testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

NATIONAL12
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
Location: bristol,uk

testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by NATIONAL12 »

this is great fun for me being a Rybka fanboy.lets just say Fire is getting slaughtered only 116 games so far.will post in due course. :)
Damir
Posts: 2905
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:53 pm
Location: Denmark
Full name: Damir Desevac

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by Damir »

Why don't you try Houdini instead ?
gerold
Posts: 10121
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 12:57 am
Location: van buren,missouri

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by gerold »

NATIONAL12 wrote:this is great fun for me being a Rybka fanboy.lets just say Fire is getting slaughtered only 116 games so far.will post in due course. :)
Be nice to see the results. Also the settings of the two.

Best,
Gerold.
NATIONAL12
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
Location: bristol,uk

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by NATIONAL12 »

settings are.out of box.first 110 games book Amazing(based on high quality corr games) last 60 HS MasterBook 2.ponder off,win64 turbo 3 tbs.

Final update

Rybka 4-Fire 1.31

+62=91-17 (170 games) +94 ELO.

to many exceptions to play more,all pairs of games when an exception occured were deleated.

i will post a few of the games if you wish.
alpha123
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by alpha123 »

Ouch. They were right about Rybka 4 being a monster on big hardware. BTW, what were Rybka's t/c settings?

Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.

Peter
NATIONAL12
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
Location: bristol,uk

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by NATIONAL12 »

alpha123 wrote:Ouch. They were right about Rybka 4 being a monster on big hardware. BTW, what were Rybka's t/c settings?

Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.

Peter
as i said, out of box.

Houdini crashes to much.sorry.
NATIONAL12
Posts: 305
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:31 pm
Location: bristol,uk

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by NATIONAL12 »

[Event "0000-7160E6B413, Blitz:4'+2""]
[Site "0000"]
[Date "2010.06.05"]
[Round "16"]
[White "Fire 1.3 x64"]
[Black "Deep Rybka 4 x64"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "E08"]
[Annotator "0.17;0.03"]
[PlyCount "92"]
[TimeControl "240+2"]

{Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Extreme CPU X9775 @ 3.20GHz 3591 MHz W=17.5 plies; 8,
558kN/s; AmazingCorr.ctg B=14.9 plies; 435kN/s; 67 TBAs; AmazingCorr.ctg} 1.
d4 {B 0} Nf6 {B 0} 2. c4 {B 0} e6 {B 0} 3. Nf3 {B 0} d5 {B 0} 4. g3 {B 0} Bb4+
{B 0} 5. Bd2 {B 0} Be7 {B 0} 6. Bg2 {B 0} O-O {B 0} 7. O-O {B 0} c6 {B 0} 8.
Qc2 {B 0} Nbd7 {B 0} 9. Bf4 {B 0} b6 {B 0} 10. Rd1 {B 0} Bb7 {B 0 Both last
book move} 11. cxd5 {0.17/18 12} cxd5 {0.03/17 15 (Nxd5)} 12. Qd3 {0.10/19 9
(Nc3)} Ne4 {0.01/18 24} 13. Rc1 {0.02/19 16 (Nc3)} g5 {-0.18/18 21 (Bd6)} 14.
Be3 {-0.05/18 8} f5 {-0.16/18 11 (a5)} 15. Nc3 {0.11/18 5} f4 {-0.16/16 9} 16.
gxf4 {0.05/19 9} gxf4 {-0.16/14 2} 17. Bd2 {0.05/18 0} Rf7 {-0.27/14 7} 18. Bh3
{0.00/18 12 (a4)} Rf6 {-0.50/15 12 (Nf8)} 19. Kf1 {0.08/18 9} Rh6 {-0.53/16 5
(Bb4)} 20. Bg4 {0.00/20 18 (Bg2)} Bd6 {-0.69/14 5 (Qf8)} 21. h3 {-0.13/16 8
(a3)} Qe7 {-1.11/12 3 (a6)} 22. Nh2 {-0.65/15 7 (Qb5)} Ndf6 {-1.79/14 11 (Rh4)}
23. Rc2 {-1.28/15 7 (Nb5)} Nxd2+ {-2.75/12 2 (Ng5)} 24. Rxd2 {-3.06/18 9} f3 {
-2.74/14 2} 25. exf3 {-3.42/19 54} Bxh2 {-2.85/14 1} 26. Kg2 {-3.59/19 54} Bd6
{-2.86/15 4} 27. Nb5 {-3.68/18 28 (Rc2)} Nh5 {-3.48/13 3} 28. Bxh5 {-3.81/18 6}
Rxh5 {-3.52/14 2} 29. Nxd6 {-3.99/18 13} Qxd6 {-3.52/15 3} 30. b4 {-4.01/18 1
(Qe3)} Kh8 {-4.10/15 4 (Qxb4)} 31. b5 {-4.31/17 3} Rg8+ {-4.37/14 4} 32. Kf1 {
-4.31/16 0} Rxh3 {-4.49/15 2} 33. Re1 {-4.60/18 4} Qb4 {-4.61/15 4 (Bc8)} 34.
Rdd1 {-4.72/17 3 (a3)} Qc4 {-5.05/15 5 (Rf8)} 35. Rxe6 {-5.28/18 7} Qxa2 {-5.
20/15 3} 36. Rd2 {-5.00/16 0} Rh1+ {-5.89/13 2} 37. Ke2 {0.01/0 0} Qa1 {-5.89/
14 2} 38. Rd1 {-6.35/19 6} Rxd1 {-6.41/14 4} 39. Qxd1 {-6.19/16 0} Qb2+ {-6.41/
15 2} 40. Ke3 {-6.70/19 5} Qxb5 {-6.41/16 2 (Bc8)} 41. Qc2 {-5.41/16 3 (Qe1)}
Qb4 {-8.40/14 11} 42. Qd2 {-5.52/18 2 (Re5)} Qa3+ {-11.21/15 2} 43. Qd3 {-5.52/
16 0} Qa1 {-11.21/15 1 (Qxd3+)} 44. Re5 {-10.97/16 4} Ba6 {-12.79/16 10} 45.
Qc2 {-10.81/14 0} Qe1+ {-12.93/16 10 (Rf8)} 46. Kf4 {-11.55/19 4} Qh1 {-12.93/
15 1 (Qb4)} 0-1
alpha123
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by alpha123 »

NATIONAL12 wrote:
alpha123 wrote:Ouch. They were right about Rybka 4 being a monster on big hardware. BTW, what were Rybka's t/c settings?

Try a R4 vs Houdini 1.01 match next.

Peter
as i said, out of box.

Houdini crashes to much.sorry.
Thanks.

Even the new one? I thought he fixed the 8-core version.

Peter
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

All in all,it seems like Rybka 4 is stronger than Fire 1.31....But Houdini is a different story indeed....
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
alpha123
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 5:13 am
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: testing R4 against Fire 1.31 on 8 cpu at 4+2

Post by alpha123 »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:All in all,it seems like Rybka 4 is stronger than Fire 1.31....But Houdini is a different story indeed....
Dr.D
On big hardware like this, R4 is definitely stronger than Fire, and I'd guess, Houdini. On littler hardware it is much different.

Peter