muppetmuppet wrote: ↑Fri Jul 10, 2020 7:08 pm
500n/s is very slow what is your sf dev nodes/sec? I get about 75% of sf speed on nnue. cccc seem to get about 60%. Some people get 50%.
SF11 bench gives 1.7 million nps.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
I think there is some confusion. StockFiNN 0.1 is public, but 0.2 is still in early access to patrons for a bit longer. The most recent good results of being like +30 or +40 elo to SF-dev is from the 0.2, and 0.1 is probably weaker. But having clearly named and versioned and increasing strength releases makes everything a lot easier for normal users than just releasing hundreds of nets and binaries and having to refer to everything by dates and checksums and file sizes.
jjoshua2 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 12:45 am
But having clearly named and versioned and increasing strength releases makes everything a lot easier for normal users
This should be an user choice, hiding 0.2 behind a paywall eliminates this choice.
jjoshua2 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 11, 2020 12:45 am
But having clearly named and versioned and increasing strength releases makes everything a lot easier for normal users
This should be an user choice, hiding 0.2 behind a paywall eliminates this choice.
Why? If you're seriously interested, you wouldn't really mind 3$/month (which, by the way is rather the min. abo for Leelenstein at same site of the given link, isn't it?) and it could help to support the development. I would pay something like that gladly for the becoming better and better nets only, in this way the engine could stay GPL legally and yet have a commercial and professional support, couldn't it? Same as for Fat Fritz?
Go StockFiNN go!