CCRL 40/40, 40/4 and FRC lists updated (16th September 2017)

[Graham Banks]

The latest CCRL Rating Lists and Statistics are available for viewing from the following links:
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/ (40/40)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404/ (40/4)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404FRC/ (FRC 40/4)

Please note that the three lists are often updated separately to each other. The FRC list is only updated when a new engine or engine version is being/has been tested.

40/40 testing this week that I'm aware of will include (with live broadcast port for TLCV noted where applicable):

Curse Of The Baby Snakes Tournament(continuing 16001)
66th Amateur Series Division 1 Tournament (continuing 16053)
66th Amateur Series Division 2 Tournament continuing 16002)
Zurichess Neuchatel 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16063)
RomiChess P3M 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing 16065)
ChessBrainVB 3.50 Gauntlet (continuing 16066)
SugaR XPrO 1.2 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing)
Demolito 2017-08-26 64-bit Gauntlet (finishing)
Nirvanachess 2.4 64-bit Gauntlet (continuing)
SCTR 1.0 64-bit Gauntlets (continuing)
Soldat III 0.210 64-bit Gauntet (starting)
Fire 6 64-bit Gauntlet (starting)
SugaR XPrO 1.2 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (continuing 16084)
Gap-filling 4CPU games (starting Thursday 16083)
Ghost 3.1 64-bit 4CPU Gauntlet (being run by Charles)

40/4 testing since the last update has included:

Rival 1.0.1 64-bit
Bagatur 1.5e 64-bit
Robocide 20170718 64-bit
RuyDos 1.0.27 64-bit
Magnum 4.0
RomiChess P3M 64-bit
Gunborg 1.35 64-bit
AdroitChess 0.4
Caligula 0.7
Anatoli 0.35k
Fruit 2.31
Gladiator 0.0.7
SCTR 1.0 64-bit
chess22k 1.5 64-bit

[Scacchista1977]

Sugar instead of Stockfish ?! .... sorry but this is absurd!

http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040/

[Damir]

Why is it absurd ? Stockfish is tested on various websites, Sugar is not.
Why not give another engine a chance ?

[Scacchista1977]

Why is it absurd ? Stockfish is tested on various websites, Sugar is not.
Why not give another engine a chance ?

I do not think right choice that Sugar substitutes Stockfish. In my opinion, Graham can test all the "derivatives" he believes, but why remove Stockfish 8 and place a "derivative" in his place?

[Vinvin]

Why is it absurd ? Stockfish is tested on various websites, Sugar is not.
Why not give another engine a chance ?

I do not think right choice that Sugar substitutes Stockfish. In my opinion, Graham can test all the "derivatives" he believes, but why remove Stockfish 8 and place a "derivative" in his place?

SF 8 is not removed, it stills in the complete list : http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html

[JJJ]

I guess they tested sugar ( Stockfish dev ) because Stockfish 9 is not coming anytime soon.

[Graham Banks]

Why is it absurd ? Stockfish is tested on various websites, Sugar is not.
Why not give another engine a chance ?

I do not think right choice that Sugar substitutes Stockfish. In my opinion, Graham can test all the "derivatives" he believes, but why remove Stockfish 8 and place a "derivative" in his place?

[Scacchista1977]

Ok, can i have the executable of this engine?
Thanks

[Modern Times]

Ok, can i have the executable of this engine?
Thanks

https://github.com/Zerbinati/SugaR/releases

[Scacchista1977]

Ok, can i have the executable of this engine?
Thanks

https://github.com/Zerbinati/SugaR/releases

Thank you!