FGRL rating list - 60 sec + 0.6 sec
Berserk 4.5.1 (+29 to Berserk 4.4.0)
Seer 2.2.0 (+83 to Seer 2.1.0)
Minic 3.09 (-36 to Minic 3.03 NaNi)
Zahak 5.0 (New: 2503)
http://www.fastgm.de
FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Moderator: Ras
-
fastgm
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:57 pm
-
amanjpro
- Posts: 883
- Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2021 1:47 am
- Full name: Amanj Sherwany
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Oh, many thanks for testing Zahak, this was the news of the day
-
xr_a_y
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
- Location: France
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Thanks for testing. But what a strange result for Minic ! Were both version tested on the same hardware ? Are you sure about the settings ? The results look like you tested HCE instead of embedded net.fastgm wrote: ↑Fri Aug 20, 2021 7:41 am FGRL rating list - 60 sec + 0.6 sec
Berserk 4.5.1 (+29 to Berserk 4.4.0)
Seer 2.2.0 (+83 to Seer 2.1.0)
Minic 3.09 (-36 to Minic 3.03 NaNi)
Zahak 5.0 (New: 2503)
http://www.fastgm.de
-
xr_a_y
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
- Location: France
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Oh I just realized your hardware is AVX and not AVX2, that may be the clue.
-
fastgm
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:57 pm
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
I tested this version with the embedded net "nidicolous nighthawk".
https://github.com/tryingsomestuff/Mini ... ehalem.exe
info string This is Minic version 3.09 (NNUE available)
info string Info 2021-08-20 08:57:24-802: Loading NNUE net embedded
uci
id name Minic 3.09
id author Vivien Clauzon
Did I do something wrong?
-
fastgm
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:57 pm
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Yes, hardware is AVX.
Does AVX2 make such a big difference?
Does AVX2 make such a big difference?
-
xr_a_y
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
- Location: France
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Ok the nehalem build is only SSE4.2, with your xeon E5-2670 you probably can use the sandybridge one.
-
xr_a_y
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
- Location: France
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Yes big difference ! between the SSE4.2, the AVX and the AVX2 built for NNUE engine.
-
fastgm
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 6:57 pm
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Well, next I'll test this version:
minic_3.12_mingw_x64_sandybridge.exe
Then at least we see this difference.
-
xr_a_y
- Posts: 1872
- Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 2:28 pm
- Location: France
Re: FGRL, 60 sec + 0.6 sec - 16. Berserk 4.5.1, 25. Seer 2.2.0, 49. Minic 3.09, 80. Zahak 5.0
Well you will see a difference between SSE4.2 and AVX but at very short TC (5s+0.1) AVX2 makes a huge difference (only hand optimized code in Minic)
Code: Select all
Rank Name Elo +/- Games Score Draw
1 minic_3.12_linux_x64_skylake 278 13 2677 83.2% 25.4%
2 minic_3.12_linux_x64_sandybridge -68 11 2677 40.4% 33.9%
3 minic_3.12_linux_x64_nehalem -81 11 2676 38.6% 34.0%
4 minic_3.12_linux_x64_core2 -86 11 2676 37.9% 32.7%