CHAINSAW MASSACRE
Fritz 11 GUI
Intel Dual Core
Single Processor- 3.2ghz
128mb hash
3 & 4 man tablebases
Ponder & Learning = OFF
Perfect 12.32.ctg book for all (w/12 move CCRL Limit)
40 moves in 58 minutes repeating (adapted to CCRL 40/40)
All engines = 32 bit
RR = 4 cycles
44 rounds = 264 games
Round 26
Surprise 4.3b13 v Rival 1.18 (0-1)
Feuerstein 0.4.4.2 v BibiChess 0.5 (0-1)
Warrior 1.0.3 v Waxman 2008 draw
ECE 0.3 v Atak 6.2 (0-1)
Monarch 1.7 v BikJump 2.01 (1-0)
Buzz 0.07 v Gibbon 2.01b (0-1)
Round 27
Gibbon 2.01b v Surprise 4.3b13 (1-0)
BikJump 2.01 v Buzz 0.07 draw
Atak 6.2 v Monarch 1.7 (0-1)
Waxman 2008 v ECE 0.3 draw
BibiChess 0.5 v Warrior 1.0.3 draw
Rival 1.18 v Feuerstein 0.4.4.2 (0-1)
Round 28
Surprise 4.3b13 v Feuerstein 0.4.4.2 (1-0)
Warrior 1.0.3 v Rival 1.18 (1-0)
ECE 0.3 v BibiChess 0.5 (0-1)
Monarch 1.7 v Waxman 2008 (0-1)
Buzz 0.07 v Atak 6.2 (1-0)
Gibbon 2.01b v BikJump 2.01 draw
Round 29
BikJump 2.01 v Surprise 4.3b13 (1-0)
Atak 6.2 v Gibbon 2.01b (0-1)
Waxman 2008 v Buzz 0.07 (1-0)
BibiChess 0.5 v Monarch 1.7 draw
Rival 1.18 v ECE 0.3 (1-0)
Feuerstein 0.4.4.2 v Warrior 1.0.3 (1-0)
Round 30
Surprise 4.3b13 v Warrior 1.0.3 (1-0)
ECE 0.3 v Feuerstein 0.4.4.2 (0-1)
Monarch 1.7 v Rival 1.18 (0-1)
Buzz 0.07 v BibiChess 0.5 (0-1)
Gibbon 2.01b v Waxman 2008 (1-0)
BikJump 2.01 v Atak 6.2 (0-1)
Standings thru Round 30
21.5- Waxman 2008
19.5- Monarch 1.7
19.0- BibiChess 0.5
17.5- Atak 6.2
17.5- Feuerstein 0.4.4.2
17.0- Buzz 0.07
14.0- BikJump 2.01
13.0- Gibbon 2.01b
12.0- Rival 1.18
11.0- Surprise 4.3b13
9.5- Warrior 1.0.3
8.5- ECE 0.3
All rounds can be followed and all PGNs downloaded from:
http://kirill-kryukov.com/chess/discuss ... f=7&t=4176
CHAINSAW MASSACRE- Rounds 26 thru 30 (of 44)
Moderator: Ras
-
geots
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
-
geots
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
Re: CHAINSAW MASSACRE- Rounds 26 thru 30 (of 44)
To date- Waxman has been a surprise to me. If i am not mistaken, when i started this RR, it did not even have enough games to give it a rating in CCRL. Tho i could be wrong. At any rate, before using it i was not like Dann- I had never heard of it. I mean, it's not Rybka or Naum, but it plays some fairly good chess. I'm impressed.
Best,
Best,