Tony Thomas wrote:I would like to report the first problem. Chenard always loses on time in 1m+1sec time cotnrol.
That's too fast for it I'm afraid - 3 mins minimum should be safe. I couldn't do much with the time management, C++ is difficult for me - all
classes and stuff. Maybe Dann can have a look at it (c++ sources included).
Jim.
Actually, minimum 4 mins would be safest. It's would be easy though for me to build a custom version designed
to run at a specific fixed time control. So if want one which runs ok in 1m+1sec (but only this) let me know and I'll compile one for you.
Tony Thomas wrote:I would like to report the first problem. Chenard always loses on time in 1m+1sec time cotnrol.
That's too fast for it I'm afraid - 3 mins minimum should be safe. I couldn't do much with the time management, C++ is difficult for me - all
classes and stuff. Maybe Dann can have a look at it (c++ sources included).
Jim.
Actually, minimum 4 mins would be safest. It's would be easy though for me to build a custom version designed
to run at a specific fixed time control. So if want one which runs ok in 1m+1sec (but only this) let me know and I'll compile one for you.
Hi Jim,
yes, speaking for Tony as well, we want a special version to suit this time control I hope its not much of a work.
Tony Thomas wrote:I would like to report the first problem. Chenard always loses on time in 1m+1sec time cotnrol.
That's too fast for it I'm afraid - 3 mins minimum should be safe. I couldn't do much with the time management, C++ is difficult for me - all
classes and stuff. Maybe Dann can have a look at it (c++ sources included).
Jim.
Actually, minimum 4 mins would be safest. It's would be easy though for me to build a custom version designed
to run at a specific fixed time control. So if want one which runs ok in 1m+1sec (but only this) let me know and I'll compile one for you.
I hope its not much of a work.