Q6600 (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB)
Q6600 (6MB L2, 2.66GHz, 1333FSB)
Both are Quads. Obviously the higher GHz is preferred but can anyone provide me with a layman's explanation as to how L2 cache and FSB come into play?
Recently I bought a Quad and expected it to whip my dual but the Core 2 Duo more than held its own even though the GHz was the same. I can't figure out if I screwed up in purchasing my quad or its just randomness or there is more to a strong chess computer than GHz. Here are the specs for my machines:
Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 2 GB memory 64 bit OS
Core 2 Duo @ 2.40GHz 2 GB memory 32 bit OS
Why isn't my Quad cleaning the Dual's clock? Both are the same speed and have the same memory and to top it off the Quad has the 64 bit OS? I'm confused.
Paul
Which of these processors is better for chess?
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:46 am
- Location: Saratoga Springs New York
-
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 4:19 pm
Re: Which of these processors is better for chess?
Q6600 (8MB L2 cache,2.4GHz,1066FSB)
Q6600 (6MB L2, 2.66GHz, 1333FSB)
Both are Quads. Obviously the higher GHz is preferred but can anyone provide me with a layman's explanation as to how L2 cache and FSB come into play? I doubt if there is very much difference in kns between the two processors. Should not be enough to make a difference in match play.
Recently I bought a Quad and expected it to whip my dual
What does this mean? What program? what was the depth difference in match play?
but the Core 2 Duo more than held its own even though the GHz was the same. I can't figure out if I screwed up in purchasing my quad or its just randomness or there is more to a strong chess computer than GHz. Here are the specs for my machines:
Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 2 GB memory 64 bit OS
2 gig memory will leave small hash for quad in match play.
Core 2 Duo @ 2.40GHz 2 GB memory 32 bit OS
Why isn't my Quad cleaning the Dual's clock? Both are the same speed and have the same memory and to top it off the Quad has the 64 bit OS? I'm confused.
Paul
here is my quad results. big difference in time to solve and double kns.
One of the differences is I have 4 gig ram with 1024 hash in this test using XP Pro 64. Check your task manager to verify 4 threads running
What programs do you have? what is your kns in this position?
[d] 3r2k1/1pq4p/4p1p1/p1n1p3/P1P1B2P/1P3RP1/2Q4K/8 b - - 0 1
4 threads @ 2.4 gig
Deep Hiarcs 12
4 threads
1620 kns
1...Rd4
-/+ (-0.73) Depth: 17/41 00:00:35 58112kN
1...Rd4
-/+ (-0.95) Depth: 17/42 00:00:39 63831kN
Deep Hiarcs 12
2 threads
850 kns
1...Rd4
=/+ (-0.70) Depth: 18/42 00:02:24 121mN
1...Rd4
-/+ (-0.84) Depth: 18/44 00:02:45 140mN
1...Rd4 2.Bxg6 e4 3.Bf7+ Kg7 4.Rf4 Nd3 5.Qd1 Nxf4 6.Qxd4+ Kxf7 7.Qh8 Kg6 8.Qg8+ Qg7
-+ (-1.78) Depth: 18/55 00:05:26 289mN
[/quote]
Q6600 (6MB L2, 2.66GHz, 1333FSB)
Both are Quads. Obviously the higher GHz is preferred but can anyone provide me with a layman's explanation as to how L2 cache and FSB come into play? I doubt if there is very much difference in kns between the two processors. Should not be enough to make a difference in match play.
Recently I bought a Quad and expected it to whip my dual
What does this mean? What program? what was the depth difference in match play?
but the Core 2 Duo more than held its own even though the GHz was the same. I can't figure out if I screwed up in purchasing my quad or its just randomness or there is more to a strong chess computer than GHz. Here are the specs for my machines:
Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 2 GB memory 64 bit OS
2 gig memory will leave small hash for quad in match play.
Core 2 Duo @ 2.40GHz 2 GB memory 32 bit OS
Why isn't my Quad cleaning the Dual's clock? Both are the same speed and have the same memory and to top it off the Quad has the 64 bit OS? I'm confused.
Paul
here is my quad results. big difference in time to solve and double kns.
One of the differences is I have 4 gig ram with 1024 hash in this test using XP Pro 64. Check your task manager to verify 4 threads running
What programs do you have? what is your kns in this position?
[d] 3r2k1/1pq4p/4p1p1/p1n1p3/P1P1B2P/1P3RP1/2Q4K/8 b - - 0 1
4 threads @ 2.4 gig
Deep Hiarcs 12
4 threads
1620 kns
1...Rd4
-/+ (-0.73) Depth: 17/41 00:00:35 58112kN
1...Rd4
-/+ (-0.95) Depth: 17/42 00:00:39 63831kN
Deep Hiarcs 12
2 threads
850 kns
1...Rd4
=/+ (-0.70) Depth: 18/42 00:02:24 121mN
1...Rd4
-/+ (-0.84) Depth: 18/44 00:02:45 140mN
1...Rd4 2.Bxg6 e4 3.Bf7+ Kg7 4.Rf4 Nd3 5.Qd1 Nxf4 6.Qxd4+ Kxf7 7.Qh8 Kg6 8.Qg8+ Qg7
-+ (-1.78) Depth: 18/55 00:05:26 289mN
[/quote]