Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 10:48 pmBut it will NOT be solved in your lifetime like Checker was, there are too many possible moves and combination that will require at least computer 50 times faster than Chinook, and endgame of at least 12 Pieces EGTB.towforce wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:59 pmNot possible: chess is a finite game.Chessqueen wrote: ↑Wed Aug 03, 2022 12:20 pmThe Elo is Just a Number created by us to differentiate the strength of the Engines, but the Elo scale could have infinity number.................................................................................................................................................?![]()
Chess won't be solved in the way that checkers was. However, there are other possibilities:
* stacking proofs on top of each other to prove the win of material is not possible from the opening position (and hence that chess is a draw, because the king is a subset of "material"). Software to prove things is steadily improving, or a chess specific set of proofs could be built
* discover key relationships between pieces that humans haven't found yet which always hold, and which enable any position to be evaluated accurately (NNs have already found valuable relationships which writers of hand-coded evaluation functions don't know - but I think we'll need a different technology to find the best relationships)
* even if chess isn't fully resolved, chess engines will be able to reach a level where they get beaten so rarely that no other engine can get 1 elo point higher (this is very likely to happen before chess gets formally resolved). At this point, we will be at the upper limit of the elo scale.