Stockfish in my ponder on rating list

[IWB]

Hi all,

Stockfish 1.4 included:

1 Thread
256 MB Hash
max 4 Steiner (Tbs, Sbases, BB - 64 MB cache)
Ponder ON
Opening positions, changing colors
Time: 6m + 3s

Code: Select all

    Program                          Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws

  1 Rybka 3                        : 2831   11  11  3200    76.9 %   2622   31.0 %
  2 Rybka 3 1T 32-bit              : 2770   16  16  1300    69.8 %   2624   34.3 %
  3 Rybka 2.3.2a x64 mp            : 2719    6   6  8500    62.9 %   2627   39.2 %
  4 Naum 4 x64                     : 2699    7   7  5600    55.4 %   2662   40.3 %
  5 Rybka 2.2n2 x64 mp             : 2682   10  10  2600    59.2 %   2618   41.4 %
  6 Rybka 1.2f x64                 : 2670    6   6  8000    64.1 %   2570   33.8 %
  7 Deep Fritz 11                  : 2638   14  14  1500    55.9 %   2597   38.6 %
  8 Shredder Bonn                  : 2623   10  10  3000    50.8 %   2618   40.0 %
  9 Zappa Mexico II x64            : 2621    6   6  8300    46.5 %   2646   40.4 %
  10 Stockfish 1.4 JA 64bit        : 2618   15  15  1200    54.0 %   2590   38.4 %
  11 Deep Shredder 11 x64          : 2600    9   9  3600    52.0 %   2587   39.2 %
  12 Strelka 2.0 B x64             : 2599   16  16  1000    52.8 %   2579   43.5 %
  13 Rybka 1.0 Beta x64            : 2597   11  11  2500    53.2 %   2574   36.3 %
  14 Zappa Mexico X64 Final        : 2592    9   9  3600    53.2 %   2570   40.4 %
  15 Naum 3.1 x64                  : 2591    7   7  5600    47.8 %   2606   38.9 %
  16 Onno-1-0-0 x64                : 2585   14  14  1500    45.7 %   2615   40.5 %
  17 DSjeng WC2008 x64             : 2577    8   8  5400    38.4 %   2659   35.4 %
  18 Toga II 1.4 beta5c BB         : 2574    6   6  7800    39.4 %   2649   37.7 %
  19 H12.1 MP                      : 2568    6   6  8900    38.5 %   2650   36.9 %
  20 DSjeng 3.0 x64                : 2565   10  10  3200    41.0 %   2628   33.8 %
  21 Glaurung 2.2 JA x64           : 2549    8   8  5100    34.2 %   2662   33.3 %
  22 Naum 2.2                      : 2544   10  10  2700    43.5 %   2589   42.9 %
  23 Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit         : 2542    8   8  4400    50.1 %   2542   33.2 %
  24 HIARCS 11.2                   : 2536    7   7  6600    45.5 %   2568   36.3 %
  25 Fruit 05/11/03                : 2533    6   6  9900    36.2 %   2632   36.9 %
  26 DS 10 Balmung                 : 2531   10  10  2600    49.9 %   2531   42.5 %
  27 LoopMP 12.32                  : 2525    7   7  5600    44.7 %   2562   34.7 %
  28 Loop 13.5                     : 2524    8   8  4700    43.4 %   2570   37.0 %
  29 Toga II 1.2.1a                : 2520    7   7  6600    46.6 %   2543   35.2 %
  30 ListMP 11.64b                 : 2517   12  12  2200    44.0 %   2559   35.9 %
  31 Glaurung 2.1                  : 2510   19  19   900    42.7 %   2561   33.9 %
  32 Deep Shredder 10 x64          : 2506    5   5 11700    35.5 %   2610   34.1 %
  33 Naum 2.1 NoLearn              : 2505    9   9  3700    44.6 %   2543   36.4 %
  34 Spike 1.2 Turin               : 2481    5   5 13300    32.3 %   2610   33.2 %
  35 DS 9.02                       : 2466   16  16  1400    37.9 %   2552   29.1 %
  36 Deep Sjeng 2.7                : 2455   13  13  2000    31.2 %   2592   33.1 %
  37 Glaurung 2-epsilon/5          : 2446   16  16  1300    34.8 %   2555   30.9 %
  38 Deep Sjeng 2.5                : 2387   20  20   900    29.9 %   2534   30.6 %

Individual results:

Code: Select all

10 Stockfish 1.4 JA 64bit    : 2618  1200 (+417,=461,-322), 54.0 %

Zappa Mexico II x64           : 100 (+ 26,= 41,- 33), 46.5 %
Deep Shredder 10 x64          : 100 (+ 57,= 28,- 15), 71.0 %
Spike 1.2 Turin               : 100 (+ 54,= 34,- 12), 71.0 %
Fruit 05/11/03                : 100 (+ 44,= 43,- 13), 65.5 %
Rybka 2.3.2a mp               : 100 (+ 12,= 37,- 51), 30.5 %
H12.1 MP 1T                   : 100 (+ 34,= 47,- 19), 57.5 %
Toga II 1.4 beta5c BB         : 100 (+ 41,= 35,- 24), 58.5 %
Deep Shredder 11 x64          : 100 (+ 35,= 30,- 35), 50.0 %
Shredder Bonn 1T              : 100 (+ 27,= 34,- 39), 44.0 %
DSjeng WC2008 x64             : 100 (+ 37,= 38,- 25), 56.0 %
Naum 4                        : 100 (+ 14,= 50,- 36), 39.0 %
Onno-1-0-0 x64                : 100 (+ 36,= 44,- 20), 58.0 %

The weak point are the three Shredders in the test enviroment, but they have very precise ratings and I want to use that. Nevertheless I am really astonished by Stockfish! Congratulations to the programmer!

Bye
Ingo

[zamar]

Thank you for sharing the list!

Interesting to see that there are three engines so closely coupled:

8 Shredder Bonn : 2623 10 10 3000 50.8 % 2618 40.0 %
9 Zappa Mexico II x64 : 2621 6 6 8300 46.5 % 2646 40.4 %
10 Stockfish 1.4 JA 64bit : 2618 15 15 1200 54.0 % 2590 38.4 %


For some reason I don't see Thinker anywhere on the list. It should also be around equal strength... Is that intentional choice?

[ernest]

For some reason I don't see Thinker anywhere on the list. It should also be around equal strength... Is that intentional choice?

Yes it is!

[IWB]

Hello

For some reason I don't see Thinker anywhere on the list. It should also be around equal strength... Is that intentional choice?

Sure it is.

Thinker is ...

1. no UCI
2. not giving honest output!

At least to my knowledge.

2nd Point is making it hard to detect clones ... so I refuse to test it and actually i dont understand why other do!

I know, with that reasons I should throw out others as well, but I cant miss the best engines!

Bye
Ingo

[Matthias Gemuh]

For some reason I don't see Thinker anywhere on the list. It should also be around equal strength... Is that intentional choice?

It is very boring to test an engine that hides its thinking.

Matthias.

[zamar]

Okay,

thanks for the explanation