Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Discussion of computer chess matches and engine tournaments.

Moderator: Ras

User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

Hello,

Will post and analyse here my future games on Playchess with Komodo 5 - 64 bits.

Conditions :

Playchess account : Numerobis
Time Control : 60 minutes + 15 secondes per moves.
CPU : Intel i7 2670QM
Hash size : 2 Go
Book : komodo.bin
GUI : Fritz 13

Cheers,

Gab
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

First game live :

Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores): 24.0 plies; 13 716kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz 4072MHz
versus
Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.6 plies; 1 098kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2194MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads) 17:48

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
User avatar
Graham Banks
Posts: 44620
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:52 am
Location: Auckland, NZ

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by Graham Banks »

gleperlier wrote:Hello,

Will post and analyse here my future games on Playchess with Komodo 5 - 64 bits.

Conditions :

Playchess account : Numerobis
Time Control : 60 minutes + 15 secondes per moves.
CPU : Intel i7 2670QM
Hash size : 2 Go
Book : komodo.bin
GUI : Fritz 13

Cheers,

Gab
Nice initiative. Should be interesting. :)
gbanksnz at gmail.com
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

gleperlier wrote:First game live :

Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores): 24.0 plies; 13 716kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz 4072MHz
versus
Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.6 plies; 1 098kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2194MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads) 17:48

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Komodo 5 x64 (single) - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores) = 1/2 - 1/2

PGN and Game analysis to follow.

Cheers,

Gab
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

Second game live :

Houdini 2.0b Pro x64 (6 cores): 24.4 plies; 14 183kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz 3301MHz
versus
Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.0 plies; 1 119kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2195MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads)

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

gleperlier wrote:Second game live :

Houdini 2.0b Pro x64 (6 cores): 24.4 plies; 14 183kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz 3301MHz
versus
Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.0 plies; 1 119kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2195MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads)

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores) - Komodo 5 x64 (single) - = 1 - 0

PGN and Game analysis to follow.

Cheers,

Gab
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

gleperlier wrote:
gleperlier wrote:First game live :

Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores): 24.0 plies; 13 716kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz 4072MHz
versus
Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.6 plies; 1 098kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2194MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads) 17:48

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Komodo 5 x64 (single) - Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores) = 1/2 - 1/2

PGN and Game analysis to follow.

Cheers,

Gab
So we will try to look at some long games of Komodo 5 single 64 bits on Playchess.
On this server, like I guess many others, people are running mostly Houdini 2.0c on 6 cores computers. So we have to always keep in mind that theses games are played mostly for fun and to analyse Komodo playing style.

On this first game, Komodo 5 is playing White and is out of book after 10...h6 in a B90 Sicilian Najdorf with 6.Be3

[d]rn2kb1r/1pq2pp1/p2pbn1p/4p3/4P1P1/1NN1BP2/PPP4P/R2QKB1R w KQkq - 0 10

This variation is not much played and there are only two games on Playchess Livebook for 11.Qd2 and that's the move played by Komodo with evaluation of 0.23

[d]rn2kb1r/1pq2pp1/p2pbn1p/4p3/4P1P1/1NN1BP2/PPPQ3P/R3KB1R b KQkq - 0 10

Strangely by transposition, we know have 29 games on Playchess livebook for this position :!:

Houdini is out of book after 12.a4*

[d]r3kb1r/2qn1pp1/p2pbn1p/1p2p3/P3P1PP/1NN1BP2/1PPQ4/R3KB1R b KQkq - 0 12

We can notice that Komodo 5 is trying to have some space, playing 11.h4 then 12.a4.

[d]r3k2r/1q1n1pb1/p2p2pp/P2Pp2P/1p3PP1/1N5B/1PPQ4/2KR3R b kq - 0 20
After 20.h5 we have Houdini still playing King in the middle and Komodo is still pushing his pawns up on king side.

After 20.Qg6+ White are now in a better position. Black King is almost forced to go to d8 and will remain in the middle. I don't like White bishop on h3 but h column can be activated quickly, same for f column. Komodo like this position and gives it a +1.17 but Critter 1.6 more like +0.89 and Houdini +0.91.

