David Safranek just sent me this link, not to mention that I'm really honored, proud and excited!
Of course a single blitz game means absolutely nothing, but try 1.b3 against a GM yourself. David Navara is #1 player in my country.
The motivation was probably just curiosity I guess?
I don't know what setup was used, but pretty sure Cheng used at least 4 cores, likely more. The opening lines are still the old ones provided by Graham https://lichess.org/nOZtEbAy
EDIT: just got a confirmation that Cheng used 4 cores
mar wrote: ↑Tue Oct 12, 2021 9:39 pm
David Safranek just sent me this link, not to mention that I'm really honored, proud and excited!
Of course a single blitz game means absolutely nothing, but try 1.b3 against a GM yourself. David Navara is #1 player in my country.
The motivation was probably just curiosity I guess?
I don't know what setup was used, but pretty sure Cheng used at least 4 cores, likely more. The opening lines are still the old ones provided by Graham https://lichess.org/nOZtEbAy
EDIT: just got a confirmation that Cheng used 4 cores
The time control is specified as 20m + 10s. Nice game!
mar wrote: ↑Tue Oct 12, 2021 9:39 pm
David Safranek just sent me this link, not to mention that I'm really honored, proud and excited!
Of course a single blitz game means absolutely nothing, but try 1.b3 against a GM yourself. David Navara is #1 player in my country.
The motivation was probably just curiosity I guess?
I don't know what setup was used, but pretty sure Cheng used at least 4 cores, likely more. The opening lines are still the old ones provided by Graham https://lichess.org/nOZtEbAy
EDIT: just got a confirmation that Cheng used 4 cores
The time control is specified as 20m + 10s. Nice game!
What version of Cheng 4 was it? Latest version over 3000 ccrl on 4t, about 3200 fide in rapid vs humans.
lkaufman wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 2:33 am
What version of Cheng 4 was it? Latest version over 3000 ccrl on 4t, about 3200 fide in rapid vs humans.
4.41, about 3100 CCRL (4CPU). of course a single casual game means nothing.
of course Cheng's 2077 lichess rating is deceiving, because every "genius" is running a stockfish bot
mar wrote: ↑Tue Oct 12, 2021 9:39 pm
David Safranek just sent me this link, not to mention that I'm really honored, proud and excited!
Of course a single blitz game means absolutely nothing, but try 1.b3 against a GM yourself. David Navara is #1 player in my country.
The motivation was probably just curiosity I guess?
I don't know what setup was used, but pretty sure Cheng used at least 4 cores, likely more. The opening lines are still the old ones provided by Graham https://lichess.org/nOZtEbAy
EDIT: just got a confirmation that Cheng used 4 cores
lkaufman wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 2:33 am
What version of Cheng 4 was it? Latest version over 3000 ccrl on 4t, about 3200 fide in rapid vs humans.
4.41, about 3100 CCRL (4CPU). of course a single casual game means nothing.
of course Cheng's 2077 lichess rating is deceiving, because every "genius" is running a stockfish bot
So Cheng is 3106 CCRL Rapid, which is about 3306 FIDE Rapid, while Navara is 2706 FIDE Rapid. Expected score: 97%.
