Vitruvius_1.0C_x32 vs. Rybka 4.1 w32
This match was run in accordance with the blitz settings. Let us check it out.
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Rybka 4.1 used Nalimov)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games
Vitruvius _1.0C_x32......+14.........+11/-9/=30......52.00%......26.0/50
Rybka 4.1 w32................-14.........+9/-11/=30......48.00%......24.0/50
More results to come.
It is medication time-
g
e
o
r
g
e
Testing the Commercial Vitruvius vs. Rybka!
Moderator: Ras
-
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2011 11:25 am
Re: Testing the Commercial Vitruvius vs. Rybka!
Thanks George,geots wrote:Vitruvius_1.0C_x32 vs. Rybka 4.1 w32
This match was run in accordance with the blitz settings. Let us check it out.
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Rybka 4.1 used Nalimov)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games
Vitruvius _1.0C_x32......+14.........+11/-9/=30......52.00%......26.0/50
Rybka 4.1 w32................-14.........+9/-11/=30......48.00%......24.0/50
More results to come.
It is medication time-
g
e
o
r
g
e
this match shows that Vitruvius can compete at high level, at least at blitz.
Best Regards
MM
-
- Posts: 4790
- Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am
Re: Testing the Commercial Vitruvius vs. Rybka!
MM wrote:Thanks George,geots wrote:Vitruvius_1.0C_x32 vs. Rybka 4.1 w32
This match was run in accordance with the blitz settings. Let us check it out.
1CPU/32bit
128MB hash
Bases=NONE (Rybka 4.1 used Nalimov)
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 12.32 book w/12-move limit
40/3 Repeating
Match=50 games
Vitruvius _1.0C_x32......+14.........+11/-9/=30......52.00%......26.0/50
Rybka 4.1 w32................-14.........+9/-11/=30......48.00%......24.0/50
More results to come.
It is medication time-
g
e
o
r
g
e
this match shows that Vitruvius can compete at high level, at least at blitz.
Best Regards
Yes, it can compete. Probably at both blitz and long controls. The only issue is time. It will take a bit to find the exact settings that are optimal for both.
Best regards,
george