Did you notice a difference in speed when running the compilation instead of the java thing itself? I never did here so I simply save the disk space.
vp
Good one Volker
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Windows compiles are much more faster than original java ones.
If I find an engine that I get both versions working on Arena 201,
I will try to compare the speed performance.
The author of CuckooChess has stated that the JA compile of his program is faster than the native .jar file under Windows, but that under Linux the .jar file runs faster than the JA compile under Windows.
It should be pointed out that Excelsior JET can create "native" compiles for linux as well, not only windows.
Regarding the error message, contact the support people at Excelsior JET. I contacted them before with problems on a different app and they found out the problem and asked me to upgrade the JET version and retry, which worked for me. Turned out there was a bug with an older JET version.
shiv wrote:It should be pointed out that Excelsior JET can create "native" compiles for linux as well, not only windows.
Regarding the error message, contact the support people at Excelsior JET. I contacted them before with problems on a different app and they found out the problem and asked me to upgrade the JET version and retry, which worked for me. Turned out there was a bug with an older JET version.
Thanks.
My problem now is that I could not get them working, because they crash.
As I have downloaded the latest version (eval) of the compiler,
making windows execs will be the next thing I'll try. I'll report further,
if I make progress on this matter.
Try to compile a simple hello world program and see if it works. I believe JET first compiles the JDK into "native code". If that worked fine, then a hello world program should compile fine as well.