Conditions:
TC = 4'+2"
Hash = 128 MB
Book = Shredder12.ctg
GUI = Fritz 11
HIARCS 14 WCSC was linked to Nalimov TBs.
A nice progress !
SilvianR



Moderator: Ras
Hello Maestro Jon !jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.
However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.
--Jon
There are only 10 and 32 games played by the two versions your are comparing, so there is very little you can say about their relative strengths using the CCRL results.Sylwy wrote:Hello Maestro Jon !jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.
However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.
--Jon
CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html
Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points
Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points
-94 ELO points
Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !
Regards,
SilvianR
Hello Mod !Adam Hair wrote:There are only 10 and 32 games played by the two versions your are comparing, so there is very little you can say about their relative strengths using the CCRL results.Sylwy wrote:Hello Maestro Jon !jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.
However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.
--Jon
CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html
Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points
Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points
-94 ELO points
Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !
Regards,
SilvianR
Just dropped by to say this:Sylwy wrote:Hello Mod !Adam Hair wrote:There are only 10 and 32 games played by the two versions your are comparing, so there is very little you can say about their relative strengths using the CCRL results.Sylwy wrote:Hello Maestro Jon !jdart wrote:My own tests (38,000 games, hyper-bullet time control) show 16.0 stronger than 15.6, and 16.1 stronger than 16.0.
However, the difference is small, especially on 1 cpu. It is probably larger with multiple cores in use, because 16.0 has optimizations for this.
--Jon
CCRL (4/40) is on way to confirm my tests !
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/40 ... t_all.html
Arasan 15.6 x64..........................2813 ELO points
Arasan 16.1 x64..........................2719 ELO points
-94 ELO points
Testing at hyper-bullet time control is not a good idea. Just my opinion !
Regards,
SilvianR
I already specified : "..........is on way............" .
Just waiting for the final result !![]()
Have a nice weekend !
SilvianR
Thank you, my FRIEND !Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:
Just dropped by to say this:
I like you and like your style Silvian....
Give the computer chess scene hell as much as you can regards,
Dr.D