SWCR after 43.680 games ...

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7045
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

SWCR after 43.680 games ...

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

Hi there,

After 43.680 games, 25 different engines, 78 versions included
ELO are fixed to 2.800 for Shredder 12 32bit. All other engines are derived from that fixed number.

Calculated with: Bayesian 0056

Code: Select all

01. Rybka 4 x64                  2.945 23 22  880 82% 2.701 29%
--. Rybka 3 x64                  2.911 23 22  840 78% 2.693 28%
02. Stockfish 1.7.1 JA x64       2.901 19 18 1120 76% 2.712 34%
--. Rybka 4 w32                  2.894 21 21  880 75% 2.709 33%
--. Stockfish 1.7.1 JA w32       2.875 18 18 1200 75% 2.690 31%
--. Stockfish 1.8.0a JA w32      2.866 22 21  800 74% 2.695 36%
--. Stockfish 1.8.0 JA w32       2.863 21 21  800 74% 2.695 37%
--. Rybka 3 w32                  2.860 16 16 1520 74% 2.689 31%
03. Naum 4.2 x64                 2.833 18 18 1120 67% 2.714 38%
--. Stockfish 1.6.3 JA w32       2.827 18 18 1080 71% 2.680 36%
--. Naum 4.2 w32                 2.827 16 16 1400 68% 2.704 36%
04. Critter 0.70 x64             2.812 20 19  880 65% 2.707 38%
--. Naum 4.1 w32                 2.811 19 19  920 68% 2.686 35%
05. Komodo 1.2 JA x64            2.803 19 19  880 64% 2.707 41%
--. Stockfish 1.6.0 JA w32       2.802 19 18  960 68% 2.687 39%
06. Shredder 12 w32              2.800 11 11 3040 63% 2.707 37%
--. Komodo 1.0 JA x64            2.797 20 20  840 64% 2.699 40%
--. Shredder 12 x64              2.793 18 18 1080 61% 2.713 35%
--. Naum 4.0 w32                 2.785 19 18  960 65% 2.682 38%
07. Deep Fritz 12 w32            2.780 15 15 1480 61% 2.707 42%
--. Critter 0.70 w32             2.774 19 19  880 59% 2.715 40%
--. Komodo 1.2 JA w32            2.760 19 19  880 56% 2.715 41%
--. Fritz 12 w32                 2.746 16 16 1160 59% 2.688 44%
08. Thinker 5.4d Inert x64       2.742 17 17 1120 53% 2.718 42%
09. Spark 0.5 x64                2.740 19 19  880 54% 2.710 38%
10. Hiarcs 13.1 w32              2.737 19 19  880 53% 2.716 42%
--. Stockfish 1.5.1 JA w32       2.731 19 19  840 59% 2.672 43%
11. Zappa Mexico II x64          2.730 17 17 1120 52% 2.718 41%
12. Protector 1.3.4 JA x64       2.728 17 18 1080 51% 2.719 37%
--. Spark 0.4 x64                2.724 20 20  840 53% 2.702 40%
13. Fruit 09_07_05 x64           2.723 17 17 1120 51% 2.718 35%
--. Komodo 1.0 JA w32            2.716 16 16 1200 53% 2.695 40%
--. Spark 0.5 w32                2.713 19 19  880 49% 2.717 40%
--. Thinker 5.4d Inert w32       2.712 13 13 1960 51% 2.705 42%
--. Critter 0.60 x64             2.706 20 20  840 50% 2.703 38%
14. Junior 11.2 x64              2.694 20 20  880 47% 2.712 32%
--. Doch 1.3.4 JA w32            2.690 19 19  840 51% 2.686 44%
15. Sjeng WC-2008 x64            2.690 17 17 1120 46% 2.719 37%
--. Protector 1.3.5 x64          2.690 20 20  840 47% 2.712 39%
--. Critter 0.60 w32             2.688 19 19  920 50% 2.688 39%
--. Junior 11.2 w32              2.688 20 20  880 46% 2.719 33%
--. Spark 0.4 w32                2.686 19 19  880 49% 2.692 43%
--. Protector 1.3.4 JA w32       2.679 19 19  920 48% 2.691 39%
16. Onno 1.1.1 x64               2.677 20 20  840 46% 2.705 40%
--. Cyclone xTreme Wrath w32     2.676 17 17 1080 47% 2.698 41%
--. Onno 1.2.70 x64              2.676 19 19  880 45% 2.713 39%
--. Protector 1.3.2 w32          2.674 17 17 1160 47% 2.695 41%
--. Protector 1.3.5 JA w32       2.669 19 19  880 43% 2.719 41%
--. Junior 2010 w32              2.669 16 16 1240 47% 2.691 36%
--. Hiarcs 12.1 w32              2.667 19 19  880 47% 2.689 41%
--. Protector 1.3.1b w32         2.667 19 19  840 47% 2.690 42%
--. Doch 1.2 JA w32              2.666 19 19  840 48% 2.679 40%
--. Hiarcs 12.1 Sharpen PV w32   2.665 16 16 1280 45% 2.699 40%
--. Sjeng WC-2008 w32            2.664 13 13 1960 44% 2.706 37%
--. Zappa Mexico II w32          2.662 13 13 1960 44% 2.706 42%
--. Spark 0.3a w32               2.656 17 17 1120 44% 2.698 41%
--. Junior 11.1a x64             2.654 20 20  840 43% 2.706 32%
--. Doch 09.980 JA w32           2.652 19 19  840 46% 2.676 42%
--. Junior 11.1a w32             2.645 18 19  960 44% 2.692 36%
--. Spark 0.3 w32                2.643 19 19  880 43% 2.691 42%
17. Loop 2007 x64                2.636 17 18 1120 38% 2.721 36%
--. Onno 1.1.1 w32               2.631 14 15 1520 40% 2.696 41%
--. Onno 1.2.70 w32              2.629 19 19  880 37% 2.721 39%
18. Twisted Logic 20100131x x64  2.617 18 18 1120 35% 2.722 32%
--. Fruit 05/11/03 w32           2.616 13 13 1960 37% 2.707 41%
--. Loop 2007 w32                2.615 20 20  880 35% 2.722 36%
--. Loop 13.6 w32                2.615 15 15 1520 38% 2.696 39%
--. Critter 0.52b w32            2.614 18 18 1040 38% 2.699 37%
--. Glaurung 2.2 JA w32          2.610 18 18 1080 37% 2.700 36%
19. Ktulu 9.03 w32               2.608 16 16 1480 36% 2.712 30%
20. SmarThink 1.20 x64           2.604 18 18 1120 34% 2.722 33%
--. SmarThink 1.20 w32           2.596 13 13 1960 34% 2.708 37%
--. Twisted Logic 20100131x w32  2.575 15 15 1640 31% 2.711 30%
21. Spike 1.2 Turin w32          2.573 16 16 1440 31% 2.711 34%
22. Scorpio 2.6 JA x64           2.561 18 18 1120 28% 2.724 32%
23. Crafty 23.2 JA x64           2.560 18 19 1120 28% 2.724 30%
24. Chronos 1.99 x64             2.558 18 18 1120 27% 2.724 33% (ponder not possible)
25. Daydreamer 1.75 JA x64       2.527 19 19 1120 24% 2.725 30%

