Stockfish vs 2 DeepSaros Blitz Settings!

[geots]

DeepSaros 2.3jT vs Stockfish 2.2.1



1CPU/32bit
128MB Hash
Bases=NONE
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games


Stockfish 2.2.1...........+35.........+15/-10/=25.......55.00%.......27.5/50

DeepSaros ver.2.3jT....-35.........+10/-15/=25.......45.00%.......22.5/50



Try a different value.............


DeepSaros 2.3jT7h vs Stockfish 2.2.1


DeepSaros ver.2.3jT7h.....+14......+14/-12/=24.....52.00%.....26.0/50

Stockfish 2.2.1................. -14.......+12/-14/=24....48.00%......24.0/50


Above a couple of experimental blitz settings w/DeepSaros. Both results fell well within the + or - error margin. Actually a week ago the default setting had the highest rating in the 3 matches against Stockfish: +49. Which is not uncommon. As yet, best I can tell is that neither setting is a disaster or a monster. Try them at home yourself if you have as much time to waste as I do.


Oops,

g
e
o
r
g
e

[geots]

Actually the "T" is not a value change. It is a completely different exe that is an experimental blitz idea. The "7h" could be considered a value change. Thought if mentioning it, the least I could do is clarify the issue.

george

[solis]

Hi George,
in your opinion which one is the strongest engine of the Ippolit family that you have tested recently.

[geots]

Hi George,
in your opinion which one is the strongest engine of the Ippolit family that you have tested recently.

Hi Misha. As far as I am concerned, there is no question or doubt. The strongest to date is PP's compile- Ivanhoe B47f0.2 It is stronger than PPs compile Ivanhoe B46e and Mowery's tuned IvanHoe 9.47cWHB.

If there is an Ivanhoe version in existence stronger than B47f0.2, I have not been able to find it. Of course my results are all 32-bit. I cannot speak for 64-bit- but soon I will be testing 64-bit as well.


Best,

george