Bright 0.5c : 2753

[Le Fou numerique]

Hi,

Bright 0.5c would get an initial rating of 2753 if he would included in the UEL.

PGN on the page of Matchs et tournois entre Engines.

Regards,
Patrick

[beachknight]

Fights for the top in UEL are creating heat waves

Difficult decision on Bright and Spark...

And I foresee a new division between Elite and Senior.

Best,

[Le Fou numerique]

Fights for the top in UEL are creating heat waves

Difficult decision on Bright and Spark...

And I foresee a new division between Elite and Senior.

Best,

Hi,

For now, I chose Spark.

There will be no new divisions

Perhaps, it is going towards something else than UEL.

Regards,
Patrick

[Carlos777]

For now, I chose Spark.

Hi Patrick,

Won't you keep testing Bright 0.5c?

I don't get why you already decided to keep Spark, in spite of Bright getting better results so far in your tests.

Best,
Carlos

[beachknight]

Fights for the top in UEL are creating heat waves

Difficult decision on Bright and Spark...

And I foresee a new division between Elite and Senior.

Best,

Hi,

For now, I chose Spark.

There will be no new divisions

Perhaps, it is going towards something else than UEL.

Regards,
Patrick

Woooow. Like Champions section or hall or whatever for the
biggest clashes. I really like the idea.

Best,

[Le Fou numerique]

For now, I chose Spark.

Hi Patrick,

Won't you keep testing Bright 0.5c?

I don't get why you already decided to keep Spark, in spite of Bright getting better results so far in your tests.

Best,
Carlos

Hi Carlos,

The rating of Bright 0.5c is only the result of the "tournoi d'entrée", 128 games.

It's not sure that it would keep this rating.

Last month, Spark replace Bright in the UEL. I understood that AJ Siemelink wrote that Spark is a new engine with more potential for developpement than Bright. But with my bad english....

Perhaps AJ will told us wich engine to use.

Regards,
Patrick

[Le Fou numerique]

Woooow. Like Champions section or hall or whatever for the
biggest clashes. I really like the idea.

Best,

Hi,

I don't made a decision.

But if the future of the UCI engines is the accumulation of engines by the revolutionary gully, I have no desire to participate.

Regards,
Patrick

[Le Fou numerique]

Hi Carlos,

If I add 16 games Bright 0.5c played outside from "tournoi d'entrée" the rating decrease to 2744. In this tournament on PIV, Spark 0.3a had better direct results against Bright 0.5c (1.5-0.5).

Code: Select all

Rank Name                        Ruel    +    -  games score oppo. draws 
   1 Stockfish 1.6.2             2892   40   38   378   87%  2552   19% 
   2 Rybka 2.2n2                 2782   14   14  2001   76%  2580   30% 
   3 Doch 1.3.4                  2745   53   50   182   78%  2491   20% 
   4 Bright 0.5c                 2744   64   59   144   80%  2479   15% 
   5 Spark 0.3a                  2681   56   53   148   75%  2473   26% 
   6 Fruit 2.3.1                 2680   11   11  3082   62%  2585   34% 
   7 Spike 1.2 Turin             2650   10    9  4254   60%  2572   35% 
   8 Critter 0.42                2620   19   19   910   54%  2580   38% 
   9 Twisted Logic 20090922      2604   19   19   990   49%  2603   34% 
  10 Delfi 5.4                   2596   13   13  2097   48%  2602   34% 

More games needed but should be more time.

Regards,
Patrick

[Carlos777]

More games needed but should be more time.

Hi Patrick,

Absolutely. In my personal tests, after near 200 games for each against the same opponents, both have almost the same results. Probably Spark is better, but the difference is too short to know with few games. Let's wait for results of the CCRL/CEGT guys.

Best,
Carlos

Edit:

I understood that AJ Siemelink wrote that Spark is a new engine with more potential for developpement than Bright.

I read about this too. In that case, it makes sense to keep Spark on your testing instead of Bright.