GROUP 14: Final Rounds- Final Standings!

[geots]

The last rounds and final standings are posted below for Group 14. I'll go ahead now and post the link for the complete set of games in PGN format:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/76847541/Group%2014%20PGNs.rar

When all groups have finished, the top 2 finishers here will face-off for the Group 14 championship.



Intel i5 w/4TCs
Fritz 11 gui/Fritz 13 gui
1CPU/32-bit or 64-bit where available
128MB hash
Bases=NONE [No egtb & no egbb]
Ponder_Learning=OFF
Perfect 2012b.ctg w/12-move limit
40/21 Repeating (Benched to adapt to CCRL 40/40)
RR with 2 cycles





Group 14- Final Results
-----------


Round 16
-----------
Surprise 4.3b13 v Rival 1.18 (0-1)
Marvin 1.3.0 v Smash 1.0.3 (draw)
Heracles 0.6.16 v MatMoi 7.15.0 (1-0)
Dabbaba 6.52 JA v Clueless 1.4 (0-1)
Predateur 2.2.1 x64 v Warrior 1.0.3 (draw)
Cupcake 1.0 JA v Micro-Max 4.8 (1-0)

Round 17
-----------
Cupcake 1.0 JA v Surprise 4.3b13 (draw)
Micro-Max 4.8 v Predateur 2.2.1 x64 (0-1)
Warrior 1.0.3 v Dabbaba 6.52 JA (0-1)
Clueless 1.4 v Heracles 0.6.16 (1-0)
MatMoi 7.15.0 v Marvin 1.3.0 (0-1)
Smash 1.03 v Rival 1.18 (draw)

Round 18
-----------
Surprise 4.3b13 v Smash 1.0.3 (draw)
Rival 1.18 v MatMoi 7.15.0 (1-0)
Marvin 1.3.0 v Clueless 1.4 (0-1)
Heracles 0.6.16 v Warrior 1.0.3 (draw)
Dabbaba 6.52 JA v Micro-Max 4.8 (0-1)
Predateur 2.2.1 x64 v Cupcake 1.0 JA (1-0)

Round 19
-----------
Predateur 2.2.1 x64 v Surprise 4.3b13 (0-1)
Cupcake 1.0 JA v Dabbaba 6.52 JA (1-0)
Micro-Max 4.8 v Heracles 0.6.16 (0-1)
Warrior 1.0.3 v Marvin 1.3.0 (draw)
Clueless 1.4 v Rival 1.18 (draw)
MatMoi 7.15.0 v Smash 1.0.3 (draw)

Round 20
-----------
Surprise 4.3b13 v MatMoi 7.15.0 (0-1)
Smash 1.0.3 v Clueless 1.4 (1-0)
Rival 1.18 v Warrior 1.0.3 (1-0)
Marvin 1.3.0 v Micro-Max 4.8 (draw)
Heracles 0.6.16 v Cupcake 1.0 JA (1-0)
Dabbaba 6.52 JA v Predateur 2.2.1 x64 (draw)

Round 21
-----------
Dabbaba 6.52 JA v Surprise 4.3b13 (1-0)
Predateur 2.2.1 x64 v Heracles 0.6.16 (0-1)
Cupcake 1.0 JA v Marvin 1.3.0 (0-1)
Micro-Max 4.8 v Rival 1.18 (0-1)
Warrior 1.0.3 v Smash 1.0.3 (1-0)
Clueless 1.4 v MatMoi 7.15.0 (1-0)

Round 22
-----------
Surprise 4.3b13 v Clueless 1.4 (0-1)
MatMoi 7.15.0 v Warrior 1.0.3 (0-1)
Smash 1.0.3 v Micro-Max 4.8 (1-0)
Rival 1.18 v Cupcake 1.0 JA (draw)
Marvin 1.3.0 Predateur 2.2.1 x64 (1-0)
Heracles 0.6.16 v Dabbaba 6.52 JA (0-1)

