SCCT Rating List - Houdini2Baracuda Pro x64 6c

[Sedat Canbaz]

Dear Friends,


Last Updated Chess Engine:
Houdini2Baracuda Pro x64 6c


SCCT Rating List (BayesElo):
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-rating/

Another calculation by EloStat 1.3:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/games/scct_elostat.txt

Conditions:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/2838-2/

Games:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/games/scct_3m2s.rar


Best Wishes,
Sedat Canbaz

[Sedat Canbaz]

Houdini2Baracuda x64 6c's performance after 1000 games:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/scct-rating/

SCCT's standings by EloStat 1.3:
http://www.sedatcanbaz.com/chess/games/scct_elostat.txt


Next Participants:
-Strelka 5.5 x64 1c
-Houdini 1.5a x64 6c



Kind Regards,
Sedat

[Tennison]

I prefer the elostat rating because T3 is ahead !

Seriously, as I can see, there is no real difference betweeen T3 and Z settings in results (73,6% with opponent rating 3198 and 73,9% with opponent rating 3195).

I'm not sure Z has improving T3 settings ...

Code: Select all

Last Update: 20:56 11.07.2012
-----------------------------

    Program                          Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws

  1 Houdini 2.0t3 Pro x64 6c       : 3376   17  16  1150    73.6 %   3198   36.9 %
  2 Houdini 2.0z Pro x64 6c        : 3375   16  16  1350    73.9 %   3195   34.3 %
  3 Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 6c        : 3360   15  15  1350    72.1 %   3195   38.1 %
  4 Houdini2Baracuda Pro x64 6c    : 3344   16  16  1000    69.0 %   3204   45.9 %
  5 Critter 1.6 x64 6c             : 3310   13  13  1350    65.7 %   3197   50.6 %
  6 Critter 1.4 x64 6c             : 3306   15  15  1150    67.0 %   3183   47.0 %
  7 Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c        : 3297   13  13  1350    63.9 %   3197   50.1 %
  8 Stockfish 120430P x64 6c       : 3295   14  14  1250    64.1 %   3194   48.7 %
  9 Ivanhoe B46fC x64 6c           : 3288   14  14  1200    63.5 %   3192   47.4 %
 10 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA x64 6c      : 3288   15  15  1100    62.9 %   3196   45.6 %
 11 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 6c          : 3288   14  13  1350    62.7 %   3198   47.0 %
 12 Vitruvius 1.11C x64 6c         : 3277   13  13  1350    61.2 %   3198   49.0 %
 13 Fire 2.2 xTreme x64 6c         : 3273   13  13  1350    60.6 %   3198   48.5 %
 14 Naum 4.2 x64 6c                : 3184   14  14  1350    47.5 %   3202   42.5 %
 15 Komodo 4.0 x64 1c              : 3172   14  14  1350    45.6 %   3202   41.3 %
 16 Equinox 1.35 x64 6c            : 3137   15  15  1250    40.7 %   3202   38.7 %
 17 Deep Fritz 13 w32 6c           : 3135   14  14  1350    40.3 %   3203   44.6 %
 18 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 6c        : 3125   14  14  1350    38.9 %   3204   41.3 %
 19 Chiron 1.1a x64 6c             : 3114   14  15  1350    37.4 %   3204   40.2 %
 20 Deep Junior 13.3 x64 6c        : 3103   17  17  1050    35.0 %   3210   39.1 %
 21 Deep Fritz 12 w32 6c           : 3100   15  15  1150    37.0 %   3192   42.1 %
 22 Deep Junior 13 x64 6c          : 3092   15  15  1300    35.0 %   3200   36.4 %
 23 Protector 1.4.0 x64 6c         : 3090   15  15  1350    34.0 %   3205   36.4 %
 24 Deep Shredder 12 x64 6c        : 3088   15  15  1350    33.7 %   3205   38.0 %
 25 Hiarcs 13.2 w32 6c             : 3084   15  15  1350    33.2 %   3205   34.9 %
 26 Spark 1.0 x64 6c               : 3083   14  15  1350    33.1 %   3205   40.5 %
 27 Zappa Mexico II x64 6c         : 3063   15  15  1350    30.4 %   3206   35.4 %
 28 Fruit 090705 x64 6c            : 2988   18  18  1150    23.1 %   3197   29.0 %


Games        :  17850 (finished)

White Wins   :   5879 (32.9 %)
Black Wins   :   4516 (25.3 %)
Draws        :   7455 (41.8 %)
Unfinished   :      0

White Perf.  : 53.8 %
Black Perf.  : 46.2 %

ECO A =    662 Games ( 3.7 %)
ECO B =   8195 Games (45.9 %)
ECO C =   3608 Games (20.2 %)
ECO D =   4388 Games (24.6 %)
ECO E =    997 Games ( 5.6 %)

[Tennison]

In Z settings, I think Queen= 960 instead 962 don't change a lot and Pawn=90 instead 93 don't change a lot too ...

