Zappa Mexico II/64 - Rybka 2.3.2a/64, 90m+30s

[Rubinus]

Zappa Mexico II/64 - Rybka 2.3.2a/64 25.0:39.0 (6:20=38)
Books: Rybka use RybkaII.ctg, Zappa g.1-32 Zap!chess.ctg and g.33-64 Perfect13.ctg.
1-32: 9.5:22.5
33-64: 15.5:16.5 (after cca game 48 Zappa +3!)
AMD Athlon64 3200+, 256MB hash, 90m+30s, GUI Fritz10, 345TB.
download games here

Compare:
a)
Zappa Mexico/64 - Rybka 2.3.2a/64 25.0:39.0 (3:17=44)
1-32: 12.5:19.5
33-64: 12.5:19.5
AMD Athlon64 3200+, 256MB hash, 90m+30s, GUI Fritz10, 345TB.
download games here
b)
Zappa Mexico/64 - Rybka 2.3.2a/64 23.0:41.0 (6:24=34)
1-32: 8.5:23.5
33-64: 14.5:17.5
Intel Core Duo T7500, 256MB hash, 90m+30s, GUI Fritz11, 345TB.
download games here

[ernest]

Books: Rybka use RybkaII.ctg, Zappa g.1-32 Zap!chess.ctg and g.33-64 Perfect13.ctg.

Hi Pavel,

Amazing result with Perfect13.ctg!

What Book Options did you use for RybkaII.ctg and Perfect13.ctg: Normal or Optimize?

[Rubinus]

Hi Ernest.
Ever normal. I like more variability.
Best wishes P.H.

[ernest]

Ever normal. I like more variability.

Same for me.
But then, with Blitz 4'+2", 100 games, I did not get your interesting Zappa result.

Zappa Mexico II/64 - Rybka 2.3.2a mp/64, 2 processors, no pondering, 34:66 (+12 -44 =44)
Books: Rybka uses RybkaII.ctg, Zappa Perfect13.ctg (Book Options = Normal)
Intel E6600 @3GHz, 512MB hash, 4m+2s, GUI ShredderClassic, 345TB.
Win XP Pro x64.

Your single AMD Athlon64 3200+ at 2 GHz, runs approx 3 times slower than my Intel double-core, but this still makes your 90'+30" time level 6-7 times longer than mine.
So maybe Zappa is really better (compared to Rybka) with more time...