Test no.1 (DiscoCheck w32 comparative)

[Sylwy]

Hello CCC folks !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Tao 5.6 was linked to Nalimov TBs.
====================
For Mr.Dvorkin (and Donna - all versions ) : Moldova in winter with a friend of mine ! Love Lithuania !



====================

[Sylwy]

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Rybka 4.1 was linked to Nalimov TBs.

Sting SF 6 = an amazing chess engine !





Like bonuses:

1).- Something you have never seen before: my Moldavians in Ukraine:
=====================

=====================

2.)-The old IASI in winter:

[Sylwy]

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Book = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+

Contempt = 0 (Komodo 9.3) in all three matches.

Both engines were linked to Syzygy Bases.








Being Sunday a very nice video with a dear friend of mine - from Suceava/Romania:

===================

===================

[Sylwy]

Hello !

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = 128 MB
-Books = Shredder12.ctg
-GUI = Fritz 11
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

Shredder 12 UCI used Nalimov TBS & Shredderbases (loaded into the RAM memory).






Don't be sad Daniel ! Like compensation I'll post here a photo like you have never seen: my Moldavians in traditional clothes. Do you like it ?

[cdani]

Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.

[cdani]

Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.

The same happened here:

http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809

They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.

[Sylwy]

Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.

The same happened here:

http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809

They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.

Well Daniel, my tests were always at TC = 4'+2" (around 12 minutes/game). I'll run a test at a long TC !

[cdani]

Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.

The same happened here:

http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809

They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.

Well Daniel, my tests were always at TC = 4'+2" (around 12 minutes/game). I'll run a test at a long TC !

It is not necessary! Was just a note But what you want, of course!! Anyway you will have difficulties to obtain anything significative, because I'm talking of very long time control, so better don't even try

[Sylwy]

Hi!
Thanks for the test. In this case even if does not seem it, this is a good result, as this new version of Andscacs seems clearly stronger at longer time control than the previous version 0.84, my objective.

The same happened here:

http://immortalchess.net/forum/showthread.php?p=648809

They have run some thousand games at 60+0.2 sec and the result was more or less the same for 0.85 and 0.84.

Well Daniel, my tests were always at TC = 4'+2" (around 12 minutes/game). I'll run a test at a long TC !

It is not necessary! Was just a note But what you want, of course!! Anyway you will have difficulties to obtain anything significative, because I'm talking of very long time control, so better don't even try

OK !

[Sylwy]

Conditions:

-TC = 4'+2"
-Hash = both engines have fixed hash
-Books = Perfect_2010.abk (Toledo) and its own book (CeruleanJS)
-GUI = Arena 3.0
-CPU = Athlon 64 3800+
-OS = Windows XP SP3

+70 Elo points CCRL 4/40 for CeruleanJS w32 ! I can't see any strength difference between the 32-bit & 64-bit versions of this nice Javascript chess engine !