If somebody want to improve 2.0 rating, I think you have to use basically T3 settings and then changing some other default values ...

[Sedat Canbaz]

I prefer the elostat rating because T3 is ahead !

Seriously, as I can see, there is no real difference betweeen T3 and Z settings in results (73,6% with opponent rating 3198 and 73,9% with opponent rating 3195).

I'm not sure Z has improving T3 settings ...

Code: Select all

Last Update: 20:56 11.07.2012
-----------------------------

    Program                          Elo    +   -   Games   Score   Av.Op.  Draws

  1 Houdini 2.0t3 Pro x64 6c       : 3376   17  16  1150    73.6 %   3198   36.9 %
  2 Houdini 2.0z Pro x64 6c        : 3375   16  16  1350    73.9 %   3195   34.3 %
  3 Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 6c        : 3360   15  15  1350    72.1 %   3195   38.1 %
  4 Houdini2Baracuda Pro x64 6c    : 3344   16  16  1000    69.0 %   3204   45.9 %
  5 Critter 1.6 x64 6c             : 3310   13  13  1350    65.7 %   3197   50.6 %
  6 Critter 1.4 x64 6c             : 3306   15  15  1150    67.0 %   3183   47.0 %
  7 Ivanhoe B46fE.02 x64 6c        : 3297   13  13  1350    63.9 %   3197   50.1 %
  8 Stockfish 120430P x64 6c       : 3295   14  14  1250    64.1 %   3194   48.7 %
  9 Ivanhoe B46fC x64 6c           : 3288   14  14  1200    63.5 %   3192   47.4 %
 10 Stockfish 2.2.2 JA x64 6c      : 3288   15  15  1100    62.9 %   3196   45.6 %
 11 Deep Rybka 4.1 x64 6c          : 3288   14  13  1350    62.7 %   3198   47.0 %
 12 Vitruvius 1.11C x64 6c         : 3277   13  13  1350    61.2 %   3198   49.0 %
 13 Fire 2.2 xTreme x64 6c         : 3273   13  13  1350    60.6 %   3198   48.5 %
 14 Naum 4.2 x64 6c                : 3184   14  14  1350    47.5 %   3202   42.5 %
 15 Komodo 4.0 x64 1c              : 3172   14  14  1350    45.6 %   3202   41.3 %
 16 Equinox 1.35 x64 6c            : 3137   15  15  1250    40.7 %   3202   38.7 %
 17 Deep Fritz 13 w32 6c           : 3135   14  14  1350    40.3 %   3203   44.6 %
 18 Spike 1.4 Leiden w32 6c        : 3125   14  14  1350    38.9 %   3204   41.3 %
 19 Chiron 1.1a x64 6c             : 3114   14  15  1350    37.4 %   3204   40.2 %
 20 Deep Junior 13.3 x64 6c        : 3103   17  17  1050    35.0 %   3210   39.1 %
 21 Deep Fritz 12 w32 6c           : 3100   15  15  1150    37.0 %   3192   42.1 %
 22 Deep Junior 13 x64 6c          : 3092   15  15  1300    35.0 %   3200   36.4 %
 23 Protector 1.4.0 x64 6c         : 3090   15  15  1350    34.0 %   3205   36.4 %
 24 Deep Shredder 12 x64 6c        : 3088   15  15  1350    33.7 %   3205   38.0 %
 25 Hiarcs 13.2 w32 6c             : 3084   15  15  1350    33.2 %   3205   34.9 %
 26 Spark 1.0 x64 6c               : 3083   14  15  1350    33.1 %   3205   40.5 %
 27 Zappa Mexico II x64 6c         : 3063   15  15  1350    30.4 %   3206   35.4 %
 28 Fruit 090705 x64 6c            : 2988   18  18  1150    23.1 %   3197   29.0 %


Games        :  17850 (finished)

White Wins   :   5879 (32.9 %)
Black Wins   :   4516 (25.3 %)
Draws        :   7455 (41.8 %)
Unfinished   :      0

White Perf.  : 53.8 %
Black Perf.  : 46.2 %

ECO A =    662 Games ( 3.7 %)
ECO B =   8195 Games (45.9 %)
ECO C =   3608 Games (20.2 %)
ECO D =   4388 Games (24.6 %)
ECO E =    997 Games ( 5.6 %)

Dear Ben,

In my opinion, the both Top Houdini settings (z and t3) have almost same strength

Keep up the good work,
Sedat

[marijan]

Notice that H2Baracuda version that Sedat runs is "old". Made a minor value change of N and Q. That new version ( according to my tests : 32 bit system 2 CPU 3min games) is better then old one...

Anyway, congrats to Ben and Salvador for good tuning, Sedat for great tests and Robert Houdart for strongest engine in the world.

Regards