testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
Moderator: Ras
-
NATIONAL12
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
- Location: bristol,uk
testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
this is great fun for me being a Rybka fanboy.lets just say Fire is getting slaughtered only 116 games so far.will post in due course. 
-
Damir
- Posts: 2905
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
- Full name: Damir Desevac
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
Why don't you try Houdini instead ?
-
gerold
- Posts: 10121
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
- Location: van buren,missouri
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
Be nice to see the results. Also the settings of the two.NATIONAL12 wrote:this is great fun for me being a Rybka fanboy.lets just say Fire is getting slaughtered only 116 games so far.will post in due course.
Best,
Gerold.
-
NATIONAL12
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
- Location: bristol,uk
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
settings are.out of box.first 110 games book Amazing(based on high quality corr games) last 60 HS MasterBook 2.ponder off,win64 turbo 3 tbs.
Final update
Rybka 4-Fire 1.31
+62=91-17 (170 games) +94 ELO.
to many exceptions to play more,all pairs of games when an exception occured were deleated.
i will post a few of the games if you wish.
Final update
Rybka 4-Fire 1.31
+62=91-17 (170 games) +94 ELO.
to many exceptions to play more,all pairs of games when an exception occured were deleated.
i will post a few of the games if you wish.
-
alpha123
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
Ouch. They were right about Rybka 4 being a monster on big hardware. BTW, what were Rybka's t/c settings?
Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.
Peter
Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.
Peter
-
NATIONAL12
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
- Location: bristol,uk
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
as i said, out of box.alpha123 wrote:Ouch. They were right about Rybka 4 being a monster on big hardware. BTW, what were Rybka's t/c settings?
Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.
Peter
Houdini crashes to much.sorry.
-
NATIONAL12
- Posts: 305
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
- Location: bristol,uk
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
[Event "0000-7160E6B413, Blitz:4'+2""]
[Site "0000"]
[Date "2010.06.05"]
[Round "16"]
[White "Fire 1.3 x64"]
[Black "Deep Rybka 4 x64"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E08"]
[Annotator "0.17;0.03"]
[PlyCount "92"]
[TimeControl "240+2"]
{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme CPU X9775 @ 3.20GHz 3591 MHz W=17.5 plies; 8,
558kN/s; AmazingCorr.ctg B=14.9 plies; 435kN/s; 67 TBAs; AmazingCorr.ctg} 1.
d4 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 2. c4 {B 0} e6 {B 0} 3. Nf3 {B 0} d5 {B 0} 4. g3 {B 0} Bb4+
{B 0} 5. Bd2 {B 0} Be7 {B 0} 6. Bg2 {B 0} O-O {B 0} 7. O-O {B 0} c6 {B 0} 8.
Qc2 {B 0} Nbd7 {B 0} 9. Bf4 {B 0} b6 {B 0} 10. Rd1 {B 0} Bb7 {B 0 Both last
book move} 11. cxd5 {0.17/18 12} cxd5 {0.03/17 15 (Nxd5)} 12. Qd3 {0.10/19 9
(Nc3)} Ne4 {0.01/18 24} 13. Rc1 {0.02/19 16 (Nc3)} g5 {-0.18/18 21 (Bd6)} 14.
Be3 {-0.05/18 8} f5 {-0.16/18 11 (a5)} 15. Nc3 {0.11/18 5} f4 {-0.16/16 9} 16.
