Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by gleperlier »

Hannibal is damned strong in long games :wink:

[Event "40 coups en 120 min; reste en 60 min"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2012.05.18"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Delphil 2.9b"]
[Black "Hannibal 1.2"]
[Result "0-1"]

1. e4 {Biblio. 0s} c5 {Biblio. 0s} 2. Nf3 {Biblio. 0s} e6
{Biblio. 0s} 3. d4 {Biblio. 0s} cxd4 {Biblio. 0s} 4. Nxd4
{Biblio. 0s} Nc6 {Biblio. 0s} 5. Nc3 {Biblio. 0s} Qc7
{Biblio. 0s} 6. f4 {Biblio. 0s} Nxd4 {+0.18/22 3:59m}
7. Qxd4 {+0.69/15 7:04m} b6 {+0.42/24 0s (Cf6)} 8. Bd2
{+0.40/14 6:50m (f5)} Bb7 {+0.16/23 3:12m} 9. Bd3 {+0.35/15
3:25m (Cb5)} Nf6 {-0.03/23 2:33m} 10. Nb5 {+0.54/14 44s
(De3)} Qc6 {-0.05/25 2:38m} 11. Qe5 {+0.40/14 44s} d6
{-0.09/25 3:00m} 12. Qc3 {+0.22/14 28s} Qxc3 {-0.06/26
2:56m} 13. Bxc3 {+0.20/16 38s} Kd7 {-0.06/27 3:39m}
14. Bxf6 {+0.15/15 3:45m (e5)} gxf6 {-0.29/22 1:42m}
15. Rf1 {+0.14/15 2:00m (O-O)} a6 {-0.32/21 1:49m} 16. Nc3
{+0.13/14 1:57m (Cd4)} b5 {-0.41/22 2:13m (Fg7)} 17. a4
{+0.07/13 3:50m (a3)} b4 {-0.46/25 2:33m} 18. Ne2 {+0.06/15
1:17m} Kc7 {-0.48/22 1:43m (h5)} 19. Rc1 {+0.13/14 3:57m
(c4)} d5 {-0.64/23 2:21m (Fe7)} 20. e5 {+0.08/15 3:57m} Bc5
{-0.67/25 52s (Tg8)} 21. Kd2 {+0.20/14 3:57m} h5 {-0.87/24
22s (Tag8)} 22. c3 {+0.30/13 3:57m (a5)} Kb6 {-0.88/22
2:36m} 23. exf6 {+0.27/12 1:20m (cxb4)} Rag8 {-0.80/22
2:22m (bxc3+)} 24. g3 {+0.39/13 4:07m} h4 {-1.03/24 21s}
25. cxb4 {+0.11/13 3:45m (Tf3)} Bxb4+ {-1.11/23 1:45m}
26. Kc2 {-0.15/15 2:23m} Rh6 {-1.09/26 3:43m (hxg3)}
27. Kb3 {-0.26/15 4:16m} a5 {-0.95/27 5:04m} 28. Ka2
{-0.50/16 3:27m (Tc2)} Rxf6 {-1.16/27 4:59m} 29. Bb5
{-0.63/16 0s} Rh6 {-1.11/26 5:28m (hxg3)} 30. Rc2 {-0.71/19
14:11m} hxg3 {-1.02/28 0s} 31. hxg3 {-0.71/18 3:46m} Rh2
{-1.00/28 1:48m (Tc8)} 32. Rfc1 {-0.80/16 3:46m} Rd8
{-1.02/29 10:02m (d4)} 33. Kb3 {-0.70/17 11:20m (Cd4)} Rf2
{-1.18/24 4:03m (Tdh8)} 34. Ka2 {-0.72/16 5:24m} Bf8
{-1.07/27 47s (Td6)} 35. Ka1 {-0.34/16 6:45m (Rb3)} Bd6