Date range            = 2009.10.26 - 2010.08.10
Average White ELO     = 2.704,37
Average Black ELO     = 2.704,37
Maximum ELO distance  = 418
Average ELO distance  = 108.007
Number of White wins  = 15885 (36.4%)
Number of draws       = 16331 (37.4%)
Number of Black wins  = 11464 (26.2%)
White score           = 55.1%
Black score           = 44.9%
ECO A games           = 10920 (25.0%)
ECO B games           =  9706 (22.2%)
ECO C games           =  5853 (13.4%)
ECO D games           = 10687 (24.5%)
ECO E games           =  6514 (14.9%)

Code: Select all

Conditions:
Windows XP Prof. x64 Edition
SClassic 4, Fritz 11 GUI
Random-Books 4.1

ponder = on
each engine = 1 core
resign / learning = off
hashtables = 256Mb
4TBs Nal., Gav., egbb, SBases
40 moves in 10 minutes

Intel® Core™2 Quad
4x Q9550, 2,83GHz
Downloads (PGN as ZIP files) and the ratinglist for w32 & x64 can be found on my webpage:

Frank's Chess Page
http://www.amateurschach.de
User avatar
Dr.Wael Deeb
Posts: 9773
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:44 pm
Location: Amman,Jordan

Re: SWCR after 43.680 games ...

Post by Dr.Wael Deeb »

Great work Frank....in a short period of time your rating lst has become one of the most popular and respected rating lists in our community....
Cheers,
Dr.D
_No one can hit as hard as life.But it ain’t about how hard you can hit.It’s about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.How much you can take and keep moving forward….
Frank Quisinsky
Posts: 7045
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 7:16 pm
Location: Gutweiler, Germany
Full name: Frank Quisinsky

Re: SWCR after 43.680 games ...

Post by Frank Quisinsky »

He Wael,

I think that I have now a good start point for the "new" x64 list. New is also the list from all games (x64 and w32). I do in the latest 2 weeks a lot on the webpage.

In the next time the list will be more and more actual and more amateurs will be add.

So far the machines I used can play around 8.000 games per months. SWCR 40 in 10 with ponder is around CCRL 40 in 16, around 40 in 8 CEGT and around 40 in 5 IPON. So its nice to compare the results with the others. A big different to the others is that I am playing without resign mode. So game avarage in SWCR is 85 moves. With resing mode game average is around 67 moves. With the advantage, I can see more engine errors in endgames.

Perhaps next year I will start a list with a longer time control.

Have fun with this work.

Best
Frank
Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 3018
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Antalya/Turkey

Re: SWCR after 43.680 games ...

Post by Sedat Canbaz »

Dr.Wael Deeb wrote:Great work Frank....in a short period of time your rating lst has become one of the most popular and respected rating lists in our community....
Cheers,
Dr.D
Hello Wael !

Totally i agree with you...just i'd like to add that Frank Quisinsky's rating lists are become popular not on nowadays,his rating lists are one of the top since many years

In other words,Frank's work is just amazing !

Best Regards,
Sedat