Few moves later, after 28...Nc5 we are in the following position :

[d]2rk3r/1q6/p2p3p/P1nPb1p1/1p4P1/1N3Q2/1PP5/1K1R1B1R w - - 0 29

Here the nice move 29.Rxh6! and I thought that this would have definitely open the position to a nice ending for Komodo.

[d]2rk3r/1q6/p2p3R/P1nPb1p1/1p4P1/1N3Q2/1PP5/1K1R1B2 b - - 0 29

But now look at how Houdini is doing something really great : In the same time Houdini weakened Komodo pawn structure and put his king in safety.

29....Rxh6 30.Qf8+ Kc7 31.Qxh6 Nxb3 32.cxb3 Kb8 33.Qxg5 Qc7!*

[d]1kr5/2q5/p2p4/P2Pb1Q1/1p4P1/1P6/1P6/1K1R1B2 w - - 0 34

Now Black is two pawns down but are threatening Qc2 and Qxa5 at the same time.
White has a g passed pawn but have weaknesses in his defense.

Opposite color bishop endings are also often drawn.

[d]1k6/2r5/3p2P1/p2Pb3/1p1q4/1P1B4/1P2Q3/1K3R2 b - - 0 47

After 47.g6 Komodo is pushing his passed pawn.

[d]1k6/2r3b1/3p2P1/p2P4/1p1q4/1P1B4/1P2Q3/1K3R2 w - - 0 48

Blocked by Houdini's bishop.

Then they decided to exchange queen and the endgame was drawn as expected.

[d]1R6/8/1k1K4/8/2B5/7r/8/8 b - - 0 88

Despite the CPU superiority, Houdini had always been under pressure. Komodo didn't succeed in pushing the advantage to a win.

PGN

[[Event "Rated game, 60 m + 15s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2012.07.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Numerobis, Komodo 5 64-bit"]
[Black "Unknown CPU, Houdini 2.0c Pro x6"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B90"]
[BlackElo "2634"]
[Annotator "0.23;0.31"]
[PlyCount "175"]
[EventDate "2012.07.20"]
[TimeControl "3600+15"]

{Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (6 cores): 28.3 plies; 17 247kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7
CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz 4072MHz, 2048 MB} 1. e4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]}
c5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 2. Nf3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} d6 {[%eval
0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 3. d4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} cxd4 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} 4. Nxd4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Nf6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:
00:00]} 5. Nc3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} a6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 6.
Be3 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} e5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 7. Nb3 {
[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Be6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 8. f3 {[%eval 1,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Qc7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 9. g4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:
00]} h6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 10. Qd2 {[%eval 23,22] [%emt 0:02:38]}
Nbd7 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 11. h4 {[%eval 1,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} b5 {
[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 12. a4 {[%eval 41,22] [%emt 0:00:41]} b4 {[%eval
31,24] [%emt 0:01:58]} 13. Nd5 {[%eval 58,23] [%emt 0:00:16]} Bxd5 {[%eval 29,
26] [%emt 0:02:44]} 14. exd5 {[%eval 60,23] [%emt 0:01:15]} g6 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Bf8-e7)} 15. O-O-O {[%eval 68,23] [%emt 0:02:03]} Nb6 {[%eval
0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} 16. Bxb6 {[%eval 70,22] [%emt 0:00:58]} Qxb6 {[%eval 47,
24] [%emt 0:00:45]} 17. a5 {[%eval 70,24] [%emt 0:01:22]} Qb7 {[%eval 48,24]
[%emt 0:01:05]} 18. Bh3 {[%eval 75,23] [%emt 0:00:06] (f3-f4)} Bg7 {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00] (Nf6-d7)} 19. f4 {[%eval 73,22] [%emt 0:01:20]} Nd7 {[%eval 54,
23] [%emt 0:02:25]} 20. h5 {[%eval 80,22] [%emt 0:01:18]} exf4 {[%eval 68,23]
[%emt 0:00:12]} 21. hxg6 {[%eval 83,22] [%emt 0:00:39]} fxg6 {[%eval 55,24]
[%emt 0:01:03]} 22. Qxf4 {[%eval 85,22] [%emt 0:00:21]} Be5 {[%eval 63,25]
[%emt 0:01:10]} 23. Qe4 {[%eval 109,23] [%emt 0:07:34]} g5 {[%eval 86,27]
[%emt 0:01:35]} 24. Qg6+ {[%eval 117,23] [%emt 0:00:43]} Kd8 {[%eval 91,26]
[%emt 0:00:45]} 25. Bf1 {[%eval 118,23] [%emt 0:01:49]} Nf8 {[%eval 89,25]