{-1.13/27 4:53m} 36. Bd3 {-0.56/15 0s (Tc3)} f6 {-1.47/27
4:36m} 37. Rh1 {-0.90/15 0s} Bc5 {-1.47/26 6:22m (Fc6)}
38. Rh6 {-0.30/13 2:15m (Rb1)} Rf3 {-1.65/25 4:22m} 39. Rd2
{-0.46/15 0s} Rf8 {-1.70/27 8:16m} 40. Bb5 {-0.56/16 0s
(Th5)} Rf1+ {-1.56/28 7:08m} 41. Ka2 {-0.57/17 0s} Rf2
{-1.57/29 2:35m} 42. Rd1 {-0.70/16 0s} d4 {-1.49/27 1:37m}
43. Nc1 {-0.83/15 0s} Bd5+ {-1.47/25 1:45m} 44. Ka1
{-0.82/15 0s} Rf3 {-1.47/26 4:42m (Tg2)} 45. Rg6 {-0.80/15
3:13m} Re3 {-1.38/26 0s} 46. g4 {-1.00/15 1:31m (Cd3)} Bf3
{-1.87/24 1:11m (Fd6)} 47. Rf1 {-0.92/14 1:29m (Td3)} Be4
{-2.24/22 1:14m} 48. Rg7 {-1.70/16 1:40m} Rd8 {-2.77/25
22s} 49. Rd1 {-2.11/16 3:52m} Bc2 {-3.12/28 0s (Ff3)}
50. Rd2 {-2.32/16 3:57m} d3 {-3.12/30 0s} 51. Ka2 {-2.49/15
1:13m} Bb4 {-3.12/31 37s (Td5)} 52. Rxd3 {-2.51/18 2:22m}
Rdxd3 {-3.12/32 0s (Fxd3)} 53. Nxd3 {-2.69/17 1:07m} Bxd3
{-3.28/31 54s} 54. Bxd3 {-2.69/16 11s} Rxd3 {-3.28/26 6s}
55. Rf7 {-3.06/16 59s} Bd6 {-3.47/29 36s (Tg3)} 56. Rxf6
{-2.88/16 2:08m} Rd4 {-3.47/31 0s} 57. Rxe6 {-3.42/16 2:02m
(b3)} Rxa4+ {-3.52/25 58s} 58. Kb3 {-3.42/16 0s} Rb4+
{-3.54/25 17s} 59. Kc2 {-3.42/16 40s} Kc6 {-3.66/27 1:14m}
60. Rf6 {-3.80/16 39s (Te2)} Rxf4 {-4.02/27 1:29m} 61. Rxf4
{-4.80/16 21s (Tg6)} Bxf4 {-14.75/25 13s} 62. b3
{-M-1372/40 2:32m (Rd3)} Kc5 {-15.27/28 1:26m (Fd6)} 63. g5
{-M-1376/40 2:34m (Rd3)} Bxg5 {-119.44/25 1:00m} 64. Kc3
{-M-1377/40 0s} Bf6+ {-119.44/25 1:42m} 65. Kd3 {-M-1377/40
0s (Rd2)} Kb4 {-119.44/24 47s} 66. Kc2 {-M-1377/40 0s} Bc3
{-119.44/23 1:36m (Fd4)} 67. Kd3 {Biblio. 0s} Kxb3
{-119.44/19 1:32m} 68. Ke4 {Biblio. 0s (Re3)} a4
{-119.44/18 1:11m} 69. Kd5 {Biblio. 0s (Rd3)} a3
{-119.44/16 1:08m} 70. Kc6 {Biblio. 0s (Re4)} a2
{-119.34/14 1:06m} 71. Kb7 {Biblio. 0s (Rd7)} a1=Q {-M8/14
21s} 72. Kc7 {Biblio. 0s (Rc6)} Qd1 {-M5/11 7s} 73. Kc8
{Biblio. 0s} Qd5 {-M5/8 0s} 74. Kc7 {Biblio. 0s} Be5+
{-M3/11 0s} 75. Kb6 {Biblio. 0s} Bb8 {-M2/11 0s} 76. Ka6
{Biblio. 0s} Qc6+ {-M1/11 0s} 77. Ka5 {Biblio. 0s} Bc7#
{-M0/12 0s} 0-1