gxf4 {0.05/19 9} gxf4 {-0.16/14 2} 17. Bd2 {0.05/18 0} Rf7 {-0.27/14 7} 18. Bh3
{0.00/18 12 (a4)} Rf6 {-0.50/15 12 (Nf8)} 19. Kf1 {0.08/18 9} Rh6 {-0.53/16 5
(Bb4)} 20. Bg4 {0.00/20 18 (Bg2)} Bd6 {-0.69/14 5 (Qf8)} 21. h3 {-0.13/16 8
(a3)} Qe7 {-1.11/12 3 (a6)} 22. Nh2 {-0.65/15 7 (Qb5)} Ndf6 {-1.79/14 11 (Rh4)}
23. Rc2 {-1.28/15 7 (Nb5)} Nxd2+ {-2.75/12 2 (Ng5)} 24. Rxd2 {-3.06/18 9} f3 {
-2.74/14 2} 25. exf3 {-3.42/19 54} Bxh2 {-2.85/14 1} 26. Kg2 {-3.59/19 54} Bd6
{-2.86/15 4} 27. Nb5 {-3.68/18 28 (Rc2)} Nh5 {-3.48/13 3} 28. Bxh5 {-3.81/18 6}
Rxh5 {-3.52/14 2} 29. Nxd6 {-3.99/18 13} Qxd6 {-3.52/15 3} 30. b4 {-4.01/18 1
(Qe3)} Kh8 {-4.10/15 4 (Qxb4)} 31. b5 {-4.31/17 3} Rg8+ {-4.37/14 4} 32. Kf1 {
-4.31/16 0} Rxh3 {-4.49/15 2} 33. Re1 {-4.60/18 4} Qb4 {-4.61/15 4 (Bc8)} 34.
Rdd1 {-4.72/17 3 (a3)} Qc4 {-5.05/15 5 (Rf8)} 35. Rxe6 {-5.28/18 7} Qxa2 {-5.
20/15 3} 36. Rd2 {-5.00/16 0} Rh1+ {-5.89/13 2} 37. Ke2 {0.01/0 0} Qa1 {-5.89/
14 2} 38. Rd1 {-6.35/19 6} Rxd1 {-6.41/14 4} 39. Qxd1 {-6.19/16 0} Qb2+ {-6.41/
15 2} 40. Ke3 {-6.70/19 5} Qxb5 {-6.41/16 2 (Bc8)} 41. Qc2 {-5.41/16 3 (Qe1)}
Qb4 {-8.40/14 11} 42. Qd2 {-5.52/18 2 (Re5)} Qa3+ {-11.21/15 2} 43. Qd3 {-5.52/
16 0} Qa1 {-11.21/15 1 (Qxd3+)} 44. Re5 {-10.97/16 4} Ba6 {-12.79/16 10} 45.
Qc2 {-10.81/14 0} Qe1+ {-12.93/16 10 (Rf8)} 46. Kf4 {-11.55/19 4} Qh1 {-12.93/
15 1 (Qb4)} 0-1
[Site "0000"]
[Date "2010.06.05"]
[Round "16"]
[White "Fire 1.3 x64"]
[Black "Deep Rybka 4 x64"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E08"]
[Annotator "0.17;0.03"]
[PlyCount "92"]
[TimeControl "240+2"]
{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme CPU X9775 @ 3.20GHz 3591 MHz W=17.5 plies; 8,
558kN/s; AmazingCorr.ctg B=14.9 plies; 435kN/s; 67 TBAs; AmazingCorr.ctg} 1.
d4 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 2. c4 {B 0} e6 {B 0} 3. Nf3 {B 0} d5 {B 0} 4. g3 {B 0} Bb4+
{B 0} 5. Bd2 {B 0} Be7 {B 0} 6. Bg2 {B 0} O-O {B 0} 7. O-O {B 0} c6 {B 0} 8.
Qc2 {B 0} Nbd7 {B 0} 9. Bf4 {B 0} b6 {B 0} 10. Rd1 {B 0} Bb7 {B 0 Both last
book move} 11. cxd5 {0.17/18 12} cxd5 {0.03/17 15 (Nxd5)} 12. Qd3 {0.10/19 9
(Nc3)} Ne4 {0.01/18 24} 13. Rc1 {0.02/19 16 (Nc3)} g5 {-0.18/18 21 (Bd6)} 14.
