Remember this one from the Louget test suite?
[d] 8/5Bp1/4P3/6pP/1b1k1P2/5K2/8/8 w - - bm Kg4;
Is this old test position still difficult?
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:30 pm
Re: Is this old test position still difficult?
Rybka 3 finds it quickly (Core 2 Duo @3GHz, 512MB hash), but doesn't say how... (that bug should be corrected in an upcoming Rybka 3+ update)
1.fxg5 Ke5[] 2.h6 gxh6[] 3.gxh6 Kd6 4.h7 Bc3[] 5.Kg4 Ke7 6.Kf5 Bf6 7.Bh5 Bh8 8.Bf3 Bf6 9.Be4 Bd4 10.Bh1 Bg7 11.Bd5 Bd4 12.Bc6 Bh8
+- (1.43) Depth: 26 00:00:24 1857kN, tb=3967
1.Kg4
+- (1.63 !) Depth: 26 00:01:07 4530kN, tb=14579
1.Kg4
+- (1.83 !) Depth: 26 00:01:42 6901kN, tb=24367
1.Kg4
+- (2.23 !) Depth: 26 00:02:22 8744kN, tb=37931
1.Kg4
+- (3.03 !) Depth: 26 00:03:42 12603kN, tb=66550
1.Kg4
+- (4.63 !) Depth: 26 00:05:22 17898kN, tb=102765
1.fxg5 Ke5[] 2.h6 gxh6[] 3.gxh6 Kd6 4.h7 Bc3[] 5.Kg4 Ke7 6.Kf5 Bf6 7.Bh5 Bh8 8.Bf3 Bf6 9.Be4 Bd4 10.Bh1 Bg7 11.Bd5 Bd4 12.Bc6 Bh8
+- (1.43) Depth: 26 00:00:24 1857kN, tb=3967
1.Kg4
+- (1.63 !) Depth: 26 00:01:07 4530kN, tb=14579
1.Kg4
+- (1.83 !) Depth: 26 00:01:42 6901kN, tb=24367
1.Kg4
+- (2.23 !) Depth: 26 00:02:22 8744kN, tb=37931
1.Kg4
+- (3.03 !) Depth: 26 00:03:42 12603kN, tb=66550
1.Kg4
+- (4.63 !) Depth: 26 00:05:22 17898kN, tb=102765
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Is this old test position still difficult?
looks fairly easy at todays speeds. Current Crafty, 8-core 2.33ghz xeon box:
Code: Select all
26-> 17.00 2.83 1. fxg5 Ke5 2. h6 gxh6 3. gxh6 Kd6
4. h7 Bc3 5. Bg8 Ba1 6. Kg4 Bb2 7.
Kh5 Bh8 8. Kh6 Ke7 9. Kg6 Ba1 10. Kh5
Bh8 11. Kg5 Ba1 12. Kg6 Bh8 13. Bf7
Kf8 (s=5)
27 19.41 2.75 1. fxg5 Ke5 2. h6 gxh6 3. gxh6 Kd6
4. h7 Bc3 5. Bg8 Ba1 6. Kg4 Bb2 7.
Kh5 Bh8 8. Kh6 Ke7 9. Kg6 Ba1 10. Kh5
Bh8 11. Kg5 Ba1 12. Kg6 Bh8 13. Bf7
Kf8 14. Bg8 (s=4)
27 44.97 +1 1. Kg4!
27 1:09 +3 1. Kg4!
27 1:18 +M 1. Kg4!
27 1:43 5.77 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4.
Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+
Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5
11. Bg6 Bf4 12. h7 Bg5 13. h8=Q Bf6+
14. Kg8 Bxh8 15. Kxh8
27-> 1:43 5.77 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4.
Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+
Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5
11. Bg6 Bf4 12. h7 Bg5 13. h8=Q Bf6+
14. Kg8 Bxh8 15. Kxh8
28 1:55 6.10 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4.
Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+
Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5
11. Be6 Bh4 12. h7 Bf6+ 13. Kg8 Ke4
14. h8=Q Bxh8 15. Kxh8 Ke5
28-> 2:04 6.10 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4.
Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+
Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5
11. Be6 Bh4 12. h7 Bf6+ 13. Kg8 Ke4
14. h8=Q Bxh8 15. Kxh8 Ke5
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Is this old test position still difficult?
I left it running without noticing. Here is the current results:bob wrote:looks fairly easy at todays speeds. Current Crafty, 8-core 2.33ghz xeon box:
Code: Select all
26-> 17.00 2.83 1. fxg5 Ke5 2. h6 gxh6 3. gxh6 Kd6 4. h7 Bc3 5. Bg8 Ba1 6. Kg4 Bb2 7. Kh5 Bh8 8. Kh6 Ke7 9. Kg6 Ba1 10. Kh5 Bh8 11. Kg5 Ba1 12. Kg6 Bh8 13. Bf7 Kf8 (s=5) 27 19.41 2.75 1. fxg5 Ke5 2. h6 gxh6 3. gxh6 Kd6 4. h7 Bc3 5. Bg8 Ba1 6. Kg4 Bb2 7. Kh5 Bh8 8. Kh6 Ke7 9. Kg6 Ba1 10. Kh5 Bh8 11. Kg5 Ba1 12. Kg6 Bh8 13. Bf7 Kf8 14. Bg8 (s=4) 27 44.97 +1 1. Kg4! 27 1:09 +3 1. Kg4! 27 1:18 +M 1. Kg4! 27 1:43 5.77 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4. Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+ Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5 11. Bg6 Bf4 12. h7 Bg5 13. h8=Q Bf6+ 14. Kg8 Bxh8 15. Kxh8 27-> 1:43 5.77 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4. Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+ Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5 11. Bg6 Bf4 12. h7 Bg5 13. h8=Q Bf6+ 14. Kg8 Bxh8 15. Kxh8 28 1:55 6.10 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4. Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+ Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5 11. Be6 Bh4 12. h7 Bf6+ 13. Kg8 Ke4 14. h8=Q Bxh8 15. Kxh8 Ke5 28-> 2:04 6.10 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4. Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+ Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Bg3 10. f5 Ke5 11. Be6 Bh4 12. h7 Bf6+ 13. Kg8 Ke4 14. h8=Q Bxh8 15. Kxh8 Ke5
Code: Select all
31-> 14:32 7.87 1. Kg4 Be7 2. Kf5 g4 3. Kxg4 Ke4 4.
Be8 Kd5 5. Kf5 Kd6 6. Kg6 Kxe6 7. Bf7+
Kd6 8. Kxg7 Bh4 9. h6 Be1 10. h7 Bc3+
11. Kg8 Ke7 12. Bg6 Kd6 13. h8=Q Bxh8
14. Kxh8 Kc7 15. Kg7 Kd8 16. f5 Kc7
17. f6
32 15:08 +1 1. Kg4!
32 16:24 +3 1. Kg4!
-
- Posts: 3652
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:15 pm
- Full name: Jouni Uski
Re: Is this old test position still difficult?