[Event "40 coups en 120 min; reste en 60 min"]
[Site "Engine Match"]
[Date "2012.05.19"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Hannibal 1.2"]
[Black "Delphil 2.9b"]
[Result "1-0"]

1. e4 {Biblio. 0s} c5 {Biblio. 0s} 2. Nf3 {Biblio. 0s} e6
{Biblio. 0s} 3. d4 {Biblio. 0s} cxd4 {Biblio. 0s} 4. Nxd4
{Biblio. 0s} Nc6 {Biblio. 0s} 5. Nc3 {Biblio. 0s} Qc7
{Biblio. 0s} 6. f4 {Biblio. 0s} Bb4 {+0.73/12 3:26m}
7. Ndb5 {+0.45/21 2:13m} Qa5 {+0.78/13 1:12m (Db8)} 8. a3
{+0.75/24 3:43m} Bxc3+ {+0.89/13 0s} 9. bxc3 {+0.75/23
3:13m (Cxc3)} Nf6 {+0.90/13 3:36m (d5)} 10. Nd6+ {+1.03/24
3:18m} Kf8 {+0.85/14 17s} 11. Qd3 {+1.05/24 3:03m (e5)} b6
{+0.89/13 3:42m (Ce8)} 12. Bb2 {+1.25/23 4:27m (Fd2)} Nd8
{+0.83/13 3:42m (Ce8)} 13. O-O-O {+1.37/24 5:56m} Bb7
{+0.82/14 0s (Cb7)} 14. e5 {+2.37/23 4:57m (c4)} Nd5
{+1.30/16 7:42m} 15. c4 {+2.48/24 0s} Nc7 {+1.49/16 3:42m}
16. f5 {+2.56/23 31s (Cxb7)} Bc6 {+1.48/14 11:06m} 17. Kb1
{+2.38/23 0s (Fe2)} Ne8 {+1.04/13 3:23m (exf5)} 18. f6
{+3.62/20 1:53m (Fe2)} g5 {+2.23/15 10:11m (gxf6)} 19. Nxe8
{+5.14/21 56s (h4)} Kxe8 {+1.53/11 1s (Cb7)} 20. h4
{+3.30/24 4:15m} g4 {+1.88/18 2:12m (gxh4)} 21. Be2
{+2.00/24 2:25m (h5)} h5 {+0.40/12 12s (Cb7)} 22. Qd6
{+0.43/24 30:02m (Td2)} Qc5 {+0.26/14 27s} 23. Qc7
{+0.52/23 2:04m (Dd2)} Nb7 {+0.19/16 3:36m} 24. Ka2
{+0.43/25 13s} Rd8 {+0.35/17 7:00m (Rf8)} 25. Bd4 {+0.81/27
1:29m} Qa5 {+0.36/17 1:54m} 26. Rhg1 {+0.97/27 1:40m} Kf8
{+0.41/16 1:49m} 27. Kb2 {+1.13/28 34s} Qa4 {+0.41/16
3:02m} 28. Bd3 {+1.13/28 53s} Ra8 {+0.41/17 2:46m (Te8)}
29. Bc3 {+1.29/25 1:57m} Kg8 {+0.41/17 1:46m} 30. Bb4
{+1.39/24 10s} Rh6 {+0.41/15 3:44m (Td8)} 31. Rdf1
{+1.67/24 3:18m (Ra2)} Re8 {+0.54/16 11:48m (Rh8)} 32. g3
{+1.73/24 2:09m (Tb1)} Ra8 {+0.69/14 6:07m (Th8)} 33. Rf4
{+2.16/27 3:29m} Nc5 {+1.10/16 1:51m} 34. Bxc5 {+2.28/27
46s} bxc5 {+1.15/16 2:01m} 35. Rb1 {+2.38/26 1:52m} Qa6
{+1.19/16 1:03m} 36. Qd6 {+2.56/26 4:20m} Qc8 {+1.50/17
2:15m} 37. Qxc5 {+2.69/26 2:41m} a5 {+1.52/16 51s (Th8)}
38. Qe3 {+3.47/27 4:03m (Rc3)} Qf8 {+2.48/16 4:27m} 39. Ka2
{+3.80/26 1:40m} Kh8 {+2.98/16 2:46m} 40. Rd4 {+4.10/30
12:00m} Rh7 {+3.14/19 0s} 41. Be4 {+4.34/23 1:33m (Fxh7)}
Qg8 {+2.99/16 4:57m (a4)} 42. Rxd7 {+7.54/26 1:00m} Bxd7
{+4.23/16 2:02m} 43. Bxa8 {+9.43/30 0s} Qxa8 {+8.09/17
4:25m} 44. Qd4 {+19.89/32 18:44m (Dd2)} Ba4 {+9.54/18 4:06m
(Dc8)} 45. Qd6 {+19.56/28 10s} 1-0
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by lucasart »

do you have to create a new thread everytime you play 2 games ?
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by gleperlier »

lucasart wrote:do you have to create a new thread everytime you play 2 games ?
No I don't have to.

