Hi,
I am COMPLETELY confused.
Bob, Steve, and Dann have claimed that the reinstatement of the Ippo links was because there was no proof the code had been taken from Rybka 3, and Vas's claims were insufficient. Yet, Bob posted, as if this were the oldest news in the world, that the original Ippo guys CLAIMED to have taken their code from Rybka 3.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 964#322964
Could this be explained please?
Clarification requested
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 3026
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Clarification requested
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."
-
- Posts: 6662
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 4:21 am
Re: Clarification requested
Where is the source that original Ippolito creators claimed to have disassembled Rybka 3??
Show me link, source etc. I have seen/heard nowhere about such claims. I thought they don't speak english at all, and instead communicate in their own native language as evident from whatever they've posted so far.
Show me link, source etc. I have seen/heard nowhere about such claims. I thought they don't speak english at all, and instead communicate in their own native language as evident from whatever they've posted so far.
-
- Posts: 44587
- Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
- Location: Auckland, NZ
Re: Clarification requested
You've obviously got a lot of catching up to do.swami wrote:Where is the source that original Ippolito creators claimed to have disassembled Rybka 3??
Show me link, source etc. I have seen/heard nowhere about such claims. I thought they don't speak english at all, and instead communicate in their own native language as evident from whatever they've posted so far.

gbanksnz at gmail.com
-
- Posts: 3196
- Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 3:00 am
- Location: WY, USA
- Full name: Michael Sherwin
Re: Clarification requested
I think that everyone on all sides of the issue have had some confusion and Bob is probably no exception. Just letting it be is the best policy right now. No need to start new battles.
If you are on a sidewalk and the covid goes beep beep
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through
Just step aside or you might have a bit of heat
Covid covid runs through the town all day
Can the people ever change their ways
Sherwin the covid's after you
Sherwin if it catches you you're through
-
- Posts: 3026
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Re: Clarification requested
Refresh your browser if the link in my post is not appearing.swami wrote:Where is the source that original Ippolito creators claimed to have disassembled Rybka 3??
"Tactics are the bricks and sticks that make up a game, but positional play is the architectural blueprint."
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Clarification requested
Yes. One can claim anything. Vas claimed the code was copied. The mystery authors supposedly told Vas they decompiled Robo*. It all came from Vas. This is not news. My original "thought" was mistakenly about Strelka, which did claim to be reverse-engineered from Rybka 1 beta.Albert Silver wrote:Hi,
I am COMPLETELY confused.
Bob, Steve, and Dann have claimed that the reinstatement of the Ippo links was because there was no proof the code had been taken from Rybka 3, and Vas's claims were insufficient. Yet, Bob posted, as if this were the oldest news in the world, that the original Ippo guys CLAIMED to have taken their code from Rybka 3.
http://www.talkchess.com/forum/viewtopi ... 964#322964
Could this be explained please?
So, nothing of any substance so far.
-
- Posts: 20943
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:30 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
Re: Clarification requested
I probably mixed up the claim from Vas about getting emails, with the original strelka decompilation which was acknowledged.Michael Sherwin wrote:I think that everyone on all sides of the issue have had some confusion and Bob is probably no exception. Just letting it be is the best policy right now. No need to start new battles.