Doubtful what we call KI

Discussion of anything and everything relating to chess playing software and machines.

Moderator: Ras

Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7248
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Doubtful what we call KI

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi there,

when a bee hops from flower to flower we should give them the name KI ... if we like to give engines in addition the name KI.

What is KI for computer chess engines?

For me very simple:

An engine need two cores!
One core for learning from moves played by the opponent.
One's own strengths can be applied more effectively if, for example, it is quickly determined that the opponent must be stronger or weaker. In additional can be save from core 2 information about it in a log file. Can be nice to study for humans. With other words, often the second or third best move is better to play if a chess engines are able to analyze the opponent during a game.

Such things I like to give the name KI.
We are thousands of miles away from true KI.
Isn't it?

On the other hand, what our programmers like to do ... must be good!
It is allways the same ... to be good is good but never good enough!

:-)

Best
Frank
smatovic
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:18 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Full name: Srdja Matovic

Re: Doubtful what we call KI

Post by smatovic »

....a running gag was that "AI" is always that what we haven't solved (in computer science) yet.

--
Srdja