By the way, as each game can last 6 hours , theses two games are played in 10 hours average. I guess that having a look at theses games are more valuable than 500 bullets or 100 blitz 3.... what do you think ?

But maybe you are just interested in 1000 bullet of Strelka to see if it's better than Houdini... waou....

Gab
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by gleperlier »

@Julien : Can you move all my Delphil 2.9b long games threads into one ?

Gab
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by geots »

gleperlier wrote:
lucasart wrote:do you have to create a new thread everytime you play 2 games ?
No I don't have to.

By the way, as each game can last 6 hours , theses two games are played in 10 hours average. I guess that having a look at theses games are more valuable than 500 bullets or 100 blitz 3.... what do you think ?

But maybe you are just interested in 1000 bullet of Strelka to see if it's better than Houdini... waou....

Gab

Gab, don't listen to his silly shit. Tell him you will post what you want- when you want. He thinks God took a break and left him in charge.

gts
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by geots »

gleperlier wrote:@Julien : Can you move all my Delphil 2.9b long games threads into one ?

Gab

Bullshit. Post a thread each time you run a game at 40/120. He doesn't like it- that's tough shit. He doesn't run this goddam place.

If you don't- I'm going to post a thread every time I finish a 40/3 game. A couple of games a day and someone is worried about the number of your threads! He keeps worrying you- he hasn't seen threads like I will post.

gts
Last edited by geots on Sun May 20, 2012 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by lucasart »

geots wrote:
gleperlier wrote:
lucasart wrote:do you have to create a new thread everytime you play 2 games ?
No I don't have to.

By the way, as each game can last 6 hours , theses two games are played in 10 hours average. I guess that having a look at theses games are more valuable than 500 bullets or 100 blitz 3.... what do you think ?

But maybe you are just interested in 1000 bullet of Strelka to see if it's better than Houdini... waou....

Gab

Gab, don't listen to his silly shit. Tell him you will post what you want- when you want. He thinks God took a break and left him in charge.

gts
who put God in charge? you retard
lucasart
Posts: 3241
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:29 pm
Full name: lucasart

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by lucasart »

lucasart wrote:
geots wrote:
gleperlier wrote:
lucasart wrote:do you have to create a new thread everytime you play 2 games ?
No I don't have to.

By the way, as each game can last 6 hours , theses two games are played in 10 hours average. I guess that having a look at theses games are more valuable than 500 bullets or 100 blitz 3.... what do you think ?

But maybe you are just interested in 1000 bullet of Strelka to see if it's better than Houdini... waou....

Gab

Gab, don't listen to his silly shit. Tell him you will post what you want- when you want. He thinks God took a break and left him in charge.

gts
who put God in charge? you retard
In fact, and to get to the actual topic, it would be 100 = sqrt(10000) time more relevant to play 10000 games between Strelka and Houdini than a single one, even if this single game lasts 2 hours...
but maybe that's too complicated for you to understand george
User avatar
geots
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:42 am

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by geots »

gleperlier wrote:@Julien : Can you move all my Delphil 2.9b long games threads into one ?

Gab

You keep posting. I don't waste my time responding to anything he says. I can't- because I never read it. You just keep posting.

gts
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Delphil 2.9b - Hannibal 1.2 : 40/120 +60 : 0 - 2

Post by gleperlier »

geots wrote:
gleperlier wrote:
lucasart wrote:do you have to create a new thread everytime you play 2 games ?
No I don't have to.

By the way, as each game can last 6 hours , theses two games are played in 10 hours average. I guess that having a look at theses games are more valuable than 500 bullets or 100 blitz 3.... what do you think ?

But maybe you are just interested in 1000 bullet of Strelka to see if it's better than Houdini... waou....

Gab

Gab, don't listen to his silly shit. Tell him you will post what you want- when you want. He thinks God took a break and left him in charge.

gts
:D