Hi,
In this thread I just want to express my point of view regarding this awesome engine by saying that the progress that is showing lately is simply scarey and I am strongly impressed from it's performance tournament after tournament
So even mentioning that Harvey has made something wrong in the last tournament is a total crap and I strongly opposite that
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
I agree ... I feel that if it were not for Rybka, then Hiarcs 11.1 would be 1st above all other engines. Zap!Chess, and Loop would be left to fight over the 2nd place spot.
"Good decisions come from experience, and experience comes from bad decisions."
__________________________________________________________________
Ted Summers
AdminX wrote:I agree ... I feel that if it were not for Rybka, then Hiarcs 11.1 would be 1st above all other engines. Zap!Chess, and Loop would be left to fight over the 2nd place spot.
Absolutely correct Ted,absolutely
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:mentioning that Harvey has made something wrong in the last tournament is a total crap and I strongly opposite that
Starting up a new thread to rehash an argument from another is not necessary Wael, but I do agree that Hiarcs is a fine engine.
I would ask members not to start arguing again over Harvey's actions in this thread.
Regards, Graham (moderation)
Huh?
Are there new guidelines in this forum now? Did I miss something? Why is it forbidden to talk about Hiarcs in WCRCC? I don't see anything offending in Waels post. I did not read the latest updates in the other thread, and of course peronal attacks should not be allowed, but I find it unwise from the moderators to censor certain topics away. As long as they are according to the charter.
If we are not able to talk about this stuff here anymore, we have to find another place...
Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:mentioning that Harvey has made something wrong in the last tournament is a total crap and I strongly opposite that
Starting up a new thread to rehash an argument from another is not necessary Wael, but I do agree that Hiarcs is a fine engine.
I would ask members not to start arguing again over Harvey's actions in this thread.
Regards, Graham (moderation)
Huh?
Are there new guidelines in this forum now? Did I miss something? Why is it forbidden to talk about Hiarcs in WCRCC? I don't see anything offending in Waels post. I did not read the latest updates in the other thread, and of course peronal attacks should not be allowed, but I find it unwise from the moderators to censor certain topics away. As long as they are according to the charter.
If we are not able to talk about this stuff here anymore, we have to find another place...
Thanks Andreas for the objective opinion
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
AdminX wrote:I agree ... I feel that if it were not for Rybka, then Hiarcs 11.1 would be 1st above all other engines. Zap!Chess, and Loop would be left to fight over the 2nd place spot.
It seems you forgot Hydra and Fruit.They are also equally 2nd and Thorsten's results show that Fruit scored better than Hiarcs in some tests but I'm not sure.
It would be better if Hiarcs don't miss any official tournament events.
