Feuerstein 0.4.5.1 : 2100

[Le Fou numerique]

Hi,

Feuerstein 0.4.5.1 first rating in the UEL: 2100.

PGN on the Division Poussin page

Code: Select all

Tournoi d'entrée HS-Book.abk
Le Fou numerique, 2007.05.10 - 2007.05.11
                             Score       1    2 
-------------------------------------------------
 1: Feuerstein 0.4.5.1     25.5 / 126   36w- 36b-
 2: Abrok 5.0               2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 3: Alaric 704              2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 4: Alfil 7.3               2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 5: Amyan 1.597             2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 6: Anechka 0.08            2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 7: AnMon 5.60              2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 8: Arasan 9.5              2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
 9: Aristarch 4.50          2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
10: Atlas 2.20              2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
11: BBChess 1.1             2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
12: Chispa 4.0.3            2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
13: Delfi 5.1               2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
14: Diablo 0.5.1            2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
15: Dragon 4.6              2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
16: Fruit 2.1               2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
17: Gaia 3.5                2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
18: Glaurung 1.2.1          2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
19: Hamsters 0.3            2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
20: Hermann 1.9             2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
21: Ktulu 4.2               2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
22: Madeleine 0.2           2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
23: Mediocre 0.32           2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
24: Monarch 1.7             2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
25: Movei 0.08.403          2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
26: Muse 0.899b             2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
27: Naum 2.0                2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
28: Patzer 3.80             2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
29: Pepito v1.59            2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
30: Pharaon 3.5.1           2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
31: Pupsi 0.18              2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
32: Spike 1.2 Turin         2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
33: SOS 5.1                 2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
34: Tao 5.6                 2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
35: Yace Paderborn          2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
36: Zappa 1.1               2.0 /  2    1b+  1w+
37: Colossus 2007a          1.5 /  2    1b+  1w=
38: GreKo 5.2.5             1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
39: Queen 3.09              1.5 /  2    1b+  1w=
40: Rotor 0.1a              1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
41: Ruffian 1.0.5           1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
42: Sjeng 12.13             1.5 /  2    1b+  1w=
43: SlowChess Blitz WV2.1   1.5 /  2    1b+  1w=
44: Snitch 1.6.2            1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
45: Lime 62                 1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
46: List 5.12               1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
47: LittleThought 1.00      1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
48: Ufim 8.02               1.5 /  2    1b+  1w=
49: Booot 4.13.1            1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
50: Matheus 2.3             1.5 /  2    1b=  1w+
51: AliChess 4.08           1.0 /  2    1b-  1w+
52: Nejmet 3.07             1.0 /  2    1b-  1w+
53: Arion 1.7               1.0 /  2    1b-  1w+
54: Tornado 1.0 Mainz       1.0 /  2    1b-  1w+
55: Aice 0.99.2             1.0 /  2    1b+  1w-
56: WJChess v1.64           1.0 /  2    1b+  1w-
57: Delphil 1.6c            1.0 /  2    1b=  1w=
58: Homer 2.0               1.0 /  2    1b+  1w-
59: Ayito 0.2.994           0.5 /  2    1b-  1w=
60: Twisted Logic 0.099x    0.5 /  2    1b-  1w=
61: Gibbon 2.32a            0.5 /  2    1b=  1w-
62: Adam 3.1                0.0 /  2    1b-  1w-
63: FluxII 0.7              0.0 /  2    1b-  1w-
64: FireFly 2.2.0           0.0 /  2    1b-  1w-
-------------------------------------------------
126 games: +57 =19 -50

Regards,
Patrick

[Tord Romstad]

Hello Patrick,

The link to Feuerstein on your page seems to be broken. "Die von Ihnen aufgerufene Seite wurde nicht gefunden", my browser says.

While I am talking to you, let me once more express my gratitude for the work you do in testing UCI engines of all strengths. There is no other rating list which provides an estimate of the strength of a new version of a UCI engine as rapidly as yours. Whenever I release a new version of my engine (like now!), I press the "refresh" button on your site a hundred times per day until I see the first results. I am sure lots of other programmers do the same.


Tord

[Graham Banks]

Hello Patrick,

While I am talking to you, let me once more express my gratitude for the work you do in testing UCI engines of all strengths. There is no other rating list which provides an estimate of the strength of a new version of a UCI engine as rapidly as yours.
Tord

I'd like to echo my agreement. Keep up the great work Patrick.

Regards, Graham.

[Le Fou numerique]

Hello Patrick,

The link to Feuerstein on your page seems to be broken. "Die von Ihnen aufgerufene Seite wurde nicht gefunden", my browser says.

Hi Tord,

The link is broken. I hope is not for a long time. Two days ago it works

Whenever I release a new version of my engine (like now!), I press the "refresh" button on your site a hundred times per day until I see the first results.
Tord

You must wait some days/hours

Now the 19th game has begun. Glaurung 2 - epsilon/2 (what a name!!) score 16/18.
There are 126 games in complet gauntlet. I think in 24h the first rating is out

Regards,
Patrick

[Tord Romstad]

The link is broken. I hope is not for a long time. Two days ago it works

OK, I hope it will work again soon.

Glaurung 2 - epsilon/2 (what a name!!)

Well, I've seen other programmers use version numbers like "1.99" for beta versions. As a mathematician, I found, "2-epsilon" both more elegant (why should the difference be exactly 0.01?) and more flexible (because I can continue with epsilon/2, epsilon/3, ... as long as I want).

On the other hand, it seems that lots of people miss the point and drop the minus sign, thus making the version number incomprehensible and stupid. Perhaps it wasn't a good idea after all.

I think in 24h the first rating is out

Just 24h? Very fast, as always.

Tord

[Uri Blass]

The link is broken. I hope is not for a long time. Two days ago it works

OK, I hope it will work again soon.

Glaurung 2 - epsilon/2 (what a name!!)

Well, I've seen other programmers use version numbers like "1.99" for beta versions. As a mathematician, I found, "2-epsilon" both more elegant (why should the difference be exactly 0.01?) and more flexible (because I can continue with epsilon/2, epsilon/3, ... as long as I want).

On the other hand, it seems that lots of people miss the point and drop the minus sign, thus making the version number incomprehensible and stupid. Perhaps it wasn't a good idea after all.

I think in 24h the first rating is out

Just 24h? Very fast, as always.

Tord

Flexibility is no problem with 1.99 because you can continue from 1.99 to 1.991 and 1.992 and 1.999 and 1.9991 if you want.

Note that I have mathematical background and I had no problem to understand the point.

I thought that maybe I should add delta inside the name of movei because you know that for every epsilon>0 there is delta>0...
but I think that as long as movei is weaker than glaurung it is not a good idea to use delta inside the name of it.

Uri

[Tord Romstad]

Flexibility is no problem with 1.99 because you can continue from 1.99 to 1.991 and 1.992 and 1.999 and 1.9991 if you want.

Yes, you can, but it seems a lot more arbitrary than 2-epsilon, 2-epsilon/2, and so on.

I thought that maybe I should add delta inside the name of movei because you know that for every epsilon>0 there is delta>0...
but I think that as long as movei is weaker than glaurung it is not a good idea to use delta inside the name of it.

I'm not so sure - based on the latest results from Jorge, there doesn't seem to be a big difference in strength between our engines.

Tord

[Le Fou numerique]

The link to Feuerstein on your page seems to be broken. "Die von Ihnen aufgerufene Seite wurde nicht gefunden", my browser says.

Tord

Hi Tord,

The page is now available: http://freenet-homepage.de/FritzSchach/

Regards,
Patrick