[%emt 0:00:27] (Ra8-c8)} 26. Qe4 {[%eval 108,22] [%emt 0:01:21] (Dg6-d3)} Nd7 {
[%eval 56,26] [%emt 0:01:29]} 27. Kb1 {[%eval 93,22] [%emt 0:02:42]} Rc8 {
[%eval 60,26] [%emt 0:04:03]} 28. Qf3 {[%eval 115,24] [%emt 0:01:18] (De4-g6)}
Nc5 {[%eval 80,24] [%emt 0:03:01]} 29. Rxh6 {[%eval 111,25] [%emt 0:00:25]}
Rxh6 {[%eval 75,26] [%emt 0:00:49]} 30. Qf8+ {[%eval 100,23] [%emt 0:00:12]}
Kc7 {[%eval 75,29] [%emt 0:01:39]} 31. Qxh6 {[%eval 101,25] [%emt 0:00:59]}
Nxb3 {[%eval 70,29] [%emt 0:00:58]} 32. cxb3 {[%eval 104,24] [%emt 0:00:09]}
Kb8 {[%eval 67,29] [%emt 0:00:59]} 33. Qxg5 {[%eval 106,25] [%emt 0:00:42]} Qc7
{[%eval 67,28] [%emt 0:00:29] (Qb7-h7+)} 34. Qd2 {[%eval 106,23] [%emt 0:00:31]
} Qxa5 {[%eval 66,27] [%emt 0:00:40]} 35. g5 {[%eval 107,26] [%emt 0:01:17]
(Dd2-f2)} Qb6 {[%eval 67,28] [%emt 0:01:16]} 36. Qd3 {[%eval 107,24] [%emt 0:
00:06] (Lf1-e2)} Rg8 {[%eval 67,25] [%emt 0:01:03] (Rc8-f8)} 37. Qf3 {[%eval
114,21] [%emt 0:01:30]} Rg7 {[%eval 67,26] [%emt 0:00:15] (Qb6-a7)} 38. Be2 {
[%eval 115,23] [%emt 0:01:58] (g5-g6)} Qd8 {[%eval 65,27] [%emt 0:01:03]
(Rg7-c7)} 39. Rc1 {[%eval 119,20] [%emt 0:00:55]} Rc7 {[%eval 66,27] [%emt 0:
00:13]} 40. Rg1 {[%eval 125,22] [%emt 0:02:01]} Qh8 {[%eval 66,27] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 41. Qe4 {[%eval 116,23] [%emt 0:01:22]} a5 {[%eval 66,28] [%emt 0:00:00]}
42. Rh1 {[%eval 127,21] [%emt 0:00:15]} Qg7 {[%eval 71,28] [%emt 0:04:36]} 43.
Qe3 {[%eval 108,25] [%emt 0:02:23]} Rc5 {[%eval 75,28] [%emt 0:00:00]} 44. Bd3
{[%eval 108,25] [%emt 0:01:33]} Qa7 {[%eval 75,28] [%emt 0:00:57] (Qg7-f7)} 45.
Rf1 {[%eval 118,23] [%emt 0:01:10] (g5-g6)} Rc7 {[%eval 77,27] [%emt 0:00:54]}
46. Qe2 {[%eval 108,23] [%emt 0:00:30] (Tf1-f8+)} Qd4 {[%eval 77,27] [%emt 0:
00:55]} 47. g6 {[%eval 116,22] [%emt 0:00:06] (Tf1-f8+)} Bg7 {[%eval 74,27]
[%emt 0:00:52] (Kb8-a7)} 48. Rf7 {[%eval 115,22] [%emt 0:01:12] (Ld3-f5)} Qe5 {
[%eval 70,28] [%emt 0:00:52]} 49. Rf2 {[%eval 115,24] [%emt 0:00:27]} Re7 {
[%eval 70,28] [%emt 0:00:41] (Kb8-a7)} 50. Qc2 {[%eval 113,23] [%emt 0:00:34]
(De2xe5)} Rc7 {[%eval 70,27] [%emt 0:00:58]} 51. Bc4 {[%eval 114,23] [%emt 0:
00:26]} Qd4 {[%eval 71,27] [%emt 0:00:29]} 52. Rd2 {[%eval 115,23] [%emt 0:00:
03]} Qc5 {[%eval 71,27] [%emt 0:01:38]} 53. Qe4 {[%eval 115,24] [%emt 0:00:31]}
Be5 {[%eval 71,27] [%emt 0:00:21]} 54. Re2 {[%eval 115,24] [%emt 0:03:13]} a4 {
[%eval 80,26] [%emt 0:00:04] (Qc5-g1+)} 55. Qe3 {[%eval 99,22] [%emt 0:00:27]}
Qxe3 {[%eval 83,28] [%emt 0:00:29] (Qc5-a5)} 56. Rxe3 {[%eval 120,21] [%emt 0:
00:06]} axb3 {[%eval 62,30] [%emt 0:00:55]} 57. Bxb3 {[%eval 116,25] [%emt 0:
