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:43 pmHi Ed,Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:43 pmhttps://database.lichess.org/
I downloaded several 2019 PGN's. They contain about 30 million games each. When I make a selection on elo=2200+ (both players) the output is below 1%. Makes me wonder, either there are not many strong players or they maintain a non-standard elo rating.
Are these engine games or human games? Human games I am not interested in...
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
Re: Lichess question
1% is seldom manyVinvin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 6:31 pmRatings are not far from real world.Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:43 pmhttps://database.lichess.org/
I downloaded several 2019 PGN's. They contain about 30 million games each. When I make a selection on elo=2200+ (both players) the output is below 1%. Makes me wonder, either there are not many strong players or they maintain a non-standard elo rating.
1% of 30 million games (by month) is 300 000 games (by month). Do you think that's "not many" ?
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
-
Nay Lin Tun
- Posts: 700
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:34 am
Re: Lichess question
I am around 2100 in lichess, that makes top 3.5%.
If you filters 2200+for both players, it can be 1% of games. (mutual filter).
If you filters 2200+for both players, it can be 1% of games. (mutual filter).
- Attachments
-
- 29402568_1524647878.0594.png (27.99 KiB) Viewed 1145 times
Re: Lichess question
Need to be careful with the filtering - after filtering out games that terminated abnormally and with ELO > 2450 I ended up with 30,192 games for the June database ..Rebel wrote: ↑Mon Jul 08, 2019 4:43 pmhttps://database.lichess.org/
I downloaded several 2019 PGN's. They contain about 30 million games each. When I make a selection on elo=2200+ (both players) the output is below 1%. Makes me wonder, either there are not many strong players or they maintain a non-standard elo rating.