Chess Engine Leptir

[Eduard]

I would like to point out that I am not jealous of AlexChess. My two accounts also achieved 3000 Elo (2 accounts, only one game losed):





Unlike ProteusSF, I always play in autoplayer mode and against all opponents. And when I play against my friends like you can see here against "Detlef Uter" or "Big_Pat", we don't cheat! We also fight against each other without compromise. It would be very easy for me to rig some games. But I don't do that. I'm currently not enjoying the server game anymore. Thank you AlexChess!

[AlexChess]

I don't understand why you are always talking about my engines on your topic. Instead, you could explain which code snippets you have added to Stockfish code (if any) that makes your daily modded engines so special. But until I'm involved, I must clarify

Obviously, testing my engines between them is to improve the one that has settings changed. For example bruteforce is a true debacle, while MCTS has minimal influence. but they play together only when there is a reason for doing that and they play normal games without tricks, until the end. Tonight, with optimal settings, Fourcores ProteusSF-Sunrise has reached 3002 and B01 ProteusSF-Piranha 2995, never playing between them.

PS: Where is the mystery???
We use all our accounts to play even with mythic Rebel 16.2 (Ed and Chris that you kindly call granfathers making engines for grandfathers ) Ethereal 14 github, Berserk 11.1 and Koivisto 9.2 that have reached Stockfish level.

Aren't you a bit jelous also of Anton101, since his DarkSisTer 4.7 seems very strong, too and you could now focus on him?

[Eduard]

You understand nothing. First: I include the source code when I release my engine. Anyone can see and study the source code.

Why should I be jealous of Dark Sister? Unfortunately, this engine occupies one of the last places in my test. Nevertheless, I wish Anton every success and I'm happy for him when he creates something good. After all, nobody cheats with Dark Sister on the server, unlike your 2 main accounts. Unfortunately, the other day there was a download link for Dark Sister in the Open Chess Forum without source code. That's less good.

But I won't discuss it further with you now because you're not willing to change your cheat way on the server. Nobody has disappointed me more than you, Alex. Ask yourself why is that.

[AlexChess]

You understand nothing. First: I include the source code when I release my engine. Anyone can see and study the source code.

Why should I be jealous of Dark Sister? Unfortunately, this engine occupies one of the last places in my test. Nevertheless, I wish Anton every success and I'm happy for him when he creates something good. After all, nobody cheats with Dark Sister on the server, unlike your 2 main accounts. Unfortunately, the other day there was a download link for Dark Sister in the Open Chess Forum without source code. That's less good.

But I won't discuss it further with you now because you're not willing to change your cheat way on the server. Nobody has disappointed me more than you, Alex. Ask yourself why is that.

I was talking about real code changes, not random changes of values. I'm a certified developer unlike you and I have seen your code.
After being kicked off from all chess forums worldwide and now insulting here even the fathers of all chess engines, this time I really hope that you will mantain ONE promise ("I will never release an engine anymore, I don't want to be a moderator anymore, please Pham delete my account" and so on...) to not insult me anymore. I will instantly stop writing here, in this case.

[Eduard]

Are you a developer? Then you insult all real developers. Anyone who cheats with their MAIN accounts and artificially increases their Elo rating is not a real developer. Real developers don't need such ways to push their own software like you do. That's what I'm so disappointed about. I thought you were an honest guy. Unfortunately you are not.

[AlexChess]

New promise not mantained (as expected) . So I will continue to reply to you until you will be kicked off even from Talkchess (maybe after Ed request)

https://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic. ... ER#p943723

...the ox says cuckolded to the donkey:

1.You have at least 2 owned accounts: Solista and Solistachess.
2.You play with your friends and A2-a3 plays often against weaker engines to increase his score. I'm not interested on peaking your other accounts.
3.You are hated by most chessfans worldwide and they not only ignore you, they ban you from their forums,to be sure to not meet you again

[CornfedForever]

I like to see people happy. Having different opinions is one thing...personal attacks another....too much of that on this - and frankly most any - site, but that is 2023 for you. Forums can bring out the worst in people.

I wonder if Alex could 'test his engines' in non-rated games - perhaps only using rated games for play against engines that are not his own?

Perhaps...that is too much to ask for some reason?

[Eduard]

New promise not mantained (as expected) . So I will continue to reply to you until you will be kicked off even from Talkchess (maybe after Ed request)

https://talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic. ... ER#p943723

...the ox says cuckolded to the donkey:

1.You have at least 2 owned accounts: Solista and Solistachess.
2.You play with your friends and A2-a3 plays often against weaker engines to increase his score. I'm not interested on peaking your other accounts.
3.You are hated by most chessfans worldwide and they not only ignore you, they ban you from their forums,to be sure to not meet you again

Neither I nor my friends cheat. It is an insolence to claim that. The only one cheating is you.

Everyone on PlayChess knows that. Everyone on PlayChess knows that my friends don't cheat.

MZ plays with hypnos and doesn't cheat.
Hurnavich (testing MZ engines) doesn't cheat. He's not my friend but he can attest that I'm not cheating. And I can attest that he doesn't cheat.

I also tested with Hypnos for months and never cheated.

Andrea Manzo is also a regular feature on Playchess. His testers don't cheat, Shashchess doesn't cheat.

Eman users don't cheat at all either.

The programmer of Raubfisch also plays on PlayChess himself, and he doesn't cheat either.

Dark Sister doesn't cheat.

Nobody cheats but you. You are the only one doing this.

And now you even try to twist things. I can't believe what kind of person you are.

[Peter Berger]

No clear idea about current server world per se.
But I was running a computerchess account myself way back in time, and I am near 100% sure that my feedback will be to the point.
I was running the account for Gerrit Reubold, the developper of Bringer on the then hot server, so I was running an account that everybody in the computerchess world was OK to play against in principle. There was no always online service in Germany back then, so I had to log on and somehow manage it.
Bringer was kind of competive these days, and always low-rated – so there was not much of an incentive to play against it.
I am a maths guy, so I always enjoyed reading the „formulas“ of the engines on the then server. NO patch in the world has ever managed to improve +any+ engine more than the formulas on the server. I knew back then that this was not directed against me, and it sure wasn’t, but it was also funny, as it certainly influenced the opinion of the people on what engine was doing well right now.
This was ICC and the amateur world, and a time where you had to wonder at what exact time limit you may be able to challenge mighty „Ferret“, ( and this was difficult).
What you are doing now is clearly way worse. You are applying little patches and then you do the formulas with their huge influence and your „testing“, and then you make your judgments.
You are clearly wasting time and electricity .

[Eduard]

I like to see people happy. Having different opinions is one thing...personal attacks another....too much of that on this - and frankly most any - site, but that is 2023 for you. Forums can bring out the worst in people.

I wonder if Alex could 'test his engines' in non-rated games - perhaps only using rated games for play against engines that are not his own?

Perhaps...that is too much to ask for some reason?

You're right. I won't write about it anymore.

I have collected enough material and will contact ChessBase directly. That seems to be the only way. I don't see that I pay 70 euros a year to be scammed.