CCRL rating lists updated (14th August 2010)

[Graham Banks]

The latest CCRL Rating Lists and Statistics are available for viewing from the following links:
http://computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/4040.live/ (40/40)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404.live/ (40/4)
http://www.computerchess.org.uk/ccrl/404FRC/ (FRC 40/4)

Please note that the three lists are updated separately to each other.
The links given in each update report will give you the currently up to date lists.

The links to the various rating lists can be found just beneath the default Best Versions list (as in this screenshot). Specific 32-bit rating lists are denoted as such to the right of the default list in each category. The default lists contain the 64-bit engines.



Our 40 moves in 40 minutes repeating and 40 moves in 4 minutes repeating are both adjusted to the AMD64 X2 4600+ (2.4GHz).

Currently active testers are Graham Banks, Ray Banks, Shaun Brewer, Adam Hair, Aser Huerga, Kirill Kryukov, Dom Leste, Denis Mendoza, Cody Rowland, Wassim Saeed, Joshua Shriver, Charles Smith, Gabor Szots and Martin Thoresen.

Be aware that in the early stages of testing, an engine's rating can often fluctuate a lot.
It is strongly advised to look at the many other rating lists available in order to get a more accurate overall picture of an engine's rating relative to others.

The LOS (likelihood of superiority) stats to the right hand side of each rating list tell you the likelihood in percentage terms of each engine being superior to the engine directly below them.

All games are available for download by engine, by month or by ECO code.
The current ELO ratings are saved in all game databases for those engines that have 200 games or more.

Clicking on an engine name will give details as to opponents played plus homepage links where applicable.

Custom lists of engines can be selected for comparison.

An openings report page lists the number of games played by ECO codes with draw percentage and White win percentage. Clicking on a column heading will sort the list by that column.

For any testers interested in joining our group, please read our homepage before applying.

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

Thanks for the update Graham
Just one notice,I see that Deep Fritz 11 is 3095 and Critter 3075 in the 40/40 rating list....in my private rating list the gap is almost 400 Elo,that's for the x64 4CPU....my point is that Critter is way too stronger than Deep Fritz 11,perhaps too few games
Dr.D

[Graham Banks]

Thanks for the update Graham
Just one notice,I see that Deep Fritz 11 is 3095 and Critter 3075 in the 40/40 rating list....in my private rating list the gap is almost 400 Elo,that's for the x64 4CPU....my point is that Critter is way too stronger than Deep Fritz 11,perhaps too few games
Dr.D

Hi Wael,

both need more games, but I can't see the difference changing too much considering that they both already have more than 200 games under their belt.
What's the scaling performance like for Critter?

Cheers,
Graham.

[Dr.Wael Deeb]

Thanks for the update Graham
Just one notice,I see that Deep Fritz 11 is 3095 and Critter 3075 in the 40/40 rating list....in my private rating list the gap is almost 400 Elo,that's for the x64 4CPU....my point is that Critter is way too stronger than Deep Fritz 11,perhaps too few games
Dr.D

Hi Wael,

both need more games, but I can't see the difference changing too much considering that they both already have more than 200 games under their belt.
What's the scaling performance like for Critter?

Cheers,
Graham.

Well,Critter is playing a bit stronger than Rybka 3.0 MP x64 and that's after more than 300 games played versus various opponents both running on a quad....and yet again in my rating list the gap between Critter 0.80 x64 4CPU and Deep Fritz 11 4CPU is +400 Elo....

It must be the lack of enough games as you stated....
Dr.D