Jouni wrote: ↑Tue Feb 03, 2026 12:19 pm
So Leela at 1000€ GPU loses to one core Stockfish . Leela project should be stopped/banned to wasting power ?
By this liogic you need to ban also all the other engines and maybe it is the opposite and stockfish project should be stopped/banned because stockfish is too strong and they need to stop to allow other to be able to be competitive?
Hote that I do not think somebody needs to stop because of chess results.
This is probably just Jouni's way to say that the testing environment of Rebel
- limiting a CPU engine to use 6,25% of a (max) 1000€ CPU (~62,50€)
- giving Leela the same 6,25% of the CPU (or even more? did he change the default of iirc 2 threads in Leela?) and 100% of a massively in parallel working > 1000€ GPU (>1062,50€)
is crap. Even without looking at energy consumption.
Never thought that I would agree with Jouni sometime.
RubiChess wrote: ↑Tue Feb 03, 2026 7:49 pm
This is probably just Jouni's way to say that the testing environment of Rebel
- limiting a CPU engine to use 6,25% of a (max) 1000€ CPU (~62,50€)
- giving Leela the same 6,25% of the CPU (or even more? did he change the default of iirc 2 threads in Leela?) and 100% of a massively in parallel working > 1000€ GPU (>1062,50€)
is crap. Even without looking at energy consumption.
Never thought that I would agree with Jouni sometime.
In your infinite wisdom, what's the right configuration of a fair GPU vs CPU match ?
I am pretty sure you won't find consensus.
90% of coding is debugging, the other 10% is writing bugs.
I don't think there is a fair configuration. That being said, I am a bit confused, on your site you write you are running the list with 16 cores and a 4080. So is Jouni mistaken and you are running these matches on 16 cores or is the information on your website misleading?
Regarding matches between CPU and GPU based engines, I would also appreciate if you would be transparent in your posts exactly which hardware and settings you are running in these matches. I shouldn't have to go to your website to find that information if you are already sharing numbers here. You are not the only person guilty of this, but as the topic arose and I respect you a lot I feel it is a good time to point it out.
RubiChess wrote: ↑Tue Feb 03, 2026 7:49 pm
This is probably just Jouni's way to say that the testing environment of Rebel
- limiting a CPU engine to use 6,25% of a (max) 1000€ CPU (~62,50€)
- giving Leela the same 6,25% of the CPU (or even more? did he change the default of iirc 2 threads in Leela?) and 100% of a massively in parallel working > 1000€ GPU (>1062,50€)
is crap. Even without looking at energy consumption.
Never thought that I would agree with Jouni sometime.
I have no problem with testing assuming the tester does not hide the conditions.
Even if some tester gives all engines 100 seconds per move and stockfish 1 second per move then I have no problem with it when the tester does not hide the conditions.
I see no problem with Odds.
Leela use material odds in games and
IMO hardware odds or time odds in computer-computer ganes are also no problem.