00:26] (Te3-e4)} Ka7 {[%eval 61,31] [%emt 0:01:12] (Rc7-g7)} 58. Re4 {[%eval
100,25] [%emt 0:00:42]} Rg7 {[%eval 61,33] [%emt 0:00:25]} 59. Rg4 {[%eval 101,
26] [%emt 0:00:01]} Ka6 {[%eval 61,33] [%emt 0:01:18]} 60. Bc2 {[%eval 93,25]
[%emt 0:00:13] (Lb3-c4+)} Kb5 {[%eval 57,30] [%emt 0:00:45]} 61. Ka2 {[%eval
86,24] [%emt 0:00:21] (Lc2-d3+)} Kc5 {[%eval 38,29] [%emt 0:01:04]} 62. Bb3 {
[%eval 74,23] [%emt 0:00:29]} Bd4 {[%eval 37,29] [%emt 0:00:25]} 63. Rg2 {
[%eval 66,24] [%emt 0:00:43]} Bf6 {[%eval 37,30] [%emt 0:00:00]} 64. Rc2+ {
[%eval 73,24] [%emt 0:00:58]} Kd4 {[%eval 36,32] [%emt 0:00:00]} 65. Rc4+ {
[%eval 69,25] [%emt 0:01:33]} Kd3 {[%eval 36,32] [%emt 0:00:00] (Kd4-e5)} 66.
Rg4 {[%eval 71,25] [%emt 0:01:25]} Ra7+ {[%eval 36,31] [%emt 0:00:24]} 67. Kb1
{[%eval 71,25] [%emt 0:00:06]} Bd4 {[%eval 36,32] [%emt 0:01:14]} 68. Rg3+ {
[%eval 76,26] [%emt 0:01:40] (Tg4-h4)} Ke4 {[%eval 36,31] [%emt 0:01:55]} 69.
Bc2+ {[%eval 77,26] [%emt 0:00:30]} Kxd5 {[%eval 36,31] [%emt 0:01:07]} 70.
Bb3+ {[%eval 77,26] [%emt 0:00:32]} Kc6 {[%eval 36,31] [%emt 0:00:20] (Kd5-e4)}
71. Bf7 {[%eval 89,22] [%emt 0:00:08] (Tg3-g4)} Bg7 {[%eval 27,29] [%emt 0:00:
45]} 72. Rh3 {[%eval 80,26] [%emt 0:00:28]} Re7 {[%eval 27,30] [%emt 0:00:22]
(Bg7-f6)} 73. Rh7 {[%eval 93,23] [%emt 0:00:08]} Bf6 {[%eval 27,30] [%emt 0:00:
30] (b4-b3)} 74. g7 {[%eval 90,26] [%emt 0:01:05]} b3 {[%eval 27,33] [%emt 0:
00:00]} 75. Kc1 {[%eval 90,26] [%emt 0:00:15]} Bxg7 {[%eval 27,32] [%emt 0:00:
00]} 76. Rxg7 {[%eval 90,25] [%emt 0:00:05]} Kb6 {[%eval 26,33] [%emt 0:00:00]}
77. Kd2 {[%eval 90,21] [%emt 0:00:08]} Rc7 {[%eval 26,33] [%emt 0:00:00]} 78.
Kd3 {[%eval 85,23] [%emt 0:00:17]} Rc2 {[%eval 26,32] [%emt 0:00:43]} 79. Bxb3
{[%eval 84,24] [%emt 0:00:35]} Rxb2 {[%eval 25,32] [%emt 0:00:00]} 80. Kc3 {
[%eval 83,24] [%emt 0:00:20] (Kd3-c4)} Rh2 {[%eval 21,33] [%emt 0:01:05]
(Rb2-f2)} 81. Kd4 {[%eval 81,25] [%emt 0:01:39] (Lb3-e6)} d5 {[%eval 21,31]
[%emt 0:01:26]} 82. Rg8 {[%eval 80,26] [%emt 0:00:59] (Tg7-g4)} Rh4+ {[%eval
21,33] [%emt 0:00:50] (Kb6-b5)} 83. Kxd5 {[%eval 82,29] [%emt 0:00:56] (Kd4-e5)
} Rh7 {[%emt 0:00:00] (Rh4-h6)} 84. Kd6 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Rh3 {
[%emt 0:00:00]} 85. Rd8 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Ka7 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 86.
Bd5 {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00]} Ka6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 87. Bc4+ {[%eval 0,0]
[%emt 0:00:00]} Kb6 {[%emt 0:00:00]} 88. Rb8+ {[%eval 0,0] [%emt 0:00:00] (Lag:
Av=0.19s, max=1.8s)} 1/2-1/2[/u]
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