Fritz is fast (P2400):
Analysis by Fritz 10:
1.fxg5 Ke5
± (0.92) Depth: 17/25 00:00:03 2728kN, tb=679
1.fxg5 Ke5 2.Kg4 Be7 3.g6 Kf6 4.Be8 Bf8 5.Bd7 Bd6 6.Bc8 Be5 7.Kf3 Bd6 8.Ke4 Ke7 9.Kf5
² (0.68) Depth: 17/27 00:00:04 4745kN, tb=994
1.Kg4
² (0.69) Depth: 17/27 00:00:07 7514kN, tb=1646
1.Kg4
± (0.84) Depth: 17/28 00:00:09 9326kN, tb=2126
1.Kg4
± (1.16) Depth: 17/31 00:00:12 11962kN, tb=2755
1.Kg4 gxf4 2.Kxf4 Bf8 3.Kg5 Ke5 4.Kg6 Kf4 5.Kh7 Kg5 6.Kg8 Bc5
± (1.23) Depth: 18/35 00:00:19 17908kN, tb=4316
1.Kg4
+- (1.51) Depth: 19/38 00:00:38 30437kN, tb=8256
1.Kg4 gxf4 2.Kxf4 Bf8 3.Kg5 Ke5 4.Kg6 Kf4 5.Be8 Kg4 6.Kf7 Bc5 7.Kxg7 Kf5 8.Bf7
+- (1.52) Depth: 20/42 00:01:01 50441kN, tb=15524
Jouni
Analysis by Fritz 10:
1.fxg5 Ke5
± (0.92) Depth: 17/25 00:00:03 2728kN, tb=679
1.fxg5 Ke5 2.Kg4 Be7 3.g6 Kf6 4.Be8 Bf8 5.Bd7 Bd6 6.Bc8 Be5 7.Kf3 Bd6 8.Ke4 Ke7 9.Kf5
² (0.68) Depth: 17/27 00:00:04 4745kN, tb=994
1.Kg4
² (0.69) Depth: 17/27 00:00:07 7514kN, tb=1646
1.Kg4
± (0.84) Depth: 17/28 00:00:09 9326kN, tb=2126
1.Kg4
± (1.16) Depth: 17/31 00:00:12 11962kN, tb=2755
1.Kg4 gxf4 2.Kxf4 Bf8 3.Kg5 Ke5 4.Kg6 Kf4 5.Kh7 Kg5 6.Kg8 Bc5
± (1.23) Depth: 18/35 00:00:19 17908kN, tb=4316
1.Kg4
+- (1.51) Depth: 19/38 00:00:38 30437kN, tb=8256
1.Kg4 gxf4 2.Kxf4 Bf8 3.Kg5 Ke5 4.Kg6 Kf4 5.Be8 Kg4 6.Kf7 Bc5 7.Kxg7 Kf5 8.Bf7
+- (1.52) Depth: 20/42 00:01:01 50441kN, tb=15524
Jouni
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Is this old test position still difficult?
Fritz is lucky. The eval is hardly changing. This is a crush once you see "the truth"...Jouni wrote:Fritz is fast (P2400):
Analysis by Fritz 10:
1.fxg5 Ke5
± (0.92) Depth: 17/25 00:00:03 2728kN, tb=679
1.fxg5 Ke5 2.Kg4 Be7 3.g6 Kf6 4.Be8 Bf8 5.Bd7 Bd6 6.Bc8 Be5 7.Kf3 Bd6 8.Ke4 Ke7 9.Kf5
² (0.68) Depth: 17/27 00:00:04 4745kN, tb=994
1.Kg4
² (0.69) Depth: 17/27 00:00:07 7514kN, tb=1646
1.Kg4
± (0.84) Depth: 17/28 00:00:09 9326kN, tb=2126
1.Kg4
± (1.16) Depth: 17/31 00:00:12 11962kN, tb=2755
1.Kg4 gxf4 2.Kxf4 Bf8 3.Kg5 Ke5 4.Kg6 Kf4 5.Kh7 Kg5 6.Kg8 Bc5
± (1.23) Depth: 18/35 00:00:19 17908kN, tb=4316
1.Kg4
+- (1.51) Depth: 19/38 00:00:38 30437kN, tb=8256
1.Kg4 gxf4 2.Kxf4 Bf8 3.Kg5 Ke5 4.Kg6 Kf4 5.Be8 Kg4 6.Kf7 Bc5 7.Kxg7 Kf5 8.Bf7
+- (1.52) Depth: 20/42 00:01:01 50441kN, tb=15524
Jouni