Be3 {-0.05/18 8} f5 {-0.16/18 11 (a5)} 15. Nc3 {0.11/18 5} f4 {-0.16/16 9} 16.
gxf4 {0.05/19 9} gxf4 {-0.16/14 2} 17. Bd2 {0.05/18 0} Rf7 {-0.27/14 7} 18. Bh3
{0.00/18 12 (a4)} Rf6 {-0.50/15 12 (Nf8)} 19. Kf1 {0.08/18 9} Rh6 {-0.53/16 5
(Bb4)} 20. Bg4 {0.00/20 18 (Bg2)} Bd6 {-0.69/14 5 (Qf8)} 21. h3 {-0.13/16 8
(a3)} Qe7 {-1.11/12 3 (a6)} 22. Nh2 {-0.65/15 7 (Qb5)} Ndf6 {-1.79/14 11 (Rh4)}
23. Rc2 {-1.28/15 7 (Nb5)} Nxd2+ {-2.75/12 2 (Ng5)} 24. Rxd2 {-3.06/18 9} f3 {
-2.74/14 2} 25. exf3 {-3.42/19 54} Bxh2 {-2.85/14 1} 26. Kg2 {-3.59/19 54} Bd6
{-2.86/15 4} 27. Nb5 {-3.68/18 28 (Rc2)} Nh5 {-3.48/13 3} 28. Bxh5 {-3.81/18 6}
Rxh5 {-3.52/14 2} 29. Nxd6 {-3.99/18 13} Qxd6 {-3.52/15 3} 30. b4 {-4.01/18 1
(Qe3)} Kh8 {-4.10/15 4 (Qxb4)} 31. b5 {-4.31/17 3} Rg8+ {-4.37/14 4} 32. Kf1 {
-4.31/16 0} Rxh3 {-4.49/15 2} 33. Re1 {-4.60/18 4} Qb4 {-4.61/15 4 (Bc8)} 34.
Rdd1 {-4.72/17 3 (a3)} Qc4 {-5.05/15 5 (Rf8)} 35. Rxe6 {-5.28/18 7} Qxa2 {-5.
20/15 3} 36. Rd2 {-5.00/16 0} Rh1+ {-5.89/13 2} 37. Ke2 {0.01/0 0} Qa1 {-5.89/
14 2} 38. Rd1 {-6.35/19 6} Rxd1 {-6.41/14 4} 39. Qxd1 {-6.19/16 0} Qb2+ {-6.41/
15 2} 40. Ke3 {-6.70/19 5} Qxb5 {-6.41/16 2 (Bc8)} 41. Qc2 {-5.41/16 3 (Qe1)}
Qb4 {-8.40/14 11} 42. Qd2 {-5.52/18 2 (Re5)} Qa3+ {-11.21/15 2} 43. Qd3 {-5.52/
16 0} Qa1 {-11.21/15 1 (Qxd3+)} 44. Re5 {-10.97/16 4} Ba6 {-12.79/16 10} 45.
Qc2 {-10.81/14 0} Qe1+ {-12.93/16 10 (Rf8)} 46. Kf4 {-11.55/19 4} Qh1 {-12.93/
15 1 (Qb4)} 0-1
-
alpha123
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
Thanks.NATIONAL12 wrote:as i said, out of box.alpha123 wrote:Ouch. They were right about Rybka 4 being a monster on big hardware. BTW, what were Rybka's t/c settings?
Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.
Peter
Houdini crashes to much.sorry.
Even the new one? I thought he fixed the 8-core version.
Peter
-
Dr.Wael Deeb
- Posts: 9773
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
- Location: Amman,Jordan
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
All in all,it seems like Rybka 4 is stronger than Fire 1.31....But Houdini is a different story indeed....
Dr.D
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
-
alpha123
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2
On big hardware like this, R4 is definitely stronger than Fire, and I'd guess, Houdini. On littler hardware it is much different.Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:All in all,it seems like Rybka 4 is stronger than Fire 1.31....But Houdini is a different story indeed....
Dr.D
Peter