I think you are getting close there Steve. And at one time I think at least one of them was in your neighbourhood too. Well disguised it's tru but maybe this is a clue:
Men in Black Regards,
Eelco X3D
ok let me guess
Kasparov
Frans Morch
Frederic Friedel and
Wolverine Regards
Steve
From left to right, Frans Morsch, Mathias Feist, unknown to me, Alex Kure. By the way, the latter may very well sign as Alex K.
Enir wrote:
From left to right, Frans Morsch, Mathias Feist, unknown to me, Alex Kure. By the way, the latter may very well sign as Alex K.
Enrique
aha!
thanks Enrique
now we are getting somewhere at last
Whats My Line Regards
Steve
Tremble, shiver, Steve Blincoe! Alex may have killer lines for all of you.
Enrique
OK good Dr.
now that we have nailed down the true identity of our first mystery guest(member)....
i will hazard a guess as to the identity of the other one..
IMO this rybka-discussion has ONE very cool side effect, and i would like to thank Vas for inspirating the discussion....
we have steve b back here, chris w., christophe, ed, bob....
amazing.
it seems they all came back to discuss.
ok. i would like to see a different topic. something about new ideas and
how to use them with lots of PGNs with examples. instead anybody discusses the copyright issue.
but nevertheless. they are all back.
And thats cool.
thank you rybka. for all you gave us. inspiration.
I really don't understand why all this arguing back and forth. So somebody has some questions about a program... Big deal. I don't think Mr. Hyatt would lie. Let him do his homework and if he finds something- Great. If he finds that nothing was done wrong - even better. Is there something wrong with someone researching something he has a question about??
rjand wrote:I really don't understand why all this arguing back and forth. So somebody has some questions about a program... Big deal. I don't think Mr. Hyatt would lie. Let him do his homework and if he finds something- Great. If he finds that nothing was done wrong - even better. Is there something wrong with someone researching something he has a question about??
Rick Andrews
Nice try. Homework yes. Where and how? Would you think that Bob should lament here in public or should he better compare the programs in doubts? But in truth he laments and talks and attacks and insults, because the ethical rule is violated which says: innocent until PROVEN guilty. Proven, not prejudiced. Ask if you miss something.
-Popper and Lakatos are good but I'm stuck on Leibowitz
so now i am wondering if your post is a clone of mine
i will be subjecting your post to reverse decompilation procedures and then i will post all of the findings here
rjand wrote:I really don't understand why all this arguing back and forth. So somebody has some questions about a program... Big deal. I don't think Mr. Hyatt would lie. Let him do his homework and if he finds something- Great. If he finds that nothing was done wrong - even better. Is there something wrong with someone researching something he has a question about??
Rick Andrews
Nice try. Homework yes. Where and how? Would you think that Bob should lament here in public or should he better compare the programs in doubts? But in truth he laments and talks and attacks and insults, because the ethical rule is violated which says: innocent until PROVEN guilty. Proven, not prejudiced. Ask if you miss something.
Hi Rolf,
Maybe I did miss something. Did he say that Rybka definitley did something wrong or that he suspected it.