gleperlier wrote:Second game live :

Houdini 2.0b Pro x64 (6 cores): 24.4 plies; 14 183kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3960X CPU @ 3.30GHz 3301MHz
versus
Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.0 plies; 1 119kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2195MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads)

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Hello,

I guess just one or two position to mention for Larry and Don.

After 46.b5

[d]8/r3bpk1/2Rp2p1/1P2p1Pp/4B2P/1KP2P2/r7/3R4 b - - 0 46

Komodo played 46...Ra3+?!. Seems that 46...Ra5!? is better.

After 49.c4

[d]8/4bpk1/2Rp2p1/1P1Kp1Pp/r1P1B2P/5P2/1r6/3R4 b - - 0 49

Komodo played 49...Bf8??

You can find bellow the annotated game.

[Event "Rated game, 60 m + 15s"]
[Site "Engine Room"]
[Date "2012.07.20"]
[Round "?"]
[White "JML26"]
[Black "Numerobis, Komodo 5 64-bit"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B90"]
[WhiteElo "2614"]
[BlackElo "2541"]
[Annotator "Houdini 1.5a x64 (120m)"]
[PlyCount "119"]
[EventDate "2012.07.20"]

{B90: Sicilian Najdorf: Unusual White 6th moves, 6 Be3 Ng4 and 6 Be3 e5} 1. e4
c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. f3 e5 7. Nb3 Be6 8. Be3 h5 9.
Qd2 Nbd7 10. O-O-O Be7 11. Kb1 b5 12. Nd5 Bxd5 13. exd5 Nb6 14. Bxb6 Qxb6 15.
Na5 Rc8 16. Bd3 $146 (16. Nc6 Nxd5 17. Nxe7 Nxe7 18. Qxd6 Qxd6 19. Rxd6 Nc6 20.
Rd2 Ke7 21. Bd3 Rhd8 22. Rhd1 g6 23. a4 (23. c3 Na5 24. Kc2 f5 25. a4 Nc4 26.
Re2 Kf6 27. axb5 axb5 28. Ra1 Nd6 29. Kb3 Rc6 30. Ra5 Nb7 31. Rxb5 Nc5+ 32.
Rxc5 Rxc5 33. Kc2 Rcd5 34. Bc4 Rd1 35. b4 h4 36. b5 Rg1 37. b6 Rb8 {Jens,J
(2376)-Le Quang,L (2687) Mulhouse 2011 0-1 (37)}) 23... Rb8 24. axb5 axb5 25.
Be4 Rxd2 26. Rxd2 Nd4 27. b4 f5 28. Bd3 h4 29. c3 Ne6 30. Bf1 Nf4 {Dominguez
Perez,L (2717)-Anand,V (2791) Linares 2009 1/2-1/2 (42)}) (16. c4 bxc4 17. Nxc4
Qc5 18. Ne3 Qa7 19. Bc4 O-O 20. b3 Nd7 21. Qe2 Nc5 22. Nf5 Rfd8 23. Nxe7+ Qxe7
24. f4 e4 25. Qxh5 a5 26. a4 Rb8 27. Ka2 Qf6 28. Qg5 Qc3 29. Rc1 Qd2+ 30. Ka3
Qb4+ {Kalofonos,P (1713)-Kelires,A (1825) Eretria 2011 0-1 (45)}) 16... Nxd5
17. Bf5 Rb8 18. Qxd5 Qxa5 19. g3 {Controls h4} O-O 20. Rhg1 Qb4 21. Be4 Qc5 22.
Qd3 g6 {Secures f5} 23. h4 Qc4 24. Qe3 Kg7 25. g4 Rh8 26. Qa7 {White threatens
to win material: Qa7xe7} Rbe8 (26... Bxh4 $2 {doesn't solve anything} 27. Bd5
Qf4 28. gxh5 $18) 27. g5 {White gains space} Qc5 {Black threatens to win
material: Qc5xa7} 28. Qxa6 {Attacks the backward pawn on d6} Rb8 29. Rh1 Rhc8
30. Rd5 Qc4 31. a3 ({Less advisable is} 31. Rxd6 Bxd6 32. Qxd6 Qc7 33. Qxc7
Rxc7 $15) 31... Rc7 32. Rhd1 Bf8 33. c3 Qe2 34. a4 Be7 35. R5d2 {White
threatens to win material: Rd2xe2} Qc4 36. axb5 Qxb5 (36... Rxb5 $2 37. Bd3
Rxb2+ 38. Rxb2 (38. Kxb2 $6 Qxc3+ 39. Kb1 Qb3+ 40. Ka1 Rc5 $14) 38... Qxh4 39.
Rb8 Qxg5 40. Qb5 $18) 37. Qxb5 Rxb5 {White has a new passed pawn: b2} 38. Kc2
Ra5 39. Rd5 Ra2 40. Rb5 Raa7 41. Rb6 Rc4 42. b3 {White threatens to win
material: b3xc4} Rcc7 43. b4 Ra3 {Black threatens to win material: Ra3xc3} 44.
Rc6 Ra2+ 45. Kb3 {White threatens to win material: Kb3xa2} Rca7 46. b5 {White
has a new backward pawn: c3} R7a3+ (46... R7a5 $142 $5 $16) 47. Kc4 $18 Ra4+
48. Kd5 Rb2 49. c4 Bf8 $4 {Black has lost his nerve... understandable when you
consider his position} (49... Rbb4 $142 $18) 50. Rc7 Rab4 51. Rc1 Rh2 52. Kc6
Rxh4 53. b6 Rf4 54. b7 h4 55. Bd5 Kg8 (55... e4 {hoping against hope} 56. fxe4
Kg8 $18) 56. Ra1 Kh7 57. Ra8 Bg7 58. Rxf7 Rf5 59. Rxf5 gxf5 60. b8=Q (60. b8=Q
Rxb8 61. Rxb8 $18) 1-0

Cheers,

Gab
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

Third game live :

Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.3 plies; 1 309kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2194MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads)

versus

Critter 1.6 64-bit GTB (6 cores): 23.4 plies; 9 675kN/s AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor 3610MHz

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
User avatar
gleperlier
Posts: 1033
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:03 pm

Re: Numerobis featuring Komodo 5 live on Playchess

Post by gleperlier »

Game four live :

Komodo 5 64-bit (single): 22.0 plies; 1 151kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2670QM CPU @ 2.20GHz 2194MHz, (4 cores, 8 threads)
versus
Houdini 2.0c Pro x64 (8 cores): 24.8 plies; 11 221kN/s Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz 3199MHz

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us