Code: Select all

Final Standings
----------------

1.Marvin 1.3.0         15.5
2.Smash 1.0.3          15.0
3.Rival 1.18           14.5
4.Clueless 1.4         12.0
5.Dabbaba 6.52 JA      12.0
6.Heracles 0.6.16      11.5
7.Warrior 1.0.3        10.5
8.Surprise 4.3b13      10.0
9.Cupcake 1.0 JA        9.5 
10.Predateur 2.2.1 x64  9.5
11.Micro-Max 4.8        8.0
12.MatMoi 7.15.0        4.0

Marvin 1.3.0 v Smash 1.0.3- 25 game match for the group championship.

More to follow- much more!


george

[Dan Honeycutt]

Phhht, Cupcake. Three losses, two wins and two draws is not what you call a sprint for the finish line.

Tied for 9-10 with Predateur. We have work to do. Watch out, Julien, we're coming to get you.

Best
Dan H.

[geots]

Phhht, Cupcake. Three losses, two wins and two draws is not what you call a sprint for the finish line.

Tied for 9-10 with Predateur. We have work to do. Watch out, Julien, we're coming to get you.

Best
Dan H.

I was quite proud of your engine. You have done very well with it in a short time.


Best,

gts

[ZirconiumX]

Bayeselo with offset 1800:

Code: Select all

Rank Name                   Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 Marvin 1.3.0          1915  120  120    22   70%  1790   32% 
   2 smash 1.0.3           1912  122  122    22   68%  1790   27% 
   3 Rival 1.18            1900  122  122    22   66%  1791   23% 
   4 Dabbaba 6.52 JA       1830  127  127    22   55%  1797    9% 
   5 Clueless V1.4         1827  127  127    22   55%  1798    9% 
   6 Heracles 0.6.16       1816  113  113    22   52%  1799   41% 
   7 Warrior 1.0.3         1791  116  116    22   48%  1801   32% 
   8 Surprise 4.3b13       1775  118  118    22   45%  1802   27% 
   9 Predateur v2.2.1_x64  1765  119  119    22   43%  1803   23% 
  10 Cupcake 1.0 JA        1765  117  117    22   43%  1803   32% 
  11 Micro-Max 4.8         1717  125  125    22   36%  1808   18% 
  12 MatMoi 7.15.0         1586  142  142    22   18%  1819    9% 

Offset of 1800 chosen because Marvin's CCRL elo is 1901, so it is close enough.

Matthew:out

[Dan Honeycutt]

I was quite proud of your engine. You have done very well with it in a short time.


Best,

gts

Well, thanks, George. I suppose it's not bad considering that back in March I had never written a single line of code in Java. Of course I took frequent looks at Bruja but I copied very little. When you have a fresh slate you fix the little things that have been nagging you. So I changed the board numbering from a1, b1, ... h8 to a1, a2, ... h8 so I could speed up move generation by a tad. Then I changed the piece values to a scheme that let me test for sliders with a single bit. Then I changed black from 8 to 1 so I could rearrange arrays for no reason other than I liked it better. And so on and so on.

Thanks for including Cupcake in your tournament.

Best
Dan H.

[mloftus955]

Dan, I bet that Cupcake will beat me. I will try a game against it this week schedule permitting. Engines at this level still give interesting games, and if I survive intact to the endgame you never know. My best chance is to get the engines when they are new.

I also think Dabbaba and Clueless did pretty good here, interesting tournament.


Mark

[Dan Honeycutt]

Dan, I bet that Cupcake will beat me. I will try a game against it this week schedule permitting. Engines at this level still give interesting games, and if I survive intact to the endgame you never know. My best chance is to get the engines when they are new.

I also think Dabbaba and Clueless did pretty good here, interesting tournament.


Mark

Hi Mark,

It beats me but that's not saying much. But, yes, I welcome your comments. If you have a chance fiddle around with the personality feature. I included that specifically for human play (and on the off-chance someone might help me tune the evaluation which presently has values pulled out of my, err, the air.)

